From Competing on Experience to Building Assets: Hyperliquid is Moving Ahead of CEXs

比推Pubblicato 2026-01-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-28

Introduzione

Amidst a general market stagnation, Hyperliquid ($HYPE) has demonstrated notable independent growth, signaling a shift in the Perp DEX narrative. Rather than competing solely on user experience akin to centralized exchanges (CEXs), Hyperliquid is expanding into synthetic assets—including commodities like crude oil, precious metals, and foreign currencies—through its HIP-3 protocol. This positions it not just as a decentralized exchange, but as a crypto-native, Nasdaq-like platform for global asset trading. The move reflects a broader trend of on-chain liquidity integrating with real-world assets, a direction also being explored by major CEXs like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit. Hyperliquid’s advantages include narrower spreads, faster execution, and 24/7 availability compared to traditional platforms. It leverages on-chain transparency, permissionless listings, and fee redistribution to challenge the opaque, centralized models of CEXs and traditional finance—focusing on code-based trust rather than decentralization rhetoric.

Author: Haotian

Original Title: While CEXs Are Still Competing on Experience, Hyperliquid Is Already Trading Precious Metals and Forex

While mainstream assets remain stagnant, $HYPE's independent bullish surge is indeed thought-provoking. Many are asking why the Perp DEX sector has been quiet lately, but @HyperliquidX's performance has already provided the answer:

1) The narrative ceiling has shifted. The old story of Perp DEXs approaching CEX-level experience is no longer compelling. It seems Hyperliquid is breaking away from the internal competition of being a "user-friendly DEX" and is expanding into a full range of synthetic assets through the HIP-3 protocol.

It is transitioning from the goal of outperforming CEXs as a user-friendly DEX to becoming a chain-based Nasdaq narrative that best serves Crypto Native users. The shift from pure Crypto speculation to seamless trading of crude oil, forex, and precious metals directly elevates the vision;

2) The "reverse flow" of on-chain liquidity into real-world assets. Observing exchanges like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit building platforms around the "asset tokenization" narrative indicates that the growth ceiling for pure Crypto assets has been reached.

Don’t doubt it—when you find that the spread for trading silver on-chain is narrower than on CEXs, the response is faster than brokers, and it operates 24/7 without interruption, it ceases to be just a DEX and transforms into an all-weather global asset routing hub. This is an inevitable outcome of on-chain liquidity beginning to reverse-flow into real-world assets. Whoever takes the lead in championing this will emerge as the winner;

3) A dimensional shift in rule-making. In the past, Perp DEXs were imitating and trying to match the experience of CEXs, but Hyperliquid has clearly elevated the game. The new rule logic includes absolute on-chain transparency, permissionless listing, fee rebate mechanisms, and other emerging market rules.

Ultimately, it uses code-based trust to dismantle the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi. Interestingly, decentralization isn’t even mentioned.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7606559

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main narrative shift that Hyperliquid is undergoing according to the article?

AHyperliquid is shifting from being a 'user-friendly DEX' focused on competing with CEXs in crypto perpetual trading to becoming a 'chain-based Nasdaq' narrative, expanding into synthetic assets like crude oil, foreign exchange, and precious metals to attract broader asset trading.

QHow does Hyperliquid's new strategy represent a 'dimensional reduction attack' on traditional rules?

AHyperliquid uses code-based trust to eliminate the black-box advantages of CEXs and TradFi by offering absolute on-chain transparency, permissionless listing of new assets, and fee rebate mechanisms, rather than merely imitating CEX user experience.

QWhat advantage does Hyperliquid claim over CEXs when trading assets like silver?

AHyperliquid claims to offer narrower price spreads, faster response times than brokers, and 24/7 non-stop trading for assets like silver, making it an all-weather global asset routing hub rather than just a DEX.

QWhy are exchanges like Bitget, OKX, and Bybit moving towards 'asset tokenization' narratives?

AThey recognize the growth bottleneck of pure crypto assets and are exploring asset tokenization to leverage on-chain liquidity to integrate real-world assets, a trend that Hyperliquid is pioneering.

QWhat key feature of Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol supports its expansion into synthetic assets?

AHIP-3 protocol enables Hyperliquid to offer permissionless listing and trading of synthetic assets, including commodities and forex, facilitating its transition to a full-chain asset trading platform.

Letture associate

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

The meme coin competition is shifting from community hype to technological and ecosystem advantages. This analysis contrasts Bonk, an established token on the Solana network known for its speed and low costs, with the newer Little Pepe ($LILPEPE), currently in its presale phase. Bonk leverages its mature community and Solana's infrastructure, while Little Pepe differentiates itself with a Layer 2 Ethereum solution promising tax-free trading, staking rewards, and enhanced scalability. To drive engagement, Little Pepe is offering substantial giveaways totaling $777,000. Both coins, despite their different strategies—Bonk as a proven ecosystem and Little Pepe as an early-stage utility project—are capturing significant market attention as demand surges.

TheNewsCrypto46 min fa

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

TheNewsCrypto46 min fa

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

A US law enforcement task force has frozen over $700 million in cryptocurrency linked to investment scams targeting Americans. The operation, which involved cooperation from crypto exchanges and legal processes, also took down more than 500 fraudulent websites and a Telegram channel used to recruit victims. Two Chinese nationals were named in arrest warrants for operating a scam compound in Burma. In a related move, the US State Department announced a $10 million reward for information disrupting scam centers in Burma. Singaporean authorities, alongside major crypto exchanges and analytics firms, also prevented nearly $3 million in losses through a parallel operation. The scale of cybercrime remains vast, with the FBI reporting over $20 billion in losses in 2025.

bitcoinist1 h fa

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

bitcoinist1 h fa

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that the Toncoin (TON) network will reduce transaction fees by six times in one week, lowering the cost to just 0.00039 TON (approximately $0.0005). This fee reduction is part of the "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) roadmap and will remain fixed regardless of network congestion. The update follows a recent upgrade that made the network 10 times faster and transactions nearly instant. Durov also hinted that future steps aim to make most transactions fully feeless. Although Telegram discontinued formal involvement with TON due to regulatory issues, Durov remains a strong supporter. Currently, Toncoin is trading around $1.30, down over 8% in the past week.

bitcoinist2 h fa

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

bitcoinist2 h fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 h fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures