Dogecoin: Breakout attempts fail, short sellers regain control – What’s next?

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-01-19Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-19

Introduzione

Dogecoin's attempt to break through the $0.15 resistance level on January 13th failed, leading to a continued price decline. This downward trend was further accelerated by Bitcoin's recent volatility. Market data shows the memecoin sector lost 6.66% of its market cap in 24 hours, with traders seeing significant long liquidations. The price has fallen below the key long-term support level of $0.129, indicating severe selling pressure. Analysis suggests seller dominance has persisted since October, with each price bounce being used for profit-taking. The overall sentiment remains bearish, with a potential short-term bounce to $0.14-$0.15 seen as a selling opportunity. A significant shift in momentum would require a reclaim of the $0.15 level and a resurgence in Bitcoin's price to improve capital flows into DOGE.

On the 13th of January, Dogecoin [DOGE] bulls forced a short-term rally to $0.15.

On that day alone, the leading memecoin had rallied by 8.8%, challenging the local supply zone where a breakout attempt failed in the first week of the month.

The second try was a failure too, and DOGE prices have been falling since then. Bitcoin’s [BTC] wobble in the early hours of Monday sent Dogecoin prices further south.

CoinMarketCap data showed that the past 24 hours saw the memecoin sector shed 6.66% of its total market cap. Traders faced $35.42 million in liquidations in the past 24 hours, with $33.69 million being long positions.

Dogecoin slips below key long-term support

The $0.150 supply zone was just below the key swing high from November at $0.156. Breaching it would have flipped the swing structure bullishly, but it was not to be.

Though the CMF was above +0.05 at the time of writing, the OBV signaled the seller dominance since October has not let up. Moreover, the $0.129 low from April 2025 was ceded to bears yet again.

It showed the severe selling pressure on Dogecoin. Each bounce is a profit-taking opportunity for underwater investors.

Arguing the bullish DOGE case

This was a tough argument to make. In 2025, Dogecoin shed 62.8%, measured from the year’s open to its close.

A recent AMBCrypto report highlighted the lack of conviction from smart money, evidenced by the 500 million DOGE deposit to Binance.

Traders’ call to action – Sell a bounce

There were sizeable imbalances overhead on the hourly chart. The one at $0.137 coincided with the $0.136-$0.140 zone, where the memecoin consolidated over the past few days before plummeting lower.

Traders can use a retest of $0.140 to go short if they see a lower timeframe trend shift to act as an early signal of a bearish reversal. Alternatively, the $0.150 was another supply zone to sell at.

Traders looking to buy would want a reclaim of $0.150 to signal strength from the bullish side.


Final Thoughts

  • The Dogecoin price prediction was bearish for the rest of the month. A price bounce toward $0.14-$0.15 is possible before another move lower.
  • A Bitcoin resurgence is necessary to shift sentiment and encourage capital flows to DOGE, which have been weak after the first week of January.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the key resistance level that Dogecoin failed to break out of in early January?

AThe key resistance level was the $0.150 supply zone, which was just below the key swing high from November at $0.156.

QWhat does the data on liquidations in the past 24 hours indicate about market sentiment?

AThe data indicates a bearish sentiment, as $35.42 million in liquidations occurred, with the vast majority ($33.69 million) being long positions.

QAccording to the On-Balance Volume (OBV) indicator, what has been the dominant market force since October?

AThe OBV indicator signaled that seller dominance has been the dominant market force since October and has not let up.

QWhat is suggested as a potential trading strategy for a price bounce towards $0.14-$0.15?

AThe suggested strategy is to sell into a bounce, using a retest of the $0.140 or $0.150 supply zones as an opportunity to go short.

QWhat event does the article state is necessary to shift sentiment and encourage capital flows back into Dogecoin?

AA Bitcoin resurgence is stated as necessary to shift sentiment and encourage capital flows back into Dogecoin.

Letture associate

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit19 min fa

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit19 min fa

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit29 min fa

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit29 min fa

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit29 min fa

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit29 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片