Dogecoin ETFs Dead In March? Only 2 Days Of Inflows And Less Than $1M – Details

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-26Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-26

Introduzione

The Dogecoin ETFs, approved in November 2025, have experienced a significant decline in investor interest by March 2026. According to data from SoSoValue, the ETFs saw only two days of net inflows during the month, totaling less than $1 million. This follows a volatile performance history: a strong start with $2.16 million in inflows in November 2025, a sharp drop to $177,890 in December, and a peak of $4.07 million in January 2026. Total net assets have also fluctuated, falling from a high of $10.15 million in January to $9.51 million at the time of reporting. The funds have seen over a week of zero inflows, and daily trading values remain below $1 million, indicating waning demand.

When the Dogecoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) were first approved back in November 2025, it came as a welcome development for the community. This put the meme coin in the league with the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum, as they continue to make waves with their Spot ETFs. The first month of trading had gone as expected, attracting over $2 million in inflow from investors. But with the month of March 2026, things look to be going left for the Dogecoin ETFs.

Dogecoin ETFs Have Seen Only 2 Days Of Inflow So Far

The month of March is almost over, with only about five days left, but so far, Dogecoin ETFs have only seen two days of net inflow, according to data from SoSoValue. The first of these inflows was at the start of the month when around $779,100 flowed into Dogecoin ETFs, pushing its cumulative total inflow so far above $7.6 million for the first time.

After this initial inflow that was recorded on March 2, 2026, the Dogecoin ETFs would go dormant again. In the almost two weeks that followed, there was 0 inflow into the exchange-traded products, while traded values fluctuated wildly, and interest waned.

Then, on March 13, 2026, there was another inflow trend, although lower this time. The value came out to $193,360 in daily inflows, and this brought the total inflows for the month to $972,460. Interestingly, this figure was miles ahead of what was recorded in the previous month of February, with total monthly inflows of $252,530, with only a single day of inflows.

Since the March 13 inflows, Dogecoin ETFs have gone back to 0 inflows once again, with over a week of no liquidity moving into the funds. Total daily traded values across the funds have also remained below the $1 million mark, while Total Net Assets sit at $9.51 million at the time of this report.

How The ETFs Have Fared So Far

With barely five months of trading, the Dogecoin ETFs have had a rather interesting trajectory. Following the first month of trading that saw monthly net inflows hit $2.16 million in November 2025, the funds would go on to have their worst month so far right after. In December 2025, total net inflows to Dogecoin ETFs came out to only $177,890, and the total net assets dropped from $6.29 million in November to $5.07 million by December.

January 2026 has been the most bullish month so far, with $4.07 million in monthly net inflows, $12.31 million in total traded value, and total net assets hitting $10.15 million. The funds are yet to reclaim the peak set in January, with total net assets falling to $8.39 million in February before rising to $9.32 million in March 2026.

DOGE fails to break above $0.1 | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com

Domande pertinenti

QHow many days of net inflow have Dogecoin ETFs seen in March 2026 according to SoSoValue data?

ATwo days of net inflow.

QWhat was the total value of inflows into Dogecoin ETFs for the month of March 2026?

A$972,460.

QWhich month was the most bullish for Dogecoin ETFs in terms of monthly net inflows?

AJanuary 2026, with $4.07 million in monthly net inflows.

QWhat was the total net assets of Dogecoin ETFs at the time of the report?

A$9.51 million.

QHow did the inflows in February 2026 compare to those in March 2026?

AMarch's inflows of $972,460 were significantly higher than February's total monthly inflows of $252,530.

Letture associate

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbit34 min fa

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbit34 min fa

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight News48 min fa

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight News48 min fa

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit57 min fa

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit57 min fa

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbit58 min fa

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbit58 min fa

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

The article reports a major security incident involving Humanity Protocol (H), resulting in over $31 million stolen. The team attributes the hack to a private key leak from a Humanity Foundation member, leading to a rapid sale of H tokens and a 90% price drop. However, prominent on-chain investigator ZachXBT suggests the event might be an "exit scam" orchestrated by the team, rather than an external hack. This suspicion is fueled by the team's controversial history, including past management failures, legal issues, and previous scandals like outsourced technology and problematic airdrops. Further investigation reveals that the core team behind Humanity is already involved with a new project called "Everything," which recently secured funding. This has led to community speculation that the alleged hack is a deliberate scheme to abandon the H project while shifting focus and resources to their new venture, leaving investors to bear the losses. The article questions whether this is a genuine security failure or a premeditated "rug pull" strategy.

Odaily星球日报2 h fa

Over $31 Million Stolen from Humanity, Is the Team Behind It Paving the Way for a New Project?

Odaily星球日报2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures