Hacker Drained $200,000 from XRP Cross-Chain Bridge

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-12

Introduzione

A hacker stole approximately $200,000 from the XRPL bridge connecting the XRP Ledger to the tx blockchain on August 9th. The attacker exploited a flaw in the bridge's deposit logic, allowing fake transactions to trigger the minting of wrapped tokens on the tx network, which were then used to drain real XRP from the bridge's reserve wallet. The theft occurred over 97 minutes across 94 transactions, leaving only a small balance. The tx team halted the bridge, fixed the vulnerability, and is working with experts and the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center. They confirmed the mainnet and exchange funds were unaffected and are exploring compensation for impacted users. Simultaneously, the Harmony blockchain suffered a separate attack. An attacker reportedly created 4 billion ONE tokens (26% of the supply) via empty blocks, moving 2.8 billion to exchanges. This caused the token's price to drop nearly 30%. The Harmony team is collaborating with exchanges to freeze the funds and investigating patch and rollback options. This follows a previous $100 million hack in June 2022, which was attributed to North Korean hackers.

Simultaneously, the L1 blockchain Harmony was hacked.

The tx project team disclosed details of an attack on the cross-chain bridge connecting the $XRP Ledger to their blockchain. The malicious actor emptied the reserve wallet, stealing $200,000.

An update on the XRPL bridge incident.

On August 9, the tx XRPL bridge was exploited and $XRP was drained from the bridge's reserve wallet on the $XRP Ledger. The bridge has been halted, the vulnerability has been identified, and all potential remedies are being evaluated. This...

— tx (@txEcosystem) August 11, 2026

The incident occurred on August 9. The attacker exploited a flaw in the deposit handling logic: the bridge accepted transactions without actual $XRP as real deposits. Based on these false records, the system issued 'wrapped' tokens on the tx network, and the hacker used them to withdraw real coins from the treasury.

The attack did not affect funds in the mainnet, on centralized or decentralized exchanges, the developers emphasized.

According to the xrpl.to service, the fund withdrawal took 97 minutes. During this time, almost 200,000 $XRP ($199,916) left the bridge's address in 94 transactions to two new wallets. The balance remained at 493.5 $XRP instead of the initial approximately 200,410. Each payment was confirmed by 17 out of 28 relayer keys — exactly the number required by the rules.

Source: xrpl.to.

Analysts noted that the cybercriminal did not gain access to private keys, and the $XRP Ledger itself operated without failures.

After detecting suspicious activity, the tx team halted the bridge's operation, fixed the vulnerable code, engaged blockchain experts, and submitted all transaction data to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center. The developers are now considering compensation options for affected users.

Harmony Hack

Simultaneously, the L1 blockchain Harmony suffered a hacker attack. The project team stated that it is working with exchanges to freeze the stolen funds and is considering network rollback options.

We are working with our team and appropriate exchanges to stop and freeze the funds.

We are working on a patch and rollback options.

Will update when we have new information. https://t.co/XB0nCwTAyN

— Harmony 💙 (@harmonyprotocol) August 12, 2026

An analyst under the nickname Juiceberg reported that through empty blocks, the malicious actor created 4 billion ONE — 26% of the token's total supply. Of these, 2.8 billion were transferred to trading platforms.

Amid the incident, the coin's price plummeted by almost 30%.

Source: CoinGecko.

In June 2022, the project had already fallen victim to cybercriminals. At that time, Harmony lost assets worth $100 million. CertiK specialists indicated that the malicious actor "somehow" gained control over the platform's multisig wallet.

Elliptic analysts stated that the hack was carried out by hackers from North Korea. Later, the FBI came to a similar conclusion.

Recall that on August 10, unknown attackers targeted the Coinsbuy platform and stole $8 million. A few days earlier, cybercriminals emptied Lightning nodes via a vulnerability in BTCPay.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main vulnerability exploited in the XRP bridge attack?

AThe attacker exploited a flaw in the deposit processing logic: the bridge accepted transactions without actual $XRP as real deposits, which allowed the system to mint 'wrapped' tokens on the tx network based on these false records.

QHow much was stolen from the XRP Ledger bridge, and through how many transactions?

