Fed Officials: The Current Choice Is Between Patience and Interest Rate Hikes; Inflation Is Top Economic Risk, AI Not Impactful Currently

marsbitPubblicato 2026-06-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-06-05

Introduzione

Fed officials sent hawkish signals on inflation and interest rates. Key officials emphasized that the central bank's current choice is between maintaining patience and considering rate hikes to combat stubbornly high inflation, which they identified as the top economic risk. Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid explicitly placed rate hikes on the table, while San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly stated policy is in a good place but the Fed is prepared to move in "either direction," cautioning that forward guidance could be misleading amid high uncertainty. Market pricing now reflects a significant chance of a rate increase this year. Regarding AI, officials noted it is currently neither raising nor lowering inflation and has not yet delivered widespread productivity gains at a macroeconomic level. While AI could become a disinflationary force over a five-to-ten-year horizon, it is not an immediate factor for near-term monetary policy decisions. The next FOMC meeting in June is widely expected to leave rates unchanged. Officials also observed that the labor market appears balanced and is showing signs of stabilizing.

Author: Li Dan

Source: Wall Street News

Federal Reserve officials made concentrated remarks on Thursday, April 4th, Eastern US time. Three regional Fed presidents sent relatively hawkish signals regarding the path of inflation and interest rates. They indicated that the core dilemma currently facing the Fed is choosing between maintaining patience by keeping rates steady or proactively raising interest rates to suppress persistently high inflation. One official explicitly stated that AI is currently neither pushing inflation higher nor lowering it, having limited impact on short-term monetary policy decisions.

Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid bluntly stated that inflation is the top risk facing the US economy and, for the first time publicly, included interest rate hikes in policy discussions, omitting any mention of rate cuts.

San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly noted that monetary policy is currently in a reasonable position, but economic uncertainty is too high, and providing forward guidance could potentially mislead markets. The Fed is prepared to "respond in both directions." Market interest rate futures indicate that investors now perceive the probability of a rate hike within the year as having risen to a relatively high level.

The Fed is scheduled to hold its next monetary policy meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, on June 16-17. This will be the first FOMC meeting chaired by the new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, and the market widely expects the policy rate to be held steady at that time.

Both Daly and Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin, who also spoke on Thursday, have FOMC voting rights next year and in 2027, while Schmid is a voting member in the following year, 2028. Therefore, their statements are receiving significant market attention.

Schmid: Rate Hike Option is on the Table, Considering Whether Inflation is Temporary

Schmid was direct in his remarks at an economic forum in Oklahoma on Thursday, explicitly putting rate hikes on the table as an option.

He said: "The big question now is, do we remain patient? Our inflation numbers may have climbed to around 3.5%, no one likes that number. Is it temporary... or should we take action? Should we say, okay, it's time to raise rates 25 or 50 basis points and see if we can push it down?"

Schmid's comments reflect deepening concern within the Fed about the persistence of inflation. Previously, Fed officials generally believed that inflation driven by tariffs and oil prices would naturally subside over time, but this assessment is now facing challenges. According to Reuters, the Fed's policy rate has been held in the 3.5% to 3.75% range since last December, while inflation has remained above the 2% policy target for over five consecutive years.

Schmid made no mention of the possibility of rate cuts throughout his remarks. This stands in stark contrast to the stance at the beginning of the year when most officials considered rate cuts the baseline scenario. He emphasized that the 2% inflation target facilitates clear communication, and the Fed should not be ambiguous on this issue, "should not let that message become fuzzy."

Daly: Prepared to Respond in Both Directions, Forward Guidance Could Be Misleading

Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech Conference in San Francisco on Thursday, Daly said monetary policy is currently in a good place, but economic uncertainty is too high to provide clear guidance on the direction of interest rates.

She said: "We are prepared to respond in both directions on rates, no matter how the economy evolves. I think providing more forward guidance at this point could ultimately be misleading because we have to wait for the economic picture to evolve."

On inflation, Daly noted that the Fed's preferred inflation gauge rose 3.8% year-over-year in April, the largest increase since 2023. She attributed the main drivers of current inflation to tariffs, as well as rising energy and food prices following the outbreak of the Iran war—persistently rising oil prices have spread to prices of goods like fertilizer and equipment. Regarding the job market, she mentioned the current unemployment rate is 4.3%, with the labor market showing signs of stabilization.

Daly stated that as the economic situation develops, more officials are leaning towards the Fed making it clear that all options, including both rate cuts and hikes, are under consideration. According to federal funds futures contracts, investors currently see a higher likelihood of a rate hike within the year.

Daly: AI Could Lower Inflation in Five to Ten Years, No Widespread Productivity Boost Seen Currently

Addressing the widely discussed impact of AI on the economy, Daly stated that AI is currently neither a factor pushing inflation higher nor has it manifested widespread productivity gains at the macroeconomic data level.

She said, "We have not yet seen a widespread productivity boost," and the return on business investment in AI "remains to be realized," but business enthusiasm for the technology is "pretty strong."

According to reports, Daly believes that within a five-to-ten-year timeframe, AI has the potential to be a force lowering inflation. However, for monetary policy operating on a 12-month horizon, this AI effect is "not a pressing issue."

She also pointed out that currently, generative AI is primarily used to assist workers rather than replace them. Whether AI-driven productivity gains ultimately bring about deflationary effects depends crucially on timing.

Daly expressed optimism about AI, expecting 2027 to be a "litmus test" year for the AI industry.

Barkin: Job Market Balanced, No Signs of Labor Shortage Tension

Speaking after an event in Loudoun County, Virginia, on Thursday, Barkin said the U.S. labor market is currently in a balanced state, with no significant increase in overall labor demand.

He said, "I'm not seeing any change in the job market," noting signs of rising demand in technical occupations and healthcare, but overall, the job market is not tight.

Barkin stated that in conversations with employers, "I'm not hearing the kind of concerns I would call frothy, tight." This assessment aligns with Schmid's view that the overall economy is performing well and with Daly's mention of labor market stabilization, further supporting the Fed's current stance of holding steady and awaiting more data.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are the two main policy options facing the Federal Reserve according to the article?

AThe Federal Reserve is currently facing the core choice of either keeping patient and holding interest rates steady, or proactively raising interest rates to combat stubbornly high inflation.

QAccording to Kansas City Fed President Schmid, what is the number one risk to the U.S. economy?

AKansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid stated that inflation is the number one risk currently facing the U.S. economy.

QWhy does San Francisco Fed President Daly suggest that providing forward guidance might be misleading now?

ASan Francisco Fed President Mary Daly suggests that providing forward guidance on interest rates might be misleading because economic uncertainty is too high, and the Fed needs to wait for how the economic situation evolves.

QWhat is the article's view on AI's current impact on inflation and monetary policy?

AThe article, citing Fed officials, states that AI is currently neither pushing up nor lowering inflation, and it has not yet led to widespread productivity gains. Therefore, its effect is not an urgent issue for monetary policy decisions, which operate on a roughly 12-month cycle.

QWhat is the market's expectation for the upcoming FOMC meeting in June regarding the policy rate?

AThe market generally expects the Federal Reserve to keep the policy interest rate unchanged at the upcoming FOMC meeting in June.

Letture associate

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报55 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报55 min fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 h fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 h fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片