GameStop Exits and Runs Away, Saylor Is Still Buying

比推Pubblicato 2026-02-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-04

Introduzione

Ryan Cohen, CEO of GameStop, announced the company is divesting its entire Bitcoin holdings of approximately 4,710 BTC (worth around $450 million), transferring them to Coinbase Prime, signaling an intent to sell. This move comes less than a year after GameStop initially invested $513 million in Bitcoin, which represented only about 10.4% of its cash reserves at the time—characterized more as a speculative trial rather than a core strategic commitment. In contrast, Michael Saylor and MicroStrategy continue to aggressively accumulate Bitcoin, even during market downturns, demonstrating a deeply held conviction in the asset. While MicroStrategy’s approach has been all-in, leveraging debt to buy more Bitcoin during dips, GameStop’s exit reflects a lack of long-term belief in Bitcoin as a treasury asset. The divergence highlights a broader trend: the initial “corporate Bitcoin treasury” strategy—where companies buy Bitcoin to potentially boost stock performance—is losing steam as the market corrects. Analysts suggest the space may consolidate, evolve into more sophisticated financial strategies, or see Bitcoin downgraded to a high-risk alternative asset rather than a revolutionary balance sheet choice. GameStop is now pivoting toward becoming a diversified investment holding company, with ambitions to grow into a $100 billion+ enterprise, possibly through acquisitions. The episode underscores a divide between short-term speculators and long-term believers like Saylor, who cont...

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: GameStop Exits and Runs Away, Saylor Is Still Buying


"This strategy is more attractive than Bitcoin."

GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen sat in front of CNBC's camera and said this in an almost casual tone. As if what he had just decided was not to abandon a $500 million investment, but to change the lunch menu.

But in the crypto market, this statement is as devastating as a bomb.

According to data from on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant, GameStop transferred all of its Bitcoin holdings to Coinbase Prime around January 23, with a total of approximately 4,710 coins transferred, worth about $450 million.

This move, in the eyes of crypto veterans, has only one meaning: preparing to sell.

Next, Cohen gave back-to-back interviews with The Wall Street Journal and CNBC. In the interviews, he talked extensively about acquisition plans, vowing to turn GameStop into an investment holding platform "similar to Berkshire Hathaway." When reporters pressed him on the Bitcoin strategy, he dropped that line.

Ironic?

From entry to preparing to exit, less than a year.

The End of an Imitation Show

On February 8, 2025, Cohen met with Michael Saylor, co-founder of MicroStrategy.

Saylor was at the peak of his life at the time. He changed his Twitter bio to "Bitcoin Maximalist" and posted long sermons about Bitcoin every day.

He said on a podcast that Bitcoin is a "technological phoenix" that will be reborn from the ashes of traditional finance.

According to a Cryptopolitan report, MicroStrategy held Bitcoin worth over $47 billion at the time.

This meeting sparked market speculation that GameStop might follow MicroStrategy's lead and add Bitcoin to its balance sheet. GameStop's stock price rose 4% that day.

What did Cohen learn? At least he learned how to build momentum.

Three months later, GameStop announced its entry. According to a Reuters report, GameStop spent $513 million to buy 4,710 Bitcoin, with an average cost of about $108,917.

The news caused a brief spike in the stock price.

But a closer look at this transaction reveals problems.

According to the financial report as of February 1, 2025, GameStop had approximately $4.8 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. $500 million in Bitcoin? That's only 10.4% of the cash reserves.

This isn't All In, it's a test.

And Saylor? During the same period, he leveraged almost MicroStrategy's entire balance sheet and kept issuing debt to buy more on leverage. That's faith. What Cohen did was pure speculation.

"Judging from the capital ratio, subsequent actions, and communication style, Bitcoin seems more like an option rather than a core identity anchor," said an analyst who wished to remain anonymous. "Saylor bet the entire company. Cohen? He bought a little and then did nothing."

In the third quarter of 2025, Bitcoin prices were still high.

GameStop did not increase its holdings.

MicroStrategy was buying almost every week.

The gap was set here.

The Two Sides of the Flywheel

To understand why GameStop is running, you must first understand the rules of this game.

The core logic of the corporate Bitcoin treasury strategy can be summarized in one word: flywheel.

Issue stock to raise money, buy Bitcoin, the coin's rise pushes up the market cap, a higher market cap allows for issuing more stock, buying more Bitcoin, and so the cycle repeats.

In a bull market, this is a money-printing machine.

From MicroStrategy's first purchase in August 2020 to the end of 2025, its stock price increased by 12.29 times. Bitcoin rose about 6.37 times in the same period, while the S&P 500 only rose 115%.

The effect was astonishing. In 2025, nearly 200 listed companies rushed in, stuffing Bitcoin into their balance sheets. According to K33's H1 report, in the first half of 2025 alone, Bitcoin treasury companies purchased 244,991 Bitcoin, bringing in tens of billions of dollars in capital inflows.

But the flywheel has a fatal characteristic: it can spin in reverse.

In October 2025, Bitcoin hit an all-time high of about $126,000. Then it started to fall.

By the end of December, $87,500. A drop of over 30%.