ANearly 200,000 $XRP ($199,916) was stolen from the bridge's reserve wallet over the course of 94 transactions.

QWhat two primary actions did the tx project take after identifying the suspicious activity on their bridge?

AThey halted the bridge's operation, patched the vulnerable code, engaged blockchain experts, and reported all transaction data to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center.

QWhat incident occurred on the Harmony blockchain in parallel with the XRP bridge attack?

AThe Harmony L1 blockchain was also hacked. An attacker reportedly minted 4 billion ONE tokens (26% of the total supply) through empty blocks and sent 2.8 billion of them to exchanges.

QWhat was the immediate impact on the price of Harmony's ONE token following the reported hack?

AFollowing the incident, the price of the ONE token plummeted by almost 30%.

Letture associate

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

Wall Street Questions the AI Narrative of Tech Giants Wall Street is shifting its focus from the hype surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) to a rigorous financial reality check. Following strong earnings reports from companies like Google and a massive $500 billion financing initiative from Nvidia for AI infrastructure, the market reaction has been mixed and skeptical. The core concern revolves around the massive capital expenditure (CapEx) required for AI development—building data centers and acquiring chips—and whether future cash flows can justify these upfront costs. Investors are now scrutinizing free cash flow (FCF), which measures the cash left after operational expenses and capital investments. A negative FCF, as seen recently with Alphabet (Google's parent company), signals heavy immediate spending, even if profits are growing. The divergent stock reactions highlight this new scrutiny. Microsoft's stock surged after its earnings, supported by strong operating cash flow, growing cloud revenue (Azure), and a large backlog of committed business. In contrast, Alphabet's stock fell despite profit growth because its capital spending caused FCF to turn negative for the first time. Similarly, Nvidia's announcement of a $500 billion financing platform, while potentially expanding its market, raised questions about whether AI build-out has become too expensive for tech companies to fund internally. Analysts are moving beyond simply asking if there is AI demand—which cloud revenue growth confirms—to deeper questions: the speed at which AI investments translate into revenue, profit, and ultimately, cash returns. The market is evaluating the "return on invested capital" (ROIC) over the long term, considering factors like rapid chip obsolescence, energy costs, and future competition. In summary, Wall Street's AI narrative is evolving from grand vision to a detailed financial and operational examination. The key question is no longer if AI is transformative, but whether companies can generate cash returns fast enough to outpace the immense costs of building it. Free cash flow has become a critical first filter in this reassessment.

marsbit33 min fa

Wall Street Begins to Question Tech Giants' AI Narrative

marsbit33 min fa

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

In the spring of 2026, Elon Musk unveiled the TeraFab chip manufacturing plan, aiming to meet the immense computing power needs of SpaceX and Tesla. He subsequently signaled a move into the photolithography machine market, with speculation centering on a Free Electron Laser (FEL) approach to challenge the dominance of traditional EUV technology. Currently, ASML, utilizing Laser-Produced Plasma (LPP) EUV光源, holds a near-monopoly. However, LPP faces bottlenecks in energy conversion efficiency, tin debris contamination, and a power ceiling. In contrast, FEL technology, pursued by companies like xLight (where former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger serves as executive chairman), offers a different path. It generates EUV light by accelerating electrons, potentially providing higher power without plasma conversion and its associated contamination, targeting the sub-13.5nm "beyond-EUV" wavelength range. The photolithography landscape shows three main trajectories: ASML's incremental evolution (like High-NA EUV),光源革新 like FEL targeting ASML's core component, and non-EUV alternatives like Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) or Electron Beam Lithography (EBL). While ASML remains the dominant player with strong financials and产能 expansion plans, new entrants are challenging the status quo. xLight claims its FEL could boost productivity by 50-100%. Other paths include Substrate's particle-accelerator-based X-ray lithography and Chinese research into LPP alternatives. Musk's TeraFab is a high-stakes bet that FEL can move from lab to fab, that "plug-and-play"光源 replacement can circumvent ASML's ecosystem, and that massive future compute demand justifies a new supply chain. His public endorsement of FEL signifies that the photolithography business is no longer ASML's game alone.

marsbit33 min fa

An Unexpected Player Enters the Lithography Machine Arena

marsbit33 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片