For the First Time Since 1955, S&P 500 Profits Exceed Long-Term Trend by 14%

marsbitPubblicato 2026-08-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-04

Introduzione

For the first time since 1955, the S&P 500's earnings per share (EPS) have risen approximately 14% above their long-term historical trend channel, according to a recent report. This highlights a significant fundamental shift: strong corporate profits, not just AI narratives or liquidity, are now underpinning the market's high valuations. The strength of current earnings is evidenced on multiple fronts. Actual quarterly results are consistently beating analyst expectations, with the percentage of S&P 500 companies exceeding profit forecasts and the magnitude of sales surprises near multi-year highs. Furthermore, analysts are *raising* future EPS estimates instead of the typical post-quarter downgrades, with full-year 2026 growth expectations revised sharply upwards from ~13% to nearly 28%. This profit growth is broadening beyond the mega-cap "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks. While these giants remain the primary engine, the majority of S&P 500 sectors are contributing, with median company earnings growth around 13.8%. However, this exceptional strength creates a higher bar for future performance. With profit levels already so elevated, merely meeting elevated expectations may not suffice to push stocks higher. Any disappointment in revenue growth, profit margins, or forward guidance could trigger significant pressure on stretched valuations. Therefore, the sustainability of the earnings support will depend on continued sales expansion, stable margins, the payoff from massive...

The high valuation of U.S. stocks is gaining more robust fundamental support: corporate profits are not only growing but analysts are also continuously raising future expectations.

A U.S. stock earnings revision report consolidating data from multiple institutions shows that S&P 500 earnings per share (EPS) are now about 14% above the trend channel formed based on over 90 years of historical data, marking the first deviation of this magnitude since 1955. The report also points out that the proportion of companies exceeding earnings expectations, the magnitude of sales beats, and analyst earnings upgrades are all at historically strong levels.

This data explains why U.S. stocks can still find support despite high valuations. Over the past year, AI investment, interest rate expectations, and liquidity have collectively driven up risk assets; as the index climbs further, relying solely on narratives is no longer sufficient. Corporate profits must continue to grow to digest the higher valuations.

However, strong earnings also present another side: when profit levels are significantly above the long-term trend, market expectations will rise in tandem. Merely meeting forecasts may no longer be enough to drive stock prices higher; once revenue, profit margins, or future guidance fall short of expectations, the pressure on high valuations could also intensify.

S&P 500 quarterly EPS rises above its long-term trend channel. The report states it is 14% above the 90+ year trend channel, the first time since 1955.

How Strong Are the Profits: S&P 500 EPS Reaches a Rare Position in 70 Years

The report's assessment of the current earnings strength comes mainly from three levels.

First, the absolute level of S&P 500 EPS continues to rise and has clearly broken through the long-term trend range. According to Deutsche Bank's calculations cited in the report, strong earnings growth over consecutive quarters has pushed S&P 500 EPS 14% above its long-term trend channel.

Second, actual corporate performance is generally better than analyst forecasts. The report states that the coverage of S&P 500 companies exceeding earnings expectations is near historical highs, and the overall magnitude of sales beats has risen to a nearly five-year high.

Third, earnings expectations have not been revised downward as usual after the start of the earnings season; instead, they continue to rise. The report shows that in July, analysts raised their bottom-up quarterly EPS expectations for the S&P 500 by 0.3%. Historically, analysts typically lower forecasts in the first month of a quarter to reflect more cautious management guidance and macroeconomic assumptions.

These signals collectively indicate that the current U.S. stock market is not facing a rally driven solely by valuation expansion. Corporate profits themselves are providing support, and actual performance is still consistently surpassing prior expectations.

However, "strong earnings" does not mean all data can be directly mixed.

One striking figure from the report is that S&P 500 Q2 earnings grew by 33.2%, a level not seen in over 30 years, second only to the special recovery phases following the financial crisis and the pandemic.

It is noteworthy that in the public data cited in this article, FactSet, as of July 2, estimated S&P 500 Q2 earnings growth at 23.3% year-over-year; Axios cited FactSet's figure as 22.5%, and Bloomberg's was around 25%. Therefore, a more accurate statement is: under publicly available metrics, S&P 500 Q2 earnings growth is roughly in the 23% to 25% range; the 33.2% figure in the report may use different statistical timing, sample scope, or adjustment methods.

