Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Experience Points in Using Claude Code

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-08

Introduzione

Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Claude Code Usage Experiences The author shares personal insights from using Claude Code. Key recommendations include: focusing deeply on one primary tool; mastering essential shortcuts like Control+G for the editor; utilizing voice input; starting projects with a structured PROJECT.md; defaulting to Claude agents; integrating with GitHub and Cloudflare for infrastructure; clearly separating human-written core files (like CLAUDE.md) from AI-generated content, and interacting with AI output only through queries; dragging various files (audio, video, screenshots) into the interface for clarification. He advises centralizing and version-controlling memory and skill files in git (e.g., ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md) to build a permanent, cumulative knowledge base across projects. Skills should be continuously refined and used to capture learnings. For complex tasks, using ultracode for dynamic workflows is recommended despite cost. Using git documentation as handoff between agents ensures task continuity without relying solely on context. Finally, he suggests treating Claude Code like a horse with its own path-finding abilities—setting goals and boundaries rather than micromanaging—viewing its autonomy as a feature, not a bug.

Author: Wang Jianshuo

Simply record my experience with Claude Code up to this point. This is purely personal exploration and may not be suitable for everyone.

1. Focus on mastering one tool intensely. I use Claude Code. I don't necessarily think it's better than Codex, but the ROI of comparing tools may not be high, even though being able to articulate the differences eloquently gives a false sense of accomplishment.

2. Remember the most important shortcuts. Control+G to open the editor, helpful for writing longer content; shortcuts like Control+A, Control+E, Control+U which are very practical for quickly moving the cursor in the command line. Although not new to the AI era, they are as important as Control+C and Control+V when in use.

3. Use voice input. HoldSpeak is very helpful.

4. For a project, start by writing PROJECT.md, using a structured method to jot down all thoughts at once.

5. Claude agents are the default way to start.

6. Claude Code, github.com, and cloudflare.com are a perfect match. Hand over the build process, release process, and all domain-related operations to the infrastructure.

7. Separate what is written by humans and by machines. Manually maintain the core CLAUDE.md; don't read the .md files or code written by Claude Code. Let machines handle machine things, humans handle human things. Understand AI-written content by asking the AI, don't look at the source code.

8. Drag and drop files into the Claude Code window—audio, video, documents, screenshots—if you can't explain it clearly, use Command+Shift+5 to take a screenshot and drag it over, it's the fastest.

9. Reconstruct the memory system. Center it around ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md, categorically referencing multiple memory files. Require not using the project's memory, and keep all memory files in git, synchronized to github (private). This way, your memory becomes permanent and cumulative, not scattered across each project.

10. Write Skills, and at the end of each work session, ask Claude to "precipitate what was learned into Skills"—it can do this automatically.

11. Whenever possible, use ultracode to trigger dynamic workflows for complex tasks. Although expensive and slow, the results are still guaranteed.

12. Accumulate skills and refactor skills along the way. Skills need to be kept in git.

13. Use git documents as the output of the previous task and the input for the next task. Let agents have clear handover documents, not relying on context for transitions.

14. Treat Claude Code as a horse (or a person), not as a car. A car turns under your command; a horse has its own ideas, we just need to set goals and boundaries. Its autonomous pathfinding feature is a characteristic, not a bug.

Does anyone have anything to add?

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the author, what is the most critical shortcut to remember when using Claude Code?

AThe author considers the Control+G shortcut (to open the editor for writing longer content) and the Control+A, Control+E, Control+U shortcuts (for quickly moving the cursor in the command line) to be the most important, comparable to Control+C and Control+V.

QWhat does the author suggest is the best practice for handling content written by AI versus content written by humans?

AThe author advises to clearly separate human-written and machine-written content. Manually maintain the core CLAUDE.md file and do not read the .md files or code written by Claude Code. To understand AI-generated content, ask the AI directly instead of reading its source code.

QHow does the author recommend managing one's permanent and accumulative memory system with Claude Code?

AThe author recommends refactoring the memory system by centering it around ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md, which categorically references multiple memory files. One should disable project-specific memory, store all memory files in a git repository, and sync them to a private GitHub repository to ensure memory is permanent, accumulative, and not scattered across projects.

QWhat is the author's analogy for how to treat Claude Code, and what characteristic does this highlight?

AThe author suggests treating Claude Code like a horse (or a person) rather than a car. A car turns under direct command, but a horse has its own ideas; you only need to set the goal and boundaries. This highlights its autonomous pathfinding feature as a characteristic, not a bug.

QWhat infrastructure services does the author mention as a perfect match for use with Claude Code?

AThe author states that Claude Code, github.com, and cloudflare.com are a perfect combination. They recommend handing over the build process, release process, and all domain-related operations to this infrastructure.

Letture associate

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit23 min fa

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit23 min fa

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit32 min fa

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit32 min fa

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit33 min fa

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit33 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片