For the First Time, the U.S. Government Lifts Ban on Crypto Perpetual Contracts: What Does It Mean for the Market?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-30

Introduzione

On May 29, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued guidance permitting 7*24 trading and clearing for crypto asset derivatives, effectively opening the U.S. market to crypto perpetual contracts for the first time. This move allows U.S. citizens and certain platforms to trade these instruments around the clock. Key beneficiaries include Kalshi, which received approval to list a Bitcoin perpetual contract; Coinbase, now the first CFTC-regulated Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) for U.S. clients; and CME, which will transition its Bitcoin futures and options to 7*24 trading. The CFTC emphasized that this is a tailored approach for crypto assets, requiring platforms to maintain compliance and risk assessments, while noting traditional commodities like agriculture may not be suitable for such hours. Industry leaders like Michael Saylor and Brian Armstrong praised the decision for bringing a major segment of the global crypto market to U.S. users. However, consumer advocacy group Better Markets criticized the CFTC, alleging it overlooked investor risks and acted in the industry's interest rather than the public's. Following the guidance, Kraken announced plans to launch CFTC-regulated perpetual futures in the U.S., signaling a potential surge in derivatives trading activity.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010 )

On May 29, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued guidance on 7*24 trading supervision, emphasizing that, due to their digital infrastructure and global continuous trading features, derivatives related to crypto assets are more suitable for round-the-clock trading and clearing.

This means that the United States, previously considered a "no-go zone for crypto perpetual contracts," has opened its doors for the first time. It adds more fuel to the United States becoming a "crypto hub."

Numerous crypto trading platforms and traditional exchanges have responded promptly, launching corresponding trading gateways.

The CFTC's Biggest Gift to the Crypto Market: Opening the 7*24 Perpetual Market

According to incomplete statistics, in 2025, the trading volume of crypto derivatives perpetual contracts ranged between 60 trillion and 85 trillion US dollars, with the highest single-day trading volume reaching 750 billion US dollars; accounting for approximately 75% to 80% of total crypto trading volume.(Odaily Planet Daily Note:Kalshi postedstating the total trading volume for this market in 2025 exceeded 90 trillion US dollars)

However, for U.S. crypto platforms, regulations have never provided clear rules for this huge cake.

Now, the U.S. CFTC has officially opened this market, which originally had almost 0% share, to U.S. citizens and domestic crypto platforms as well as certain CEM exchanges. Simultaneously, U.S. institutions and individual users can now trade crypto perpetual contracts 7*24 seamlessly, eliminating the previous "time difference."

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig called this a historic step "to bring the world's most active crypto derivatives into the U.S. regulatory framework." The regulatory move quickly triggered action from leading crypto platforms.

Direct Beneficiaries of the New Policy: Kalshi, Coinbase, CME

On the same day, the U.S. CFTC issued a product certification order to the designated contract market KalshiEX, LLC, approving the listing of BTCPERP, a perpetual contract referencing the Bitcoin spot price, as a futures product for trading. The contract was submitted for approval under CFTC Regulation 40.3 on May 29, 2026. Additionally, Kalshi plans to launch over a dozen other crypto perpetual contracts subsequently.

Furthermore, Coinbase announced it has become the first and currently the only CFTC-regulated Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) in the U.S., providing U.S. clients with access to global crypto derivatives markets, including crypto perpetual contracts and options(connecting to platforms like Deribit, whose Bitcoin options open interest exceeds $31 billion); simultaneously, Coinbase also received approval to allow using client crypto assets/stablecoins as margin (subject to rehypothecation conditions).

Finally, as a traditional exchange, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) is also a direct beneficiary of this policy change. Bitcoin futures and options on its Globex platform transitioned to 7*24 trading starting this Friday, ending the previous fixed weekend closure from Friday to Sunday, allowing institutional clients to hedge spot volatility seamlessly.

However, this does not mean trading volume will suddenly surge – although the "CME gap" formed due to weekend closures disappears, market liquidity remains concentrated mainly in ETF options and offshore perpetual contracts; the open interest scale of IBIT options is significantly higher than the CME crypto options market. Currently, large traders' short positions continue to decline, reducing short-term selling pressure, but clear long-term positioning trends have not yet formed.

The Cautious Stance Behind the CFTC Guidance: Commodity Differentiation and Strengthening Authority

Yesterday, alongside issuing a "No-Action Letter" to Coinbase, the relevant CFTC department specifically emphasized two things:

  1. Traditional commodity derivatives like agricultural products, due to their regional nature and trading structure, may not be suitable for fully 7*24 round-the-clock operation;
  2. Regulated trading platforms, swap execution facilities, derivatives clearing organizations, and futures commission merchants must comply with the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and relevant regulatory rules when expanding round-the-clock trading, and proactively assess risk management and operational arrangements.

In other words, 7*24 perpetual trading for commodities like agricultural products is currently not permitted; and any institution wishing to offer 7*24 trading for derivatives must communicate with CFTC staff in advance, submit detailed plans and risk analyses, with the CFTC reviewing compliance on a case-by-case basis.