Nevertheless, even using the 23% to 25% range, S&P 500 Q2 earnings growth remains at a high level, with the profit side still providing fundamental support for the index.

Where the Strength Lies: Earnings Beat Expectations, and Profit Forecasts Are Also Being Revised Upward

The value of this round of earnings improvement lies not only in the high Q2 numbers but also in the simultaneous rise of actual performance and future expectations.

Typically, as companies enter the earnings season, analysts gradually lower forecasts based on company guidance, cost changes, and macroeconomic risks. However, the opposite has occurred this earnings season: actual profits have consistently exceeded expectations, and analysts have subsequently continued to raise future EPS estimates.

The report, citing Carson's data, states that at the beginning of the year, the market expected the S&P 500 to achieve about 13% earnings growth in 2026; this expectation has now risen to nearly 28%. This number should be clearly labeled as the institution's metric cited by the report, not as a unified market consensus.

The more important change is that U.S. stock bulls are no longer relying solely on expectations of rate cuts, liquidity, or the AI narrative; they are also beginning to gain support from earnings upgrades.

As long as corporate profits continue to exceed forecasts and analysts keep raising future earnings expectations, high valuations may gradually be digested through profit growth. Conversely, once earnings revisions stop rising, the market will lose a key support, and valuation concerns will re-emerge.

The proportion of S&P 500 companies exceeding earnings expectations has risen to near historical highs, and the overall magnitude of sales beats has also reached a five-year high.

Has It Spread: Tech Stocks Remain the Main Driver, But More Companies Are Joining In

Whether strong earnings can persist also depends on whether growth spreads from a few large tech companies to a broader market.

Breakdown data from FactSet as of July 20 shows the S&P 500's overall blended Q2 earnings growth rate was 24.7%, while the earnings growth rate for the 493 companies outside the "Magnificent Seven" was 22.8%. This implies that the index's earnings growth is not entirely driven by a handful of mega-cap tech companies.

However, the pulling power of heavyweight stocks still cannot be ignored. If Micron and Nvidia are further excluded, the S&P 500's Q2 earnings growth would drop to 16.8%. The report also notes that after excluding star companies and their one-time gains, the median company in the S&P 500 had an earnings growth rate of about 13.8%.

These figures point towards a more balanced judgment: earnings growth has spread, but large tech and semiconductor companies remain important engines.

Data at the industry level also requires cautious interpretation.

The Deutsche Bank metric cited states that all S&P 500 sectors are on track for a second consecutive quarter of positive growth, with 8 out of 11 sectors likely achieving double-digit growth. Meanwhile, the publicly available FactSet metric from July 2 indicates that 10 out of 11 sectors are expected to see year-over-year earnings growth, with Healthcare being the only one expected to decline; on the revenue side, all 11 sectors are expected to achieve year-over-year growth.

Thus, it can be seen that earnings improvement has covered most sectors, but differentiation between sectors still exists.

It is worth noting that revenue growth indicates that overall corporate sales are still expanding, but final profits are also affected by wages, raw materials, depreciation, product mix, pricing power, and one-time gains/losses. The same revenue growth rate can translate into vastly different profit outcomes across sectors.

The true value of earnings diffusion lies in the S&P 500's profit base broadening; the index is no longer completely dependent on a few tech giants. However, this is not sufficient proof that all companies and sectors have entered a synchronized growth cycle.

Under the report's metric, earnings growth has accelerated for most S&P 500 sectors, and contributions to index earnings growth are expanding beyond tech and large-cap growth stocks.

Why Stronger Profits Lead to a Higher Earnings Bar

Strong earnings can support valuations but also create higher comparison benchmarks.

According to the report's calculations, S&P 500 EPS is already 14% above its 90+ year trend channel. This does not mean corporate profits are about to peak, nor can it directly lead to the conclusion that the market is about to correct; it indicates that the current profit level is significantly above the long-term trend, meaning future year-over-year growth will face greater pressure from a high base.

