Global Long-Term Bonds Break Down: The Fiscal Illusion of the Low-Interest Era is Collapsing

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-19

Introduzione

Global long-term bonds are experiencing a widespread breakdown, as the fiscal illusion of the low-interest-rate era collapses. Sovereign yields are hitting multi-year highs in the US, UK, Japan, and France, signaling a market repricing driven by a common reality: unsustainable debt and deficits outpacing economic growth, compounded by renewed inflationary pressures from energy shocks. The direct trigger is the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices higher and reignited inflation fears. This squeezes central bank policy space, with expectations shifting from future rate cuts to potential hikes. The core "fiscal Ponzi scheme" is becoming evident—governments rely on new debt to service existing obligations, but as growth lags and borrowing costs rise, investors demand higher yields. Key developments include the US 30-year yield surpassing 5% for the first time since 2007, with tepid auction demand; Japan's 30-year yield reaching 4%, threatening its long-standing low-rate financial system; and political paralysis in the UK and France making meaningful fiscal consolidation unlikely. The marginal buyer for US debt is also shifting from foreign central banks to more price-sensitive private investors. While debt managers may adjust issuance, fundamental drivers—deteriorating fiscal paths, persistent inflation, and constrained central banks—remain. The market is conclusively repricing the end of the low-interest-rate financing model for highly indebted develo...

Author: Claude, Shenchao TechFlow

Shenchao Insight: Long-term bonds in developed countries are collectively faltering. The market is no longer repricing the fiscal surprise of a single country, but rather the reality of high debt, high deficits, and even higher interest rates coexisting in the long term. As debt growth persistently outpaces economic growth, energy shocks rekindle inflation, and central banks' room for rate cuts is compressed, the "low-interest rollover model" that has supported developed countries' financing for over a decade is developing cracks.

Over the past week, the yield on the UK 30-year government bond rose to 5.82%, the highest since 1998; Japan's 30-year government bond yield hit 4%, a record high since its inception in 1999; the US 30-year Treasury yield surpassed 5% for the first time since 2007; France's 10-year bond yield climbed above 3.8%, also returning to levels last seen in 2007. This sell-off has already weighed on global stock markets, prompting G7 finance ministers to specifically discuss this bond rout at their meeting this week.

According to a report dated May 18 by Ajay Rajadhyaksha, head of Fixed Income, FX, and Commodities Research at Barclays, "Long bonds didn't just sell off last week, they broke out of ranges everywhere." The core judgment is that with debt growing faster than the economy, inflation paths worsening, and no political will for fiscal reform, there is insufficient reason to extend duration even as long bonds have already sold off.

Priya Misra, Portfolio Manager at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, issued a similar warning: "Rates are rising in unison across the long end of the globe, and they tend to reinforce each other, and expectations of Fed rate hikes are now entering the market narrative."

Multi-Country Bond Markets Break Down Simultaneously, Collective "Fiscal Ponzi Scheme" Comes to Light

A decline in a single country's bond market can often be attributed to local inflation, fiscal policies, politics, or central bank communication. However, the near-simultaneous breakdowns in the UK, Japan, the US, and France indicate the market is now trading more than just local risks.

The commonality is clear: major developed economies generally have debt-to-GDP ratios above 100%, and fiscal deficits are not covered by nominal growth. The US deficit is approximately $2 trillion, about 6.5% of GDP, with nominal growth around 4.5% to 5%; France's nominal GDP grew 2.2% year-on-year for the quarter ending March 2026, with a deficit around 5%; the UK's deficit exceeds 4%.

This is the core contradiction pointed to by the "fiscal Ponzi scheme": governments continuously rely on new debt and rollover financing to sustain spending, but the pace of debt expansion exceeds economic growth, while interest costs are becoming more expensive again. As long as this combination persists, long-term bonds require higher yields to attract buyers.

New spending is adding further pressure. NATO agreed in The Hague last year to raise its defense spending target to 5% of GDP by 2035; European defense spending already grew by double-digit percentages last year and may continue for a decade; the US government is requesting a $1.5 trillion defense budget for the next fiscal year. These expenditures lack corresponding offsetting cuts.

Strait of Hormuz Blockade, Oil Price Shock Reignites Inflation

Debt and deficits were already fragile; an energy price shock is further tightening the policy space. The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is the direct trigger for this bond market turmoil. The disruption of the world's most crucial oil shipping chokepoint has continuously pushed oil prices higher, reigniting inflation expectations.

Barclays' base case assumes Brent crude will average $100 in 2026, a 50% increase from the 2025 average. This would directly worsen the inflation outlook, compress central banks' room for rate cuts, and could even force them to hike rates. Higher rates mean existing debt interest payments will continue to rise, which in turn makes reducing deficits even more difficult. This resembles a fiscal ratchet mechanism—with each forward turn, the government's maneuvering room shrinks, and bond investors demand greater compensation.

J.P. Morgan Managing Director Priya Misra stated bluntly: "Unless the strait reopens, the rate range has shifted higher overall."

Looking at short-term data, the US 2-year yield briefly rose to 4.09%, the highest since February 2025; the 10-year yield stood at 4.58%, near a one-year high; US Treasuries overall have recorded negative returns year-to-date, whereas gains were nearly 2% as of late February.

Inflation Narrative Dominates the Market, Term Premium Being Repriced

The judgment from Karen Manna, Fixed Income Strategist and Portfolio Manager at Federated Hermes, is: "We are seeing a world that is truly dealing with a new inflation wave."

Kevin Flanagan, Head of Investment Strategy at WisdomTree, anticipates the next Consumer Price Index report may show annual inflation reaching 4%, the highest level since 2023. He directly points out the market logic: "The inflation narrative is dominating the market. The bond market is demanding a higher premium to hold newly issued Treasuries."

Last week's Treasury auctions confirmed this pricing: The 30-year auction rate hit 5%, the first since 2007, but demand was tepid; investor demand for the 3-year and 10-year auctions was also lukewarm. Even the rise in long-term bond yields to year-to-date highs is not, in itself, a sufficient reason to add duration.

Fed Path Completely Reverses, Bets Shift from Two Cuts to a March Hike

The inflation storm is reshaping expectations for the Federal Reserve's policy path. The environment facing incoming Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh is far from the "easing channel" envisioned by the market at the start of the year.

Traders now see a March hike next year as highly probable, with the odds of a hike by December around three-quarters; back at the end of February, the market was expecting two rate cuts in 2026. US Treasury yields are now about 50 basis points or more higher than their late-February levels.

Official commentary has further cemented hawkish pricing. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said last week that broad price pressures might even signal an overheating economy; Fed Governor Michael Barr called inflation the "overwhelming" risk facing the economy. The Fed's April meeting minutes will be released this Wednesday, and the market will closely watch how much support dissenting members garnered among officials.

The latest J.P. Morgan US Treasury Client Survey shows net short positions on Treasuries have risen to their highest level in 13 weeks, indicating a clear increase in market bets for further bond market declines.

Japan's Low-Rate System Being Repriced

Japan's 30-year government bond yield touching 4% may not be extreme in the US or UK, but it holds different significance for the Japanese market. For the past 20 years, Japan's long-term interest rates have hovered near zero, and the balance sheet structures of pension funds, insurance companies, and regional banks were built around this environment.

The Bank of Japan's policy rate is currently 0.75%. At the April policy meeting, three out of nine board members opposed the current stance; market pricing shows a 77% probability of a June rate hike. Even if the BOJ raises rates to 1%, real rates would remain significantly negative.

The rise in Japan's long-term yields can be interpreted as monetary policy normalization: the end of deflation, real wage growth, and the economy returning to a more normal state. However, the issue is that normalization may not be gentle for an economy with debt exceeding twice its GDP. A 4% yield on a 30-year Japanese bond is not just a change in a yield figure; it signifies the repricing of the entire low-interest-rate financial system.

UK, France: Political Structures Make Deficit Reduction Almost Impossible

The UK Labour government has a working majority of over 150 seats in the 650-seat parliament, theoretically possessing the capacity for fiscal adjustment. However, last summer, proposed savings of just £1.4 billion related to winter fuel subsidies sparked a backlash within the Labour parliamentary party.

Political pressure is mounting. Ninety-seven Labour MPs have demanded the Prime Minister resign or provide a departure timeline; main challenger Andy Burnham once argued fiscal policy should not submit to the bond market, later clarifying he would not completely ignore investors. The UK has had four prime ministers and five chancellors of the exchequer in the past four years. Bond market pricing indicates over 60 basis points of further rate hike potential for the Bank of England by year-end, although Governor Bailey may prefer to wait and see.

France's problem is less eye-catching than UK gilts, but its fiscal structure is equally tricky. France has had five prime ministers in less than three years. The current government has survived two no-confidence votes to push through a budget targeting a 5% of GDP deficit. The 2023 reform raising the retirement age to 64 is under attack, even though 64 is still below most Western economies. France's deficit is already significantly higher than its nominal GDP growth, voters will harshly punish austerity attempts, and constitutional arrangements make it easier for parliament to block spending cuts. Everyone knows the deficit must fall, but no one is willing to bear the political cost of reducing it.

