Does Europe need Euro-pegged stablecoins? Bundesbank chief says…

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-02-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-17

Introduzione

Europe is increasingly focused on developing euro-denominated stablecoins, a wholesale CBDC, and a digital euro to enhance its financial sovereignty, according to Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel. He emphasized that euro-pegged stablecoins could facilitate low-cost cross-border payments for individuals and businesses. This shift comes as Europe seeks strategic independence amid a changing transatlantic partnership, despite strong economic ties with the U.S. including €5.4 trillion in mutual investments and significant contributions to global trade and GDP.

Europe is playing catch-up in the global money race. According to Joachim Nagel, president of the Deutsche Bundesbank, the region is now looking more seriously at euro-denominated stablecoins!

Digital money for financial independence

Nagel recently said that Europe should support euro-denominated stablecoins, a wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC), and a digital euro to strengthen the region’s financial sovereignty.

At the New Year’s Reception of the American Chamber of Commerce in Frankfurt, he said,

“I also see merit in euro-denominated stablecoins, as they can be used for cross-border payments by individuals and firms at low cost.”

The European Union and the United States are connected economically, with around €5.4 trillion in mutual investment stock and a partnership that accounts for roughly 30% of global trade and 44% of global GDP.

But now, Europe is considering strategic independence.

“These days, however, the previously solid ground of the transatlantic partnership values seems shaky.”

Challenges to growth

Domande pertinenti

QWhat did Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel say about euro-denominated stablecoins?

AJoachim Nagel stated that Europe should support euro-denominated stablecoins, as they can be used for cross-border payments by individuals and firms at low cost.

QWhat three digital currency solutions did Nagel mention to strengthen Europe's financial sovereignty?

ANagel mentioned euro-denominated stablecoins, a wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC), and a digital euro as solutions to strengthen Europe's financial sovereignty.

QWhere did Bundesbank chief Joachim Nagel make his comments about euro stablecoins?

AHe made these comments at the New Year's Reception of the American Chamber of Commerce in Frankfurt.

QWhat economic statistics highlight the connection between the European Union and the United States?

AThe EU and US have around €5.4 trillion in mutual investment stock and their partnership accounts for roughly 30% of global trade and 44% of global GDP.

QHow does Nagel describe the current state of the transatlantic partnership values?

ANagel described the previously solid ground of the transatlantic partnership values as currently seeming 'shaky'.

Letture associate

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit2 h fa

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit2 h fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手2 h fa

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手2 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit4 h fa

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片