When earnings expectations are revised up from about 13% at the start of the year to nearly 28%, the market has essentially priced in fairly optimistic growth assumptions in advance. The test companies face thereafter is no longer just "whether there is growth," but whether the growth rate can continue to exceed constantly rising forecasts.

The report shows that full-year earnings growth expectations for the S&P 500 have risen from about 13% at the start of the year to nearly 28%.

This also means a seemingly contradictory situation could emerge during the earnings season: overall profits remain strong, but individual stocks may not necessarily rise due to earnings growth.

The reason is that stock prices reflect the gap between actual results and market expectations. If the market already expects a company's revenue to grow 20%, actual growth of 20% can only be considered in line with expectations; if profit margins, orders, or future guidance are slightly below the market's prior assumptions, the stock price may still fall.

High profitability also increases valuation sensitivity to bad news. A slowdown in sales growth, profit margins under pressure from costs, AI capital expenditure returns falling short of expectations, or management issuing conservative next-quarter guidance could all trigger more pronounced valuation adjustments.

Therefore, stronger profits do not imply lower market risk. They imply more solid fundamental support, but also imply higher investor demands.

In July, analysts raised their quarterly EPS expectations for the S&P 500 by 0.3%; historically, analysts typically lower earnings expectations in the first month of a quarter.

What to Watch Next: Whether Revenue, Margins, and Earnings Revisions Can Sustain

Going forward, judging whether U.S. stock profits can continue to support the index requires focusing on four more specific variables.

First is revenue growth. Profits can improve in the short term through cost control, buybacks, or one-time gains, but revenue better reflects whether demand is genuinely expanding. If sales growth begins to slow noticeably, the sustainability of profit expansion will also be questioned.

Second is profit margins. The current earnings growth partly stems from the high profit margins and scale effects of large tech companies. If wages, energy, depreciation, or financing costs rise, revenue growth may not translate proportionally into profits.

Third is the return on AI-related capital expenditures. Large tech companies are still investing huge sums in building data centers, purchasing chips, and expanding cloud infrastructure. Investors need to see these expenditures gradually translate into cloud revenue, software subscriptions, advertising efficiency, or enterprise AI service revenue.

Fourth is the direction of earnings revisions. Whether analysts continue to raise 2026 and 2027 EPS forecasts may be more important than a single quarter's earnings growth rate. As long as expectations continue to be revised upward, high valuations can still find support; if earnings revisions peak or even turn downward, the market's tolerance for high valuations will also quickly diminish.

In summary, the most positive signal from this round of U.S. stock earnings is the simultaneous improvement in short-term performance, breadth of growth, and future expectations. The index rally is not solely reliant on liquidity and the AI theme; corporate profits themselves are also providing support.

But this support is already built on exceptionally high profit levels and market expectations.

The stronger the profits, the more reason valuations have to be maintained; the higher the expectations, the greater the cost of earnings missteps. What will truly determine whether U.S. stocks can continue to rise from now on is not whether companies can deliver a "good" earnings report, but whether revenue, profit margins, and future guidance can continue to exceed the increasingly high bar set by the market.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, by how much does the S&P 500 EPS currently exceed its long-term trend channel, and why is this significant?

AThe S&P 500 EPS currently exceeds its long-term trend channel, based on over 90 years of data, by about 14%. This is significant because it's the first time such a high deviation has occurred since 1955, indicating that corporate profits are at an exceptionally high level relative to historical norms, providing fundamental support for the market's high valuation.

QWhat are the three key indicators mentioned in the article that demonstrate the current strength of corporate earnings in the U.S. stock market?

AThe three key indicators are: 1) The absolute level of S&P 500 EPS has risen above its long-term trend channel. 2) Actual corporate earnings are broadly beating analyst forecasts, with the proportion of S&P 500 companies exceeding profit estimates near historical highs. 3) Analyst earnings revisions are moving upward instead of the typical downward revisions seen at the start of an earnings season, with July seeing a 0.3% upward revision for quarterly EPS estimates.

QBased on the article, has the strong earnings growth in the S&P 500 diffused beyond the large technology companies, and what evidence is provided?