US Buyer Structure Has Changed: Foreign Central Banks Turn to Gold, Private Investors Demand Higher Prices

The US 30-year Treasury yield surpassing 5% is the first time since 2007. The direct causes are rising inflation, fiscal expansion, and high deficits, but this is not new. The deeper change lies in the shifting marginal buyers.

The US federal deficit is approximately $2 trillion. The Congressional Budget Office projects that federal debt held by the public will rise from its current level of over 100% of GDP to 120% by 2036. However, this forecast may still be optimistic. A key variable is tariff revenue: The US effective tariff rate has fallen from a peak of 12% to between 7% and 8%, below the CBO's assumption of 15%. Even if it eventually rises to 10%, tariff revenue over the next decade would only be about 60% of the roughly $3 trillion deficit reduction assumed in its projections. Assumptions for defense spending and interest costs may also be too low.

The dollar's reserve currency status remains a structural advantage for the US, allowing it to finance at rates that peer debtors struggle to obtain. However, this does not mean a 6.5% deficit ratio is sustainable. Foreign central banks were once stable buyers of duration assets, but since the West froze Russia's foreign reserves, central bank allocations have shifted towards gold. Last year, gold's share in central bank reserves surpassed that of US Treasuries. Japan, the largest holder of US Treasuries, finds its domestic market rates more attractive. The Fed is still in quantitative tightening mode. Those stepping in to buy long-term bonds are price-sensitive private investors demanding higher term premiums.

The Fed is Not a "Fuse" for Long Bonds

Debt management offices have relatively reduced long-term bond issuance in recent years and may continue adjusting issuance structures, but this can only ease supply pressure, not change the fiscal and inflation direction.

Some in the market discuss whether the Fed might be forced to restart large-scale asset purchases to prevent long-end rates from rising further. However, Warsh's previous statement regarding the Fed's balance sheet was, "A bloated balance sheet could be meaningfully reduced," which is not language suggesting preparation for a US version of Yield Curve Control.

Faced with the ongoing sell-off, some investors choose to stay on the sidelines. WisdomTree analyst Kevin Flanagan said he currently maintains holdings in floating rate notes and keeps interest rate exposure low, "preferring to buy later rather than too early." He views the 4.5% level on the 10-year yield as "more of a psychological barrier," and if Middle East tensions escalate again and push oil prices higher, yields could retest last year's high of 4.62%. Hank Smith, Head of Investment Strategy at Haverford Trust, holds a more cautious view, stating that it remains an unresolved question whether the rise in consumer and producer prices is temporary "or will persist into 2027."

The forces driving the sell-off—fiscal deterioration, increased defense spending, sticky inflation, and constrained central banks—are not disappearing in a week or two. Unless economic data weakens significantly or credible changes emerge in fiscal paths, developed market long bonds are still trading on the same issue: the low-interest financing model of the high-debt era is being repriced by the market.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core reason for the simultaneous sell-off in long-term bonds across major developed economies like the US, UK, Japan, and France, according to the article?

AThe article argues the core reason is a market reassessment of the 'low-interest-rate rolling model' due to a common reality of high debt, high deficits, and persistent higher interest rates. Key drivers are debt growing faster than economic growth, energy shocks reigniting inflation, and central banks having less room to cut rates, which forces markets to demand higher yields to compensate.

QHow did the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz contribute to the bond market turmoil described in the article?

AThe blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil transit route, pushed oil prices higher, reigniting inflation expectations. This energy price shock further compressed the policy space for central banks, potentially forcing them to raise rates. Higher interest rates increase government debt servicing costs, widening deficits and forcing bond investors to demand even higher yields, creating a vicious cycle.

QWhat significant shift has occurred in the market's expectation for Federal Reserve policy, as mentioned in the text?

AThe market's expectation for the Federal Reserve's policy path has completely reversed. At the end of February, the market anticipated two rate cuts in 2026. Now, traders view a rate hike in March of the coming year as highly likely, with about a 75% probability of a hike by December. This shift is driven by renewed and persistent inflation pressures.

QWhy is Japan's 30-year government bond yield reaching 4% considered particularly significant, despite being lower than similar yields in the US or UK?

AA 4% yield for Japan's 30-year bond is highly significant because Japan's financial system has been built around near-zero interest rates for over two decades. Pensions, insurers, and regional banks structured their balance sheets based on this environment. Therefore, this rise represents a fundamental repricing of Japan's entire low-interest-rate financial architecture, which is challenging for an economy with debt exceeding 200% of GDP.

