Double Zero slides 12% as momentum fades – Is the worst over for 2Z?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-26

Introduzione

Double Zero (2Z) has declined over 12% amid a broader market downturn and significant long liquidations exceeding $719,000. Technical indicators remain bearish, with the MACD showing a death cross and the RSI trending downward around 46, suggesting potential further losses. A key demand zone lies between $0.114 and $0.118, which could serve as support. A rebound from this level toward $0.15 would represent a 28% gain, but current spot buying of around $874,400 appears insufficient to drive a strong recovery. Despite the bearish signals, derivatives traders maintain a slight long bias, with a Long-to-Short Ratio of 1.043 and a positive funding rate, indicating lingering bullish sentiment.

Double Zero has moved decisively lower following a major liquidity shift that triggered broad capitulation.

At press time, the altcoin was down over 12%, with rebound prospects appearing muted as momentum remains notably weak. While market participants continue to anticipate a reversal, the technical confluence needed to support such a move has yet to materialize.

Downtrend deepens as 2Z loses momentum

Double Zero’s [2Z] decline does not appear to be slowing at the time of publication. From a technical perspective, the chart showed an absence of immediate support levels—zones that typically act as buffers for price stabilization or rebounds.

However, the chart does reveal a lower ascending support that could serve as a potential pivot for price action.

This structure aligns with a demand zone between $0.114 and $0.118, an area that may provide the necessary footing for the price to stabilize or attempt a recovery.

A rebound from this zone toward the $0.15 level would represent a potential 28% upside, with additional gains possible if momentum improves.

That said, trader confidence remains fragile. Over the past 24 hours, long-positioned traders have incurred losses exceeding $719,700, compared to just $2,400 in losses recorded by short sellers.

Technical indicators tilt firmly bearish

Technical indicators continue to argue against aggressive accumulation at current levels. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) remained firmly bearish after printing a classic “death cross.”

This pattern forms when the MACD line crosses below the signal line and is often associated with prolonged downside pressure. Historically, such setups have preceded sharper declines as selling momentum accelerates.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) reinforces this bearish setup. At the time of publication, the RSI had slipped into the bearish zone between 30 and 50 and printed a reading of 46, with momentum still trending lower.

A sustained decline in the RSI typically reflects weakening market strength and raises the likelihood of continued downside price action.

If both indicators remain under pressure—particularly with the MACD firmly in negative territory—2Z could face deeper losses in the near term.

Spot demand lags as derivatives traders hold long bias

Spot market activity showed signs of accumulation, with buyers adding to positions over the past two weeks. However, the scale of these purchases remains modest.

According to CoinGlass Spot Netflow data, total spot purchases over this period amounted to approximately $874,400. While this inflow may help slow the pace of the decline, it remains insufficient to provide meaningful price support.

Meanwhile, sentiment in the 2Z perpetual market continued to hint at a potential rebound near the previously identified support zone.

The Long-to-Short Ratio, which tracks directional positioning—above 1 indicating long dominance and below 1 signaling short control—supports this view.

At press time, the ratio stood at 1.043. In addition, the Open Interest–Weighted Funding Rate printed a positive 0.0019%, suggesting that capital positioning remained tilted in favor of bullish traders.

This indicates that despite recent liquidation losses, trader conviction on the long side remains intact. Whether this positioning holds may prove pivotal in shaping 2Z’s next directional move.


Final Thoughts

  • 2Z may extend its decline until it finds a support level capable of cushioning further losses, even as a potential 28% rebound remains in view.
  • Indicators point to a short-term pullback, although spot traders and perpetual 2Z traders continue to maintain a bullish bias.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the percentage decline in Double Zero (2Z) at the time of publication?

ADouble Zero was down over 12% at the time of publication.

QWhat is the potential upside percentage if 2Z rebounds from the demand zone to the $0.15 level?

AA rebound from the demand zone to the $0.15 level would represent a potential 28% upside.

QWhat key bearish technical pattern did the MACD indicator show?

AThe MACD indicator showed a classic 'death cross', which occurs when the MACD line crosses below the signal line.

QWhat does a Long-to-Short Ratio above 1 indicate for the 2Z perpetual market?

AA Long-to-Short Ratio above 1 indicates that long positions are dominant in the market.

QWhat was the total value of spot purchases over the two weeks leading up to the article?

ATotal spot purchases over the past two weeks amounted to approximately $874,400.

Letture associate

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit11 min fa

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit11 min fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1 h fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1 h fa

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片