The flywheel began to operate in reverse: coin falls, market cap falls, stock price falls below net asset value, unable to issue new shares at a premium, no money to buy more coins, investor confidence collapses, market cap continues to fall.

MicroStrategy's market cap plummeted from a premium of about 3 times the net value of its Bitcoin holdings. By December 2025, analysis on Reddit claimed it was already at an 11% discount.

Not a premium. A discount.

The market no longer believed the flywheel would keep spinning.

What did Saylor do at this time?

From December 29, 2025, to January 4, 2026, while Bitcoin was still in a downward trend and the company's stock price had halved from its peak, he announced the purchase of another 1,286 Bitcoin.

He stated: "The drop in Bitcoin price is a gift. Every drop is a buying opportunity."

And Cohen?

He transferred the coins to an exchange.

Facing paper losses:

MicroStrategy added to its position. GameStop prepared to run.

The difference lies not in financial condition, but in belief.

Three Paths

"The era of premium is over," said John Fakhoury, a senior analyst at Stacking Sats, in a market report. Surviving in this field requires two things: discipline and actual business execution capabilities.

Those who leave lack the former; those who stay need to prove the latter.

GameStop? At least on the path of Bitcoin treasury, it neither chose to bind its identity long-term nor established a sustainable execution mechanism.

So, what will the future hold?

Based on feasibility speculation, this field may evolve along three paths.

First, integration and concentration. The weak leave, the strong harvest. According to Galaxy Digital's 2026 crypto market outlook report, at least 5 Bitcoin treasury companies will sell their Bitcoin holdings or shut down completely this year. Where will these Bitcoins go? Some will be absorbed by ETFs and retail investors, some will be acquired at a discount by giants like MicroStrategy. In the end, only a few companies may dominate the entire field.

Second, model evolution. The simple "buy and hold" has failed. Some companies are beginning to explore how to generate cash flow without selling, and will subsequently try options trading, Bitcoin lending, structured products, etc. But this requires professional capability, which most followers lack.

Third, narrative downgrade. Bitcoin is downgraded from a "revolutionary corporate asset allocation choice" to "a highly volatile alternative asset." It can be allocated, but not worth All In; it can be tried, but should not be a core strategy.

However, Ryan Cohen is taking a fourth path: a complete pivot.

His goal is to transform GameStop into an enterprise worth over $100 billion, with businesses far beyond selling video games and collectibles. Based on the current market cap of about $11.5 billion, the stock price needs to increase 8.7 times.

Cohen is ambitious about this. To achieve this goal, he is considering acquiring a listed company.

When the Tide Goes Out

Let's zoom the lens out a bit.

Saylor believes Bitcoin is the most important asset innovation in human history, a drop is just noise, and he will buy until his last breath.

Cohen says, thank you, but I see something more attractive.

If Bitcoin rises to $500,000 in five years, Saylor becomes a legend, and Cohen becomes "the one who sold at the bottom."

If Bitcoin falls into a long-term bear market, Cohen's timely exit is seen as wise, while Saylor needs to pay about $700 million annually in preferred stock dividends and bond interest.

Who is right and who is wrong?

Time will tell.

But one thing is certain: GameStop's Bitcoin experiment will most likely become a footnote. Years from now, when people look back on this history, they will remember Saylor, they will remember the true believers who kept buying in the darkest hours.

As for those followers who come and go in a flash?

The market never lacks such characters. When the tide goes out, they are always the first to run.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7608677

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the main reason for GameStop's decision to sell its Bitcoin holdings according to the article?

AGameStop's CEO Ryan Cohen indicated that he found another strategy more attractive than Bitcoin, and the company was pivoting towards transforming into an investment holding platform similar to Berkshire Hathaway, suggesting a lack of long-term belief in Bitcoin as a core asset.

QHow did Michael Saylor's approach to Bitcoin differ from Ryan Cohen's based on the article?

AMichael Saylor demonstrated strong belief by heavily leveraging his company's balance sheet to continuously buy Bitcoin, even during price declines, while Ryan Cohen treated it as a speculative investment, allocating only a small portion of cash reserves and selling during market downturns.

QWhat is the 'flywheel effect' mentioned in the article regarding corporate Bitcoin treasury strategy?

AThe 'flywheel effect' refers to a cycle where companies issue stock to raise funds, buy Bitcoin, which pushes up the market value, allowing them to issue more stock and buy more Bitcoin. This works positively in a bull market but can reverse in a bear market, causing declining valuations and loss of investor confidence.

QWhat are the three possible evolutionary paths for corporate Bitcoin treasury strategies as suggested in the article?

AThe three paths are: 1) Consolidation and concentration, where weaker companies sell holdings and stronger ones acquire them; 2) Model evolution, exploring ways to generate cash flow without selling, like options trading or lending; 3) Narrative downgrade, where Bitcoin becomes viewed as a high-volatility alternative asset rather than a revolutionary corporate strategy.

QWhat does the article imply about the future perception of GameStop's Bitcoin experiment?

AThe article suggests that GameStop's Bitcoin experiment will likely become a footnote in history, with true believers like Michael Saylor being remembered, while short-term followers like GameStop are seen as those who quickly exit when market conditions worsen.

Letture associate

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit11 min fa

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit11 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 h fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片