France Cracks Down Hard on Polymarket, 30 Countries Follow, Forcing EU to Redefine Prediction Markets

Foresight NewsPubblicato 2026-07-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-21

Introduzione

French gambling regulator ANJ has ordered nationwide ISP blocking of Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market platform, escalating a four-year regulatory battle. ANJ classified it as illegal gambling rather than an unlicensed crypto exchange, focusing on consumer harm instead of financial market risks. This distinction carries significant legal implications and may influence other EU regulators. Despite a 2024 ban on financial transactions, Similarweb data showed over 205,000 unique French visitors in June 2026, prompting the site-blocking order. Investigations cite alleged weather data manipulation affecting contracts and a trader ("Fredi9999") suspected of manipulating odds for the 2024 US election. ANJ justifies the ban by highlighting the platform's lack of mandatory consumer protection features like betting limits and self-exclusion tools. Over 30 countries have restricted Polymarket. As the largest EU economy, France's move sets a potential precedent. Its classification conflicts with the EU's MiCA framework, which treats such markets as crypto assets. If adopted EU-wide, this could lead to blanket bans under gambling laws, diverging from the financial regulatory path taken by compliant platforms like US-based Kalshi. The effectiveness of France's block and the outcome of related legal cases will be closely watched by other EU members.


Source: Blockhead

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News


France's National Gaming Authority (ANJ) has now ordered all domestic internet service providers to block access to Polymarket. This is a prediction trading platform that allows users to use cryptocurrency to bet on the outcomes of real-world events.


This official ban was formally issued by France's National Gaming Authority on July 16th, escalating a four-year regulatory battle with unprecedentedly tough enforcement measures. The core rationale for this control focuses primarily on the harm the platform causes to ordinary users, rather than risks to financial market order.


This classification is crucial: the regulatory body did not categorize Polymarket as an unlicensed cryptocurrency exchange but instead directly identified it as an illegal gambling operation, grouping it in the same regulatory category as unlicensed online casinos and sports betting platforms. The two classifications correspond to vastly different legal constraints and enforcement measures, which will profoundly influence the regulatory approaches of authorities in other European countries.


The Data Behind the Regulatory Escalation


France previously issued regulations in November 2024 prohibiting users within its territory from transacting funds with Polymarket, but this measure proved largely ineffective. The French National Gaming Authority cited data from traffic analysis platform Similarweb showing that in June 2026 alone, the platform had 205,057 unique visitors from France, with total visits reaching 578,751. Users could easily bypass the fund transfer restrictions simply by using a Virtual Private Network (VPN). The Authority concluded that only directly blocking the website's domain name could achieve effective control.


The regulator also listed two lines of investigation into violations: France's meteorological service, Météo-France, filed a complaint alleging that someone tampered with temperature sensor data to manipulate weather-related prediction contracts on Polymarket; the Paris prosecutor's cybercrime unit has opened a formal investigation into this on May 4th. In addition, regulators are closely monitoring a French trader with the account name 'Fredi9999', who allegedly manipulated odds for bets related to the 2024 US presidential election by holding large positions, and is now under investigation by French authorities.


As early as February 2026, France's National Gaming Authority had already reclassified such prediction markets as illegal gambling. The rationale was that these platforms lacked the mandatory risk protection mechanisms required for legal gambling institutions in France: betting limits and user self-exclusion pathways, thus failing to ensure consumer safety.


What This Means for the Entire Industry


France is not alone in restricting Polymarket; currently, over 30 countries and regions worldwide have implemented controls on the platform: Switzerland was the first to block the website in November 2024; Poland, Singapore, and Belgium followed with restrictions in early 2025; Portugal introduced control measures in January 2026; Spain issued a temporary blocking order and launched a simultaneous investigation in May of the same year. Brazil, Argentina, India, Indonesia, as well as Italy, Germany, Romania, Hungary, and Ukraine have all introduced related restrictive policies.


But France is the largest economy in the EU and the first member state to mandate a nationwide uniform website block by all operators. Official documents repeatedly mention the platform's addictive nature and harm to consumers, using phrasing identical to that employed when regulating loot boxes and other grey-area gambling products.


The more profound impact of this event lies in whether this regulatory standard will be implemented across the entire EU. France's classification of prediction markets under gambling, rather than as financial instruments or information services, creates a clear conflict with the EU's current regulatory framework under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). If other EU member states follow France's judgment logic, crypto prediction markets could face a uniform ban across the EU under gambling laws, rather than being regulated compliantly under financial market regulations. This runs counter to the long-term compliant development path laid out by the US-regulated prediction platform Kalshi.


Kalshi is a compliant prediction market regulated by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), currently expanding its US institutional business and had previously planned to enter the European market. If the EU uniformly classifies such platforms as gambling ventures, its European expansion plans would face significant obstacles — not necessarily that European users would be completely unable to access it, but the platform's regulatory positioning and brand image would become fundamentally misaligned with its US domestic operations.


