Federal Reserve quietly reverses anti-crypto stance with new policy

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-12-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-17

Introduzione

The Federal Reserve has reversed its restrictive 2023 policy on "novel activities" and replaced it with a new framework that creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation. Announced on 17 December, the move adopts a "same activity, same risks, same regulation" philosophy, allowing banks to pursue crypto-related services like custody, tokenization, and stablecoin integration if they demonstrate strong risk management. The policy shift enables both insured and uninsured state member banks to apply for innovative activities, benefiting crypto-focused institutions. This marks a significant regulatory pivot from discouraging crypto engagement to encouraging responsible innovation under supervision, aligning with broader U.S. efforts to integrate blockchain into mainstream finance.

The Federal Reserve has withdrawn its restrictive 2023 policy on “novel activities” and replaced it with a new framework.

The new policy creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation, marking one of the most significant regulatory pivots in years.

The move, announced on 17 December, reverses the Fed’s prior stance, which had limited state member banks to only those activities explicitly allowed for national banks.

The 2023 policy had served as a de facto barrier to crypto-related services, especially custody, tokenization, and stablecoin integrations. Its withdrawal signals a shift toward enabling responsible digital-asset activity within the U.S. banking system.

Fed removes 2023 restrictions and adopts innovation-friendly standard

Under the new policy statement, the Federal Reserve adopts a “same activity, same risks, same regulation” philosophy — a framework that allows banks to pursue new technologies as long as they demonstrate strong risk management and comply with supervisory expectations.

Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman described the new guidance as an effort to modernize the banking sector while maintaining safety and soundness.

“New technologies offer efficiencies to banks and improved products and services to bank customers,” Bowman said.

“By creating a pathway for responsible, innovative products and services, the Board is helping ensure that the banking sector remains safe and sound while also modern, efficient, and effective.”

The withdrawal of the 2023 guidance also removes the supplementary crypto-specific interpretations that strongly discouraged engagement with digital assets.

That change alone opens the door for supervised banks to revisit cryptocurrency custody, tokenization, blockchain settlement tools, and stablecoin integrations.

Clearer path for both insured and uninsured banks — including crypto-focused institutions

One of the most notable changes is that both insured and uninsured state member banks can now apply to conduct innovative activities, including those not yet permissible for national banks.

This has major implications for Wyoming SPDI-style institutions and trust banks focusing on digital assets.

The Fed states that uninsured banks may engage in a broader range of activities if they demonstrate adequate liquidity, loss-absorbing capacity, and credible resolution mechanisms.

The move follows the recent pilot program by the CFTC, and the OCC’s approval of trust charters for some crypto companies.

What this means for crypto adoption

This policy update does not give banks carte blanche to launch crypto products — but it finally replaces a restrictive framework with a risk-based approval system that encourages experimentation.

Banks seeking to custody crypto, settle tokenized assets, integrate stablecoins, or deploy blockchain rails now have:

  • A formal application path
  • Clarity on supervisory expectations
  • A regulatory environment that no longer assumes such activities are inherently unsafe

It’s a structural shift in tone — from “don’t engage with crypto” to “engage responsibly under supervision.”


Final Thoughts

  • The Federal Reserve’s withdrawal of its 2023 policy marks its clearest pro-innovation stance in years, opening the door for bank-led crypto adoption.
  • With the CFTC and OCC already advancing digital-asset frameworks, U.S. banking regulators are converging on a strategy that integrates blockchain into mainstream finance.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat did the Federal Reserve do with its 2023 policy on 'novel activities'?

AThe Federal Reserve withdrew its restrictive 2023 policy and replaced it with a new framework that creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation.

QWhat is the core regulatory philosophy adopted in the new Federal Reserve policy?

AThe new policy adopts a 'same activity, same risks, same regulation' philosophy, allowing banks to pursue new technologies if they demonstrate strong risk management and comply with supervisory expectations.

QAccording to the article, what specific crypto-related services are now more accessible to banks under the new policy?

AThe new framework opens the door for supervised banks to revisit cryptocurrency custody, tokenization, blockchain settlement tools, and stablecoin integrations.

QHow does the new policy affect both insured and uninsured state member banks?

ABoth insured and uninsured state member banks can now apply to conduct innovative activities, including those not yet permissible for national banks, provided they demonstrate adequate risk management.

QWhat broader regulatory trend does this Federal Reserve move represent alongside actions from the CFTC and OCC?

