Dissecting Circle's Q1 Earnings Report: After the Interest Rate Dividend Ebbs, USDC Prepares for a Big Chess Game

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-11

Introduzione

Title: Circle Q1 2026 Earnings: Shifting Strategy as Interest Rate Windfall Subsides Circle reported its Q1 2026 financial results. While total revenue and reserve income of $694M slightly missed expectations, adjusted EBITDA grew 24% to $151M. A key trend is the decline in reserve income due to lower Federal Reserve interest rates, which Circle is countering by diversifying its revenue streams. Notably, non-interest "Other Revenue" hit a record $42M. USDC's circulation reached 77 billion, up 28% year-over-year, but its on-chain transaction volume surged 263% to $21.5 trillion, indicating significantly higher utilization in payments and DeFi. Financially, the core RLDC Margin improved to 41%, showing better cost control. However, operating expenses nearly doubled, partly due to post-IPO stock compensation costs. Looking ahead, Circle is expanding beyond being a simple stablecoin issuer. It highlighted the $222M presale for its Arc Network (valued at $3B) and launched new services like Managed Payments and the "Agent Stack" for AI-driven commerce. The company's strategy is evolving to position USDC as the foundational dollar network for the internet, targeting broader payment, enterprise, and AI agent economies.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma(@azuma_eth)

Before the US stock market opened on May 11th, stablecoin issuer Circle officially announced its Q1 2026 earnings report.

The financial report data shows, Circle's total revenue and reserve income for Q1 was $694 million, slightly below market expectations of $715 million; EPS was $0.21, higher than market expectations of $0.18; adjusted EBITDA was $151 million, a year-on-year increase of 24%; net profit was $55 million, a year-on-year decrease of 15%.

Affected by the earnings release, CRCL experienced significant pre-market volatility, with nearly a 6% pre-market gain gradually being erased amid fluctuations. As of 22:00, after the opening of US stocks, CRCL once continued to plummet but then quickly turned from loss to gain, temporarily quoted at $115.74, with an intraday increase of 2.52%.

Interpretation of Core Data

As shown in the report, Circle's total revenue and reserve income for this quarter was $694 million. Although it increased by 20% year-on-year, it broke the growth trend of previous consecutive quarters ($579M → $658M → $740M → $770M → $694M) and also fell short of market expectations.

Circle attributed the slowdown in revenue growth to a decline in the Reserve Return Rate. On December 10, 2025, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate target range by 25 basis points to 3.5%-3.75%, thereby compressing the yield of Circle's primarily US Treasury-backed reserve assets.

However, despite the relatively weak revenue, this earnings report from Circle still reveals some locally optimistic data.

First, Circle's Other Revenue, excluding Reserve Income, reached a new high of $42 million, showing a growth trend over multiple consecutive quarters ($21M → $24M → $29M → $37M → $42M).

As we mentioned in this afternoon's article "Earnings Report, Bill, Federal Reserve... Circle Faces Three Major Tests This Week", this means Circle's revenue sources are becoming more diversified. Its platform services, API tools, and payment products are generating tangible commercial returns, and reliance on interest income is decreasing.

Another noteworthy data point is RLDC Margin, the profit margin after revenue minus distribution costs. This reflects the core business profitability after deducting distribution expenses and is widely regarded as Circle's most crucial profit metric. This quarter, Circle's RLDC Margin reached 41%, achieving growth for four consecutive quarters (36% → 39% → 40% → 41%). This means Circle's control over distribution costs is becoming more efficient.

Now let's look at the expense situation. Distribution and Transaction Costs remain Circle's largest expense item, reaching a high of $405 million this quarter, a 17% year-on-year increase. This expense is mainly tied to the USDC distribution contract with Coinbase. This contract is set to expire in August this year. How it is renewed (primarily looking at whether the revenue-sharing ratio will be adjusted) will greatly impact Circle's subsequent expenses and profit status.

Apart from distribution costs, Total Operating Expenses also surged from $138 million last year to $242 million, a year-on-year increase of 76%. The primary increase came from Compensation expenses, which nearly doubled from $75.62 million to $138 million—Circle explained this was mainly due to IPO-related stock-based compensation expenses and related taxes.

Affected by the surge in expenses, Circle's operating profit for this quarter dropped to $45 million from $92.94 million in the same period last year; net profit attributable to common shareholders decreased from $64.79 million to $55.25 million; earnings per share (EPS) were $0.23, diluted to $0.21.

Other Operational Highlights

In addition to core financial data, Circle disclosed several operational highlights in its Q1 earnings report.

The most crucial data point is that USDC's circulation at the end of Q1 reached 77 billion tokens, a year-on-year increase of 28%. However, at the same time, USDC's on-chain transaction volume in Q1 reached a staggering $21.5 trillion, a year-on-year increase of 263%. Visa Onchain Analytics data also shows that USDC accounted for 63% of the total stablecoin transaction volume in Q1.

The transaction volume growth rate far exceeding the circulation growth rate means that the turnover and application frequency of each USDC token on-chain has significantly increased — USDC is not lying statically in wallets but is being genuinely and frequently used in scenarios like payments, DeFi, and cross-border settlements.

Another important point is that Circle also disclosed that its payment network, Arc Network, has completed a $222 million ARC token pre-sale with a valuation as high as $3 billion. Investors include renowned institutions such as a16z, BlackRock, Intercontinental Exchange, Standard Chartered, and SBI. The ARC token whitepaper disclosed today shows that 60% of the tokens will be allocated to the ecosystem (token sales, developer grants, network growth); 25% will be allocated to Circle (protocol development, staking & governance); 15% will be allocated to a long-term reserve (strategic flexibility & economic stability).

In the subsequent earnings call, when asked how the ARC tokens belonging to Circle would be accounted for, Circle Co-founder and CEO Jeremy Allaire stated: "When ARC tokens are created, they will be recorded on Circle's balance sheet at cost, and their cost is zero. Subsequently, after Circle fulfills its obligations under the token pre-sale agreement, we will recognize the value of these tokens as 'Other Revenue', and this value will then be directly reflected in RLDC and Adjusted EBITDA."

This also means that in a future quarter, Circle's reported revenue data will look "exceptionally good" due to the inclusion of ARC token value.

Furthermore, the estimated annual transaction volume for Circle's institutional payment service, Circle Payments Network (CPN) (extrapolated based on 30-day data as of March 31st), has also reached $8.3 billion; In April, Circle launched the "Managed Payments" product to expand its payment offerings. This product allows financial institutions to launch stablecoin payment services without having to manage digital assets themselves.

To prepare for the AI Agent-driven commercial future, Circle also announced the launch of Agent Stack, a set of infrastructure services and toolkits for the AI Agent economy, designed to provide high-speed, low-cost financial service capabilities for autonomously operating AI Agents. Jeremy Allaire's vision for this is: "With the ARC token pre-sale, the momentum building for Arc Network, and the launch of Agent Stack, we are building trusted infrastructure for AI-native economic activity and a more programmable internet financial system."

Circle's New Chess Game

Against the macroeconomic backdrop of receding high-interest dividends (Warsh is expected to promote a "rate cut + balance sheet reduction" strategy upon succeeding as Fed Chair), Circle clearly does not want to be entirely at the mercy of the Federal Reserve's interest rate policy. Its strategic focus has quietly shifted towards diversified expansion of non-interest revenue.

Judging from the details disclosed in this quarterly report, after successively launching services like CPN, Managed Payments, Agent Stack, and Arc Network, Circle's goal is no longer just to be a "stablecoin issuer." It is attempting to build USDC into the underlying dollar network for the internet era. Under this new vision, Circle's service targets are no longer limited to exchanges or crypto-native users but are extending comprehensively into cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and even the AI Agent economy.

Circle's ambition is now abundantly clear: to transform USDC from a "static reserve asset" into "flowing economic blood." This is perhaps the big chess game Circle truly wants to play.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat were Circle's total revenue and reserve income for Q1 2026, and how did it compare to market expectations?

ACircle's total revenue and reserve income for Q1 2026 was $6.94 billion, which was slightly below the market expectation of $7.15 billion.

QAccording to the article, what are the two key positive data points from Circle's Q1 report despite slowing revenue growth?

ATwo key positive data points are: 1) Other Revenue (excluding Reserve Income) reached a new high of $42 million, showing a consecutive growth trend. 2) The RLDC Margin, a core profitability indicator, reached 41%, marking four consecutive quarters of growth.

QWhat major operational highlight regarding USDC usage is mentioned in the Q1 report?

AA major operational highlight is that the on-chain transaction volume of USDC reached $21.5 trillion in Q1, a 263% year-over-year increase, significantly outpacing its circulation growth of 28%. This indicates much higher frequency of real-world use.

QWhat is the significance of the Arc Network and its ARC token for Circle's future financials, as explained by CEO Jeremy Allaire?

AThe ARC tokens allocated to Circle will be recorded on its balance sheet at cost (which is zero). Once Circle fulfills its obligations under the token presale agreement, the value of these tokens will be recognized as 'other revenue,' which will directly boost the RLDC and Adjusted EBITDA figures in a future quarter.

QHow does the article describe Circle's strategic shift and ultimate ambition in the context of declining interest rate benefits?

ACircle's strategy is shifting from relying on interest income to diversifying into non-interest revenue streams. Its ultimate ambition is to transform USDC from a 'static reserve asset' into 'circulating economic blood,' aiming to build it as the foundational dollar network for the internet era, extending into cross-border payments, corporate settlement, and the AI Agent economy.

Letture associate

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手1 min fa

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手1 min fa

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbit32 min fa

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbit32 min fa

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbit1 h fa

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片