Thus, it can be seen that the CFTC's move is more like a "special case treatment" for crypto assets, opening a gateway for more crypto platforms to launch derivatives sections and further strengthening its regulatory authority over crypto asset derivatives.

Industry Insider Comments: Overwhelming Praise and Support

The CFTC's regulatory guidance represents the true localization of round-the-clock trading for crypto derivatives in the U.S. market. Liquidity from many domestic users previously excluded from the U.S. market is expected to flow back rapidly, further increasing participation from domestic institutions, capital efficiency, and to some extent reducing risk management costs (rollover costs, weekend time gaps).

Strategy founder Michael Saylor posted, stating the CFTC guidance advances Bitcoin capital markets, including round-the-clock trading, BTC collateral, perpetual futures, options, and regulated access. This will benefit BTC holders, support MSTR's development, and support STRC as Bitcoin-backed digital credit development.

Coinbase CEO Brian Amstrong cheered: "U.S. users have been excluded from this 80% segment of the global crypto market (including perpetual futures and options). But not anymore!"

Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated, "This marks Kalshi's evolution from a prediction market leader to a next-generation derivatives exchange. U.S.-based, secure, and regulated perpetual contracts will improve capital allocation and risk management for countless U.S. businesses."

Such statements from beneficiaries are understandable. Some outsiders interpret it as "opening Pandora's box of speculation."

U.S. Public Interest Third-Party Organization: CFTC Ignores Public Interest and Investor Protection

Better Markets, a third-party consumer protection organization established after the 2008 financial crisis, officially stated, "Retail investors are unlikely to fully understand the risks posed by perpetual futures. We urged the CFTC last year to require enhanced disclosures that are easier for retail investors to understand. Unfortunately, the CFTC not only failed to require such enhanced disclosures but also seemed to completely ignore the risks of the products it approved."

"The CFTC's action lacks the decorum expected of a regulator. However, considering Coinbase and Kalshi serve as advisory bodies on two of the CFTC's advisory committees, this is not surprising. It's clear the CFTC's work is not for the public interest or protecting investors, but for the very industries it is supposed to regulate."

The wording directly implies the U.S. CFTC might have interests involved or some level of internal cooperation with Coinbase and Kalshi.

The U.S. Market to Enter a Period of Derivatives Trading Explosion

Apart from the direct beneficiaries mentioned above, U.S. crypto exchange Kraken also stated it plans to launch the first CFTC-regulated perpetual futures product for the U.S. market within the next 30 days. Currently, perpetual futures on Kraken Pro are provided by NinjaTrader Clearing, LLC (operating as Kraken Derivatives US), a CFTC-registered Futures Commission Merchant; related spot margin and perpetual futures products will be offered on Bitnomial Exchange(Odaily Planet Daily Note: the latter is a CFTC-regulated exchange recently acquired by Kraken's parent company Payward).

Setting aside polarized opinions, the gate to the multi-trillion-dollar perpetual derivatives market is slowly opening for U.S. users.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main implication of the CFTC's new guidance for crypto derivatives in the United States?

AThe main implication is the formal opening of the U.S. market for 24/7 trading of crypto perpetual contracts, which were previously largely inaccessible to U.S. citizens and regulated platforms. This allows U.S. individuals and institutions to trade crypto derivatives like perpetual swaps around the clock, eliminating previous time gaps like the "CME gap."

QWhich specific companies are mentioned as direct beneficiaries of the CFTC's new policy?

AThe article names three direct beneficiaries: Kalshi (specifically KalshiEX, LLC), Coinbase, and CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange). Kalshi received approval to list a Bitcoin perpetual contract, Coinbase became the first CFTC-regulated FCM to offer U.S. clients access to global crypto derivatives, and CME will transition its Bitcoin futures and options to 24/7 trading on its Globex platform.

QAccording to the CFTC's statement, why are crypto assets deemed more suitable for 24/7 trading compared to traditional commodities like agricultural products?

AAccording to the CFTC, crypto assets are more suitable for 24/7 trading and clearing due to their digital infrastructure and global, continuous trading nature. In contrast, traditional commodity derivatives like agricultural products may not be suitable for fully continuous operation because of their regional characteristics and specific trading structures.

QWhat criticism does the consumer protection group Better Markets raise against the CFTC's decision?

ABetter Markets criticizes the CFTC for allegedly ignoring public interest and investor protection. They argue that retail investors are unlikely to fully understand the risks of perpetual futures, and they accuse the CFTC of failing to require enhanced, easily understandable disclosures. They also suggest potential undue industry influence, pointing out that Coinbase and Kalshi serve on CFTC advisory committees.

QWhat significant change is Kraken planning following the CFTC's new regulatory stance?

AFollowing the CFTC's guidance, Kraken announced plans to launch its first CFTC-regulated perpetual futures product for the U.S. market within the next 30 days. This offering will be facilitated through its partnership with the CFTC-registered futures commission merchant NinjaTrader Clearing, LLC (operating as Kraken Derivatives US) and the recently acquired, CFTC-regulated Bitnomial Exchange.

Letture associate

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit25 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit25 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit44 min fa

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit44 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit53 min fa

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit53 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片