At this stage, France serves as a test case for EU regulation. If the operator blocking measures significantly reduce domestic traffic, and if the meteorological data tampering case results in a successful prosecution, other EU regulators will closely reference this case when formulating their own control plans.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the core reason for France's regulatory crackdown on Polymarket according to the article?

AThe core reason is the platform's harm to ordinary users, not financial market risks. French regulator ANJ has classified it as illegal gambling, focusing on consumer protection risks like addiction, lack of betting limits, and self-exclusion tools, rather than treating it as an unlicensed crypto exchange.

QWhat was the previous French measure against Polymarket in 2024, and why did the authorities escalate to a website ban?

AIn November 2024, France banned financial transactions between domestic users and Polymarket. This measure proved ineffective, as data showed hundreds of thousands of French visits in June 2026, with users easily bypassing restrictions using VPNs. The regulator concluded that only a direct website domain block could achieve effective control.

QWhat are the two specific examples of potential manipulation on Polymarket mentioned by the French regulator?

AFirst, a complaint from the French meteorological service Météo-France about tampered temperature sensor data to manipulate weather-related prediction contracts. Second, the regulator is investigating a French trader using the handle 'Fredi9999' for allegedly using large positions to artificially alter odds on contracts related to the 2024 US election.

QWhat is a potential broader regulatory implication for the EU highlighted in the article?

AThe article highlights that if other EU member states follow France's lead in classifying prediction markets as gambling rather than financial instruments or information services, these platforms could be uniformly banned across the EU under gambling laws. This conflicts with the existing MiCA framework and would diverge from the compliance path of platforms like the US-regulated Kalshi, potentially blocking its European expansion.

QWhy is France considered a test case for EU regulation on prediction markets?

AFrance is considered an EU regulatory test case because it is the largest EU economy and the first member state to order a nationwide ISP-level website block. The outcome—specifically whether the block significantly reduces domestic traffic and if the weather data tampering case leads to a successful prosecution—will be closely watched by other EU regulators as they formulate their own control measures.

Letture associate

9.42 Million Retail Investors Compete for Changxin Technology, Who Got Allotted?

Evergreen Technology's IPO subscription results are now available. On July 20, the domestic memory chip giant announced the offline preliminary allotment results and online lottery results for its IPO. A total of approximately 9.43 million retail investors participated in the online subscription, generating 770,000 winning lots with a final winning rate of about 0.4714%, setting a record for new shares on the STAR Market. After triggering a clawback mechanism from institutional to retail investors, the online retail allocation was significantly increased to 3.851 billion shares. Simultaneously, 285 institutional investors participated in the offline subscription, ultimately receiving 2.173 billion shares at an allotment rate of approximately 0.1756%. Leading insurers and public funds were among the major recipients. Notably, Liang Wenfeng, founder of the major AI model company DeepSeek, through his quantitative investment firms Ningbo Huanfang Quantitative and Zhejiang Jiuzhang Asset, secured the largest share among private funds, with a total allotment worth approximately 175 million yuan. Estimates suggest potential profits could reach 730 million yuan if Evergreen Technology's market capitalization reaches 3 trillion yuan post-listing. The company is expected to list on July 27 and could become the highest-valued tech stock on the A-share market, with various brokerages providing valuations ranging from 1 trillion to over 4 trillion yuan. However, recent significant corrections in global tech stocks may impact its post-listing performance. (Character count: 1,196)

marsbit40 min fa

9.42 Million Retail Investors Compete for Changxin Technology, Who Got Allotted?

marsbit40 min fa

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

The article discusses the evolving relationship between Ethereum's Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions, moving beyond the initial "L2 for scaling" model. As Ethereum L1 itself scales (increasing Gas Limit, statelessness, zkEVM), the unique value proposition of L2s shifts from merely providing cheap execution to offering differentiated features like application-specific optimization, privacy, and flexible governance. The piece explores three key themes: 1. **L2's New Role:** L2s are transitioning from a pure scaling technology to a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum L1. 2. **Interoperability as State Trust:** Solving L2 fragmentation is less about cross-chain bridges and more about enabling faster, trust-minimized state verification between environments. This involves initiatives like faster L1 finality, intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), and native account abstraction. 3. **Blurring Layers:** With the potential integration of zk-proofs into L1 validation (making L1 akin to its own "Rollup") and the concept of "Native Rollups," the rigid boundary between L1 and L2 may fade. The future could be a unified system with multiple execution domains (for DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.) sharing a common security, settlement, and state framework. In conclusion, Ethereum's goal is not to abandon L2s or re-centralize everything on L1, but to re-integrate the fragmented user experience—liquidity, accounts, applications—while preserving the scaling benefits of a multi-environment ecosystem. The endgame is a cohesive "one chain" feeling for users, powered by diverse but securely interconnected execution layers.

marsbit1 h fa

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片