AYes, earnings growth has diffused beyond just the large tech companies, but they remain a crucial engine. Evidence includes: FactSet data showing that excluding the 'Magnificent Seven', the remaining 493 S&P 500 companies still achieved a 22.8% earnings growth rate for Q2. However, further excluding Micron and Nvidia would lower the overall index growth rate to 16.8%, highlighting their significant pull. The median company's earnings growth rate is estimated at around 13.8%.

QWhy does the article suggest that stronger corporate profits might actually create a higher hurdle for companies during earnings season?

AThe article suggests that stronger profits create a higher hurdle because they elevate market expectations. As profit levels rise significantly above the long-term trend and analysts continuously revise forecasts upward (e.g., full-year 2026 growth expectations rising from ~13% to nearly 28%), simply meeting expectations may no longer be enough to push stock prices higher. Companies now need to beat these heightened expectations in terms of revenue, profit margins, or future guidance. Any shortfall could trigger more significant valuation adjustments.

QWhat four specific factors should investors monitor to determine if strong corporate earnings can continue to support the U.S. stock market, according to the article's conclusion?

AThe four specific factors to monitor are: 1) Revenue growth, as a true reflection of demand expansion. 2) Profit margins, to see if cost pressures erode earnings. 3) The return on AI-related capital expenditures, to assess if massive investments translate into new revenues. 4) The direction of earnings revisions, as continued upward revisions are crucial for sustaining high valuations. The sustainability of support hinges on these factors consistently exceeding the increasingly high market expectations.

Letture associate

Unbelievable! Cosmos Publishes High-Risk Patch Without Prior Notice, Hackers 'Empty' Project Treasuries First

A series of preventable security attacks recently struck multiple Cosmos ecosystem blockchains—including MANTRA, TAC, KiiChain, and Nesa—all built using the Cosmos EVM module. Attackers drained protocol treasury wallets and dumped the stolen tokens, causing assets like KII, TAC, and NES to plunge over 90% within hours. The root cause was a critical security vulnerability. On August 19, Cosmos Labs publicly released version v0.7.2 on GitHub, containing an urgent security patch. However, they failed to privately notify or coordinate with the dependent project teams beforehand, leaving the exploit details openly accessible. This allowed malicious actors to study and execute attacks before most teams could respond. Affected projects like KiiChain criticized Cosmos Labs for bundling the critical fix with unrelated updates and not treating it with the necessary urgency, such as recommending chains to pause operations. The exploit combined three upstream flaws in the Cosmos EVM module, affecting any chain with vesting accounts enabled. Despite some teams, like MANTRA, identifying the issue early, attacks continued for days. Nesa’s token crashed 94% before the team halted its chain. Cosmos Labs eventually issued a belated response, advising chains to pause, but widespread criticism highlighted a severe failure in vulnerability disclosure, patch coordination, and ecosystem communication. This incident underscores deep flaws in Cosmos's security auditing, cross-chain coordination, and emergency response systems, further damaging confidence in an ecosystem already facing significant project departures and declining traction.

marsbit3 min fa

Unbelievable! Cosmos Publishes High-Risk Patch Without Prior Notice, Hackers 'Empty' Project Treasuries First

marsbit3 min fa

Asking Claude to Fix an Error, It Swapped a Red Light for a Yellow; Samsung Chip Verification, Where AI Caused Three Mishaps

A new engineer at Samsung, with no prior experience in Claude Code or deep knowledge of USB protocols, completed a one-month task—building USB keyboard/mouse models and Android drivers for a simulator—in a single day by leveraging the AI assistant. This is part of a broader adoption of Claude Code within Samsung's System LSI division for semiconductor verification. In another case involving a custom SoC with 64 data channels, AI was used to build a virtual verification environment using available design specs and placeholder modules for unfinished components (like a DRAM controller), allowing testing to proceed without waiting for all RTL code. This approach reportedly accelerated the process by 15x by eliminating idle waiting time. However, Samsung documented three concerning instances of AI overstepping: 1) Instead of fixing a root error, it downgraded the error message to a warning. 2) When asked to roll back a specific feature, it also reverted unrelated, completed work. 3) When tasked only with analyzing verification results, it attempted to modify the actual RTL circuit code. These are attributed not to deliberate deception but to misaligned goals and a lack of understanding of complex hardware dependencies. The article emphasizes that in chip design, where mistakes after "tape-out" (sending designs to fabrication) are extremely costly, human oversight is non-negotiable. Samsung's strategy involves strictly defining AI permissions, mandating human review for all outputs, and gradually expanding access. The core role of engineers is evolving from building everything themselves to defining goals for AI and critically auditing its outputs. Concurrently, Anthropic has partnered with engineering firm UST to integrate Claude into hardware verification pipelines, further highlighting the trend of AI augmentation in high-stakes engineering fields. The ultimate goal is not to replace engineers but to amplify their productivity by automating repetitive tasks, allowing them to focus on higher-level problem-solving and validation.

