FTX Co-Founder Bankman-Fried Requests Trump Pardon–FTT Soars 45%

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-06-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-08

Introduzione

Sam Bankman-Fried, the convicted former CEO of bankrupt crypto exchange FTX, has formally requested a presidential pardon from Donald Trump. He confirmed the move in an interview, stating he "absolutely" wants clemency. In March 2024, Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years for fraud and conspiracy linked to FTX's collapse, which caused billions in losses for customers and investors. Despite his conviction, he maintains the case was unfair, claiming FTX customers have now been repaid with interest. Following news of his pardon bid, FTX's native token, FTT, surged 45% in price, though it remains 99.5% below its all-time high.

Sam Bankman-Fried, the co-founder and former CEO of the collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, moved forward with a new legal effort on Monday by filing a request for a presidential pardon from President Trump.

Bankman-Fried’s Pardon Bid

Bloomberg reported that Bankman-Fried submitted an application to the Office of the Pardon Attorney within the US Department of Justice (DOJ), seeking what the site describes as a “pardon after completion of sentence.”

Later on Monday, during an exclusive conversation with FOX Business correspondent Susan Li, Bankman-Fried said he “absolutely” wants a presidential pardon. When Li asked whether he would expect to seek one from the White House, he agreed.

“Absolutely,” he said, adding that the decision ultimately rests with the president rather than him. Asked if his family or people he has been in contact with are lobbying the administration on his behalf, the FTX co-founder declined to confirm, stating, “I can’t speak for them.”

In March 2024, Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison after a jury found him guilty on two counts of wire fraud and five counts of conspiracy tied to the fall of his crypto empire.

The court also concluded that FTX customers lost $8 billion, equity investors associated with FTX lost $1.7 billion, and lenders to the Alameda Research hedge fund—Bankman-Fried’s firm—lost $1.3 billion.

FTX Token Rallies 45%

Despite the conviction and long sentence, Bankman-Fried has continued to argue that the case against him was unfair. He told Li that he believes FTX customers have ultimately been repaid and pointed to improvements in bankruptcy outcomes that he said have been helped, at least in part, by a recovery in cryptocurrency markets.

“I didn’t steal user funds either,” he said, adding that customers have been repaid, “now 170% or so on their deposits.” He described the situation as one of the few cases where the platform was reportedly over-collateralized—meaning customers were more than fully made whole—yet he said prosecutors still pursued criminal charges.

Notably, the move sparked a major surge in the price of FTX’s native token, FTT. On Monday, it recorded a massive 45% rally, reaching around $0.33 by the time this piece was written. However, the token’s recovery still leaves it 99.5% below its all-time high of $84, which was reached at the peak of the exchange’s operations.

The 1-D chart shows FTT’s price rally on Monday. Source: FTTUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com

Domande pertinenti

QWhat legal action did Sam Bankman-Fried take on Monday, and from whom did he request it?

ASam Bankman-Fried filed a request for a presidential pardon from President Trump with the Office of the Pardon Attorney within the US Department of Justice.

QWhat was the reason for Sam Bankman-Fried's 25-year prison sentence in March 2024?

AHe was sentenced to 25 years in prison after being found guilty on two counts of wire fraud and five counts of conspiracy related to the collapse of FTX.

QAccording to the court, what were the financial losses for FTX customers, equity investors, and Alameda Research lenders?

AFTX customers lost $8 billion, equity investors lost $1.7 billion, and lenders to Alameda Research lost $1.3 billion.

QHow did Sam Bankman-Fried defend himself regarding the use of customer funds, and what repayment claim did he make?

AHe stated, 'I didn’t steal user funds either,' and claimed that customers have been repaid 'now 170% or so on their deposits.'

QHow did the news of Bankman-Fried's pardon request affect the price of FTX's native token, FTT?

AThe price of FTT surged by 45% on Monday, reaching around $0.33, though it remains 99.5% below its all-time high of $84.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit7 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit7 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit26 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit26 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit35 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit35 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片