Eric Trump Calls Banks ‘Anti-American’ Amid Stablecoin Yield Fight in U.S. Crypto Bill

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-05

Introduzione

Eric Trump, co-founder of World Liberty Financial and son of Donald Trump, has criticized major banks as "anti-American" for opposing stablecoin rewards in proposed U.S. crypto legislation. He accuses banks of lobbying against features that allow consumers to earn 4-5% yields on stablecoins, arguing they want to protect their own low-interest savings accounts and prevent deposit outflows. This debate is central to the Clarity Act, which aims to establish crypto rules. World Liberty Financial, issuer of the USD1 stablecoin, is seeking a banking charter amid this conflict. Donald Trump also criticized banks after meeting with Coinbase's CEO, highlighting the broader tension between traditional finance and the emerging crypto sector over consumer choice and financial innovation.

Eric Trump, who is the co-founder of World Liberty Financial and the son of U.S. President Donald Trump, has criticized major banks for opposing stablecoin rewards in ongoing discussions on crypto legislation. He accused the large banks of lobbying against stablecoin yield features that could enable Americans to earn high returns on their digital assets.

Yield’s Debate

Trump argued that major banks are trying to prevent consumers from accessing better interest rates through crypto platforms. According to Trump, banks currently pay very low interest on the savings accounts while earning higher rates themselves from the federal reserves. He also claimed that the crypto platforms offer stablecoin rewards of around 4% to 5%, which is the reason the banks are pushing lawmakers to restrict those rewards.

The dispute is linked to the ongoing discussion on the Clarity Act, which aims to set rules for crypto. Banking groups are reportedly lobbying against stablecoin yield features. They argue that allowing these rewards could move deposits away from the traditional banks. This debate is also important for World Liberty Financial, which issues a stablecoin called USD1. The company is currently seeking approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to obtain the banking charter.

President Donald Trump also commented on the issue and criticized banks for resisting stablecoin provisions. His remarks came shortly after a meeting with Brian Armstrong, who is the CEO of Coinbase, a major cryptocurrency exchange, who had previously withdrawn support for the bill over concerns about its stablecoin rules.

This dispute highlights a conflict between the traditional banks and the crypto sectors over digital finance. Crypto supporters argue that these products give consumers more options and better returns. The outcome of this dispute influences how the stablecoin operates and competes with the banks in the future.

Highlighted Crypto News:

KuCoin Tops CryptoQuant 2025 Exchange Transparency Rankings

TagsCrypto Billeric trumpStablecoin

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is Eric Trump's main criticism against major banks in the context of the crypto bill discussions?

AEric Trump criticizes major banks for being 'anti-American' and lobbying against stablecoin yield features that would allow Americans to earn high returns on digital assets, arguing they want to prevent consumers from accessing better interest rates.

QWhat specific interest rate advantage do crypto platforms offer compared to traditional banks according to the article?

ACrypto platforms offer stablecoin rewards of around 4% to 5%, which is significantly higher than the very low interest rates banks currently pay on savings accounts.

QWhich legislative act is central to the stablecoin regulation debate mentioned in the article?

AThe Clarity Act, which aims to establish rules for cryptocurrency, is central to the ongoing debate about stablecoin regulation.

QWhat is the name of the stablecoin issued by Eric Trump's company, World Liberty Financial?

AWorld Liberty Financial issues a stablecoin called USD1.

QWhich cryptocurrency exchange CEO recently met with Donald Trump and had withdrawn support for the crypto bill?

ABrian Armstrong, the CEO of Coinbase, met with Donald Trump and had previously withdrawn support for the bill due to concerns about its stablecoin rules.

Letture associate

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit46 min fa

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit46 min fa

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手50 min fa

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手50 min fa

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbit53 min fa

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbit53 min fa

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbit57 min fa

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbit57 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片