Grayscale Highlights Bitcoin’s Resilience as Community Prepares for Quantum Era

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-04-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-07

Introduzione

Grayscale's head of research, Zach Pandl, argues that Bitcoin's primary challenge in the quantum era is not technological but social. While a recent Google study raised concerns about quantum computers potentially breaking Bitcoin's encryption, Pandl highlights that Bitcoin's UTXO model, proof-of-work consensus, and lack of native smart contracts make it less vulnerable than other cryptocurrencies. The real issue lies in the community's ability to reach consensus on how to handle the estimated 1.7 million BTC in early, quantum-vulnerable addresses—including those possibly belonging to Satoshi Nakamoto. Potential solutions include burning those coins, limiting spending from risky addresses, or taking no action. This echoes past divisive debates, like the one surrounding Bitcoin Ordinals, underscoring the difficulty of achieving community agreement.

If the Bitcoin community is unable to resolve certain tense problems, the chief researcher at Grayscale warns that resolving the quantum danger to the cryptocurrency may be more of a social than a technological task. On March 30, Google published a document that grabbed the crypto industry’s attention. The research hinted that a quantum computer might perhaps decrypt Bitcoin’s encryption with a lot less power than expected.

However, Grayscale’s head of research Zach Pandl argued that Bitcoin’s technical solution isn’t the issue; he argued that “bitcoin has lower risk than other cryptocurrencies” due to its use of a UTXO model and proof-of-work consensus, lack of native smart contracts, and the fact that certain address types are not quantum vulnerable.

Community’s Ability to Decide on a Course of Action

Pandl said that the community’s ability to decide on a course of action would be the real obstacle. The fate of the approximately 1.7 million Bitcoins (BTC) held in early P2PK addresses, including Satoshi’s estimated 1 million BTC hoard, which is now valued at over $68 billion, has sparked heated debates among the Bitcoin community.

Coins for which the private key is unavailable or misplaced must be handled by the Bitcoin community, according to Pandl’s writing. Burning the coins, purposefully reducing the pace of spending from susceptible addresses, or doing nothing are their three primary alternatives.

In 2023, a major controversy involving Bitcoin Ordinals—a technology that allows for the imprinting of data like text and pictures onto a satoshi, the smallest unit of Bitcoin—erupts over the use of blockspace. Pandl was alluding to this. Even while things have calmed down a little in the intervening two years, the two camps are still very much divided.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

SEC Moves Crypto Safe Harbor Proposal to White House for Review

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main challenge in addressing the quantum threat to Bitcoin according to Grayscale's head of research?

AThe main challenge is the community's ability to decide on a course of action, which is more of a social task than a technological one.

QWhy does Zach Pandl argue that Bitcoin has lower quantum risk than other cryptocurrencies?

AHe argues this is due to Bitcoin's use of a UTXO model, proof-of-work consensus, lack of native smart contracts, and the fact that certain address types are not quantum vulnerable.

QWhat is the estimated value of the Bitcoins held in early P2PK addresses mentioned in the article?

AThe approximately 1.7 million Bitcoins in early P2PK addresses, including Satoshi's estimated 1 million BTC, are valued at over $68 billion.

QWhat are the three primary alternatives the Bitcoin community has for handling coins with unavailable private keys?

AThe three primary options are burning the coins, purposefully reducing the pace of spending from susceptible addresses, or doing nothing.

QWhat major Bitcoin-related controversy from 2023 did Pandl allude to in relation to community divisions?

AHe alluded to the major controversy involving Bitcoin Ordinals, a technology that allows imprinting data like text and pictures onto a satoshi, which erupted over the use of blockspace.

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2 h fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2 h fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist2 h fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist2 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 h fa

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ERA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Caldera (ERA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CalderaERA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Caldera (ERA)Dopo aver acquistato Caldera (ERA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Caldera (ERA)Scambia facilmente Caldera (ERA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

345 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.07.17Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ERA ERA sono presentate come di seguito.