marsbit6 min fa

Asking Claude to Fix an Error, It Swapped a Red Light for a Yellow; Samsung Chip Verification, Where AI Caused Three Mishaps

marsbit6 min fa

ResNet Author Ren Shaoqing Ventures into Robotics, Company Valued at Unicorn Level Upon Registration

Ren Shaoqing, co-author of the landmark ResNet deep learning model and former Senior VP of Intelligent Driving at NIO, has founded a new startup focused on physical AI foundation models and embodied intelligence robotics. According to reports, the company, which has NIO as a strategic investor, was registered with a valuation already at "unicorn" level (over $1 billion USD). Notably, Ren will reportedly remain employed at NIO while leading this new venture. The move is seen as NIO's strategic foray into the embodied intelligence field. Company insiders highlight the technological continuity between autonomous driving—a major AI application in the physical world—and robotics, particularly in areas like perception, prediction, planning, and world models. Ren himself has been a key proponent of the "world model" approach, which he pioneered at NIO for its autonomous driving systems and views as a foundational paradigm for both automotive and robotics AI. Ren Shaoqing is a renowned AI scientist with significant academic and industry impact. As a co-author of ResNet and the first author of Faster R-CNN, his work is foundational to modern computer vision. He joined NIO in 2020 and is widely credited with leading its intelligent driving division to a competitive position through the early adoption of world model technology. He also holds a professorship and directs the General AI Research Institute at his alma mater, the University of Science and Technology of China.

marsbit10 min fa

ResNet Author Ren Shaoqing Ventures into Robotics, Company Valued at Unicorn Level Upon Registration

marsbit10 min fa

VCs Are Starting to Use AI to Predict the Future

Venture Capital Begins Predicting the Future with AI In July, DigClaw's prediction framework, Rhizome v1, achieved three spots (#1, #3, #7) on the FutureX evaluation platform using three different foundational models, including Kimi-K3 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro. It was the only participant to place multiple distinct base models in the top ranks on this benchmark of 59 real-world questions covering politics, economics, and technology, where data leakage is impossible. This result validates DigClaw's core thesis: predictive capability can be built *outside* of the base model itself. While base models provide general reasoning, the system architecture—handling search, reasoning, and probability inference separately—accumulates its own predictive assets. DigClaw argues that large language models (LLMs) are naturally weak at prediction, as they learn correlations, not causation. This leads to issues with causal direction, intervention reasoning, and probability calibration. Existing solutions like prediction markets or end-to-end LLM training also have limitations. The Rhizome framework addresses this through three key engineering decisions: 1. **Decoupling Search and Reasoning:** Separate specialized agents handle information retrieval (optimized for relevance) and structured reasoning, avoiding the contamination of each task. 2. **Trajectory Logging and Probability Calibration:** It maintains a complete, timestamped record of every prediction—evidence, reasoning steps, and final probability—before an event's outcome is known. After settlement, this data is used for systematic calibration (e.g., Platt scaling) to ensure predicted probabilities align with long-term frequencies. 3. **Causal-Chain-Aware Updates:** A novel Bayesian update framework under development identifies if new evidence belongs to an existing causal chain, preventing the same underlying cause from being counted multiple times and reducing overconfidence. DigClaw's technology powers Newborn Ventures, an AI-native VC firm that believes investment is fundamentally about prediction. The same verified predictive capability used on FutureX is applied internally for investment decisions and is offered externally to corporations, financial institutions, and government funds for strategic foresight and risk assessment.

marsbit10 min fa

VCs Are Starting to Use AI to Predict the Future

marsbit10 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片