QAccording to the article, what are the two key changes in the buyer structure for US Treasury bonds that are contributing to higher long-term yields?

ATwo key changes in the US Treasury buyer structure are: 1) Foreign central banks, traditional stable buyers of duration, are shifting reserves towards gold and away from US Treasuries, partly due to geopolitical factors like the freezing of Russian reserves. 2) The marginal buyers are now more price-sensitive private investors who demand higher term premiums (compensation for holding long-term debt), as opposed to less price-sensitive official buyers. The Fed is also reducing its balance sheet (quantitative tightening).

Letture associate

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手28 min fa

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手28 min fa

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit1 h fa

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit1 h fa

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

In the week of May 15-19, 2026, U.S. long-term Treasury yields surged to multi-year highs, with the 30-year yield hitting 5.2%, a level unseen since 2007, and the 10-year yield climbing to 4.687%. Equity markets declined in response. Four primary factors are driving the rise in yields. First, stubborn inflation persists, with April wholesale prices rising 6% year-over-year, fueling expectations of potential future Fed rate hikes instead of cuts. Second, newly confirmed Fed Chair Kevin Warsh inherits a complex inflation battle, with markets closely awaiting his first FOMC meeting. Third, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health, marked by large deficits and rising debt servicing costs, is eroding the traditional "safe-haven" premium for Treasuries. Fourth, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax cuts are projected to add trillions to the national debt, contributing to Moody's recent credit rating downgrade. Rising yields pressure stocks through several channels: a higher discount rate reduces the present value of future earnings (especially for growth stocks); rising risk-free rates compress equity risk premiums, making bonds relatively more attractive; higher borrowing costs impact consumers and corporations; and a stronger dollar affects multinational earnings. For investors, the environment favors value and financial stocks over long-duration growth stocks. Bond investors find attractive yields in short to intermediate maturities, while income investors see the best fixed-income opportunities in over a decade. Key developments to watch include Chair Warsh's first FOMC meeting, upcoming inflation data, Treasury auction demand, and whether the 30-year yield approaches 6%, a level that could trigger a more sustained equity valuation reset. The bond market's message is clear: the era of cheap government borrowing is over, posing a central challenge for markets in late 2026.

marsbit1 h fa

Deficits, Inflation, and the New Fed: The Deep Logic Behind US Bond Yields Breaking 5% and the Market Reset

marsbit1 h fa

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

The article "Is Strategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Decoding 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment" analyzes why companies might sell their bitcoin holdings, arguing it's not necessarily negative. It begins by noting the market's surprise at Strategy's potential sale, contrasting its previous "never sell" stance. The core argument is that corporate decisions prioritize shareholder value, and selling bitcoin can be a rational strategic choice. The article outlines five key financial reasons for such sales: 1. **Increase Bitcoin Holdings Per Share:** Companies can use proceeds from bitcoin sales to repurchase shares when the stock price is undervalued relative to its bitcoin assets. This reduces the outstanding share count, potentially increasing the bitcoin amount backing each remaining share. 2. **Optimize Capital Structure & Reduce Financing Costs:** Building cash reserves through bitcoin sales can improve credit ratings (as favored by agencies like S&P), leading to lower future borrowing costs. Repaying debt with sale proceeds also reduces financial leverage. 3. **Legitimate Tax Planning:** In the absence of wash-sale rules for bitcoin in the US, companies can sell to realize capital losses, then repurchase, lowering the tax basis of their holdings and creating tax offsets. 4. **Counter Negative Market Narratives:** A controlled, non-disruptive sale could demonstrate market resilience and disprove fears that corporate selling would crash the market, thereby normalizing bitcoin as a corporate treasury asset. 5. **Repurchase Preferred Stock at a Discount:** If a company's preferred stock trades significantly below its face value, using bitcoin sale proceeds to repurchase it can retire expensive liabilities at a profit, saving on future dividend payments. The conclusion emphasizes that bitcoin's monetary properties offer flexibility. Strategic sales can protect corporate and shareholder interests, making asset utilization more important than rigid "hold" mandates.

marsbit1 h fa

Is MicroStrategy Selling Bitcoin Not a Bearish Signal? Deconstructing the 5 Financial Logics Behind Corporate Bitcoin Divestment

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare ERA

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Caldera (ERA) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente CalderaERA.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Caldera (ERA)Dopo aver acquistato Caldera (ERA), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Caldera (ERA)Scambia facilmente Caldera (ERA) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

335 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2025.07.17Aggiornato il 2025.07.17

Come comprare ERA

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di ERA ERA sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片