AThis move indicates that U.S. banking regulators are converging on a strategy to integrate blockchain into mainstream finance, following the CFTC's pilot program and the OCC's approval of trust charters for crypto companies.

Letture associate

Anthropic Major Release: "The Founder's Playbook" - All 4 Stages of Entrepreneurship, Completely Reimagined with AI

**Anthropic Releases "The Founder's Playbook," Reimagining the Four Stages of Startups with AI** The logic of entrepreneurship is being fundamentally reshaped by AI. Anthropic's new handbook, "The Founder's Playbook: Building an AI-Native Startup," defines the AI-native startup as a new species: not a traditional company with AI tools, but a venture driven by AI from day one. The founder's role is transforming from a hands-on builder to a conductor or architect, orchestrating AI agents for execution while focusing on high-level judgment and strategy. Anthropic outlines a product matrix of Claude tools for different tasks: Claude Chat for interactive research, Claude Code for generating production-ready code, and Claude Cowork for automating knowledge-intensive workflows. The handbook structures the startup lifecycle into four stages, detailing core goals, pitfalls, and AI applications for each: 1. **Idea Stage**: Focuses on validating a real problem. The core challenge is avoiding confirmation bias. AI practices include using Claude as a "structured devil's advocate" to challenge assumptions and for automated market/competitor research. 2. **MVP Stage**: Aims to gather early signals of Product-Market Fit (PMF). Key risks are technical debt and scope creep due to rapid AI-assisted development. Recommended AI uses include maintaining project memory documents (e.g., CLAUDE.md), using Claude Code for structured coding, and automating user feedback analysis. 3. **Launch Stage**: Centers on establishing scalable growth, operations, and compliance. Challenges include accelerating technical debt and founders becoming bottlenecks. AI should be used to build an "operating system" for launch—automating routine tasks (scheduling, reporting, content) and code audits—freeing founders for critical decisions. 4. **Scale Stage**: Focuses on achieving sustainable business operations. The main challenge is delegating operational control. AI should be leveraged for differentiated marketing, operational optimization, and building competitive moats through data network effects. The handbook concludes that in the AI era, "Can we build it?" is no longer the primary constraint. The advantage shifts back to foundational strengths: **insight, judgment, and a deep understanding of a specific problem and audience.**

marsbit6 h fa

Anthropic Major Release: "The Founder's Playbook" - All 4 Stages of Entrepreneurship, Completely Reimagined with AI

marsbit6 h fa

Eight Departments Launch Severe Crackdown on Cross-Border Securities Firms, How to Interpret This?

China's top financial regulators, including the CSRC and seven other ministries, have launched a sweeping crackdown on unlicensed cross-border securities operations. The core action involves a joint enforcement plan and the issuance of administrative penalties against major offshore internet brokers like Futu and Tiger Brokers for conducting unauthorized securities business in mainland China without a domestic license. The primary legal basis is China's requirement for securities businesses to operate with proper, locally issued licenses. The crackdown aims to eliminate a major regulatory gray area, plugging channels that allowed massive, unmonitored capital outflows which posed risks to financial stability, currency controls, and foreign exchange reserves. It also seeks to protect mainland investors who previously lacked legal recourse when dealing with offshore platforms and to secure sensitive financial data. The immediate impact is severe for the targeted brokers, including a complete ban on new mainland business, forced liquidation of existing mainland client positions over two years, and the confiscation of illegal profits estimated in the billions. Their U.S.-listed shares plummeted in response. Market analysts warn that the forced sell-off of an estimated 250-280 billion RMB in assets, concentrated in U.S. tech stocks, Chinese ADRs, and Hong Kong equities, could create sustained selling pressure on these markets over the next two years, potentially lowering valuations. For mainland investors, legal cross-border investment channels will become extremely constrained. The high asset threshold for the Stock Connect program and the severe shortage of QDII fund quotas—leading to chronic high premiums on popular U.S.-focused ETFs—mean retail access to overseas markets like the U.S. will be sharply limited. Conversely, some of the returning capital may flow into domestic A-share sectors like AI, semiconductors, and advanced manufacturing. However, this could further inflate valuations in these already elevated sectors. In conclusion, regulators frame this move not as closing off cross-border investment, but as a necessary step to enforce compliance, manage systemic risk, and steer investors toward regulated, protected channels like QDII and Stock Connect for the long-term health of the financial system.

链捕手6 h fa

Eight Departments Launch Severe Crackdown on Cross-Border Securities Firms, How to Interpret This?

链捕手6 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片