Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-20

Introduzione

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Three-quarters of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. It's not bad luck; the rules of the game have changed. While you're still looking at candlestick patterns for formations, arbitrage bots have already made their profit. Data shows that truly profitable traders either use algorithmic systematic execution or place large bets on asymmetric opportunities with high conviction. Manual retail traders watching screens are becoming the exit liquidity for others.

About 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are in a loss-making position.

The reality is that people trading manually on Hyperliquid are competing against systems that never rest. The trading opportunity you just discovered has likely already been priced in by the system.

When you see a certain pattern, chances are it has already been arbitraged.

Extreme funding rates are balanced in an instant.

Technical patterns have already appeared across more than 50 order books.

News headlines are priced in as soon as they appear.

What the most profitable traders are doing:

→1. Running systematic strategies (the second most profitable address executed 261,000 trades this month with a 64.75% win rate)

→ 2. Holding high-conviction positions, betting on asymmetric returns (a wallet made $4.48 million with just 50 trades and a 28% win rate)

→ 3. Using algorithms as execution tools while making macro judgments manually

If you have timing in narratives, structural insight, or conviction when everyone else capitulates, you can still make profitable trades.

But if your trades are based on chart patterns or news you saw on X, you are likely just exit liquidity.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what percentage of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money, and what is presented as the primary reason?

AApproximately 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. The primary reason is that manual traders are competing against automated, systemized strategies that execute trades faster and more efficiently, often pricing in opportunities before a human trader can act.

QWhat are the two main strategies used by the most profitable traders on Hyperliquid, as described in the article?

AThe two main strategies are: 1. Running systematic, automated strategies (one example executed 261,000 trades with a 64.75% win rate). 2. Holding high-conviction positions to bet on asymmetric opportunities (one wallet made $4.48M with only 50 trades, despite a 28% win rate).

QThe article suggests that several common trading signals are often ineffective. Name at least three of these signals.

AThree common but often ineffective signals mentioned are: 1. Technical chart patterns (which appear across many order books). 2. Extreme funding rates (which get arbitraged instantly). 3. News headlines (which are priced in immediately upon release).

QWhat role does the article suggest algorithms can play for a trader who still wants to make manual, high-level decisions?

AThe article suggests using algorithms as an execution tool. A trader can make macro or high-level directional judgments manually, and then use an algorithm to handle the rapid, systematic execution of trades based on that judgment.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what kind of manual trader is most likely to succeed, and what kind is most likely to fail?

AA manual trader who succeeds is likely one acting on deep narrative timing, unique structural insights, or having strong conviction when others are capitulating. A manual trader who fails is likely one whose decisions are based on commonly seen chart patterns or news headlines found on social media (like X), as they become 'exit liquidity' for others.

Letture associate

The Heart of the 'Artificial Sun': China Builds Largest Magnet for Fusion Reactor

On June 27, 2026, China's Institute of Plasma Physics announced the successful development and comprehensive testing of two key superconducting magnets for its "artificial sun" fusion reactor project. These magnets are crucial for containing plasma exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius within a vacuum chamber using powerful magnetic fields. The first is a D-shaped toroidal field magnet, claimed to be the world's largest for a fusion reactor. Measuring 21m long and weighing 582 tons, it has 1.3 times the volume and triple the stored energy of its counterpart in the international ITER project. Key parameters include a 98 kA operating current and 120 GJ of stored energy. Sixteen such magnets will eventually form a ring generating a central field of 6.5 Tesla to confine the plasma. Concurrently tested was a high-temperature superconducting central solenoid. It stably carries 60 kA of current and plays a critical role in inducing and sustaining the plasma current, essentially "igniting" the fusion reaction. All key technologies and materials are domestically developed, with 47 patents filed. The magnets are destined for the BEST (Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak) device, with assembly planned by 2027 and a demonstration of power generation targeted for around 2030. Fusion is pursued as a potential source of vast, clean energy without long-lived radioactive waste. While this marks a significant technical achievement, the article's concluding AI perspective notes the ongoing race between China's state-funded, large-scale approach and private ventures in other countries betting on compact, high-field magnets, highlighting funding sustainability as a key long-term factor.

cryptonews.ru11 min fa

The Heart of the 'Artificial Sun': China Builds Largest Magnet for Fusion Reactor

cryptonews.ru11 min fa

Prediction Markets Advise Holding Positions, While Citadel Securities Forecasts Fed Rate Hike Amid Trump Pressure on Central Bank

The U.S. Federal Reserve's FOMC meeting on July 28-29 is the main focus, with markets largely expecting interest rates to hold steady at 3.50-3.75%. CME's FedWatch tool gives a 66.3% probability for no change, while prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket show ~73% odds for unchanged rates. However, Citadel Securities' head of macro strategy, Frank Flight, predicts a surprise 25-basis-point hike to reinforce the Fed's inflation-fighting credibility under Chair Warsch. This meeting occurs amid political pressure, as former President Trump again called for rate cuts. Persistent inflation, driven partly by energy costs, and Middle East-related oil price volatility add uncertainty. The outcome is significant for Bitcoin and risk assets, which typically see larger moves when the Fed acts against consensus expectations. An unexpected hike could strengthen the dollar and pressure crypto prices, while a hold would shift market focus to the September meeting.

cryptonews.ru31 min fa

Prediction Markets Advise Holding Positions, While Citadel Securities Forecasts Fed Rate Hike Amid Trump Pressure on Central Bank

cryptonews.ru31 min fa

Blackrock invested $11.75 million in ETHA as ether funds again outperform bitcoin funds

Institutional demand for crypto started the week unevenly. Bitcoin ETFs faced net outflows of $11.64 million, marking a third consecutive day of withdrawals, with BlackRock's IBIT and Fidelity's FBTC seeing modest outflows. In contrast, Ethereum ETFs attracted $9.23 million in inflows, led by BlackRock's ETHA fund which pulled in $11.75 million. Meanwhile, Solana and XRP ETFs saw smaller inflows of $1.03 million and $592,470 respectively, while Hyperliquid ($HYPE) ETFs continued to struggle with significant outflows of $2.89 million. The data highlights a shift in institutional capital, showing selective preference for Ethereum and certain altcoins over Bitcoin and newer tokens like HYPE.

cryptonews.ru31 min fa

Blackrock invested $11.75 million in ETHA as ether funds again outperform bitcoin funds

cryptonews.ru31 min fa

During the Next Bull Run, Analyst Predicts XRP to Surge to $6

Crypto analyst Egrag Crypto has set a major first price target of $6.40 for XRP during the next bull market cycle. This represents a potential surge of over 500% from its recent price around $1.06. The analyst notes that XRP has finally tested a breakout from a multi-year symmetrical triangle pattern. However, he warns that the price could potentially drop below $1 to a support level near $0.88 if the breakout from this pattern fails. Before reaching the $6.40 target, Egrag Crypto outlines key resistance levels that must be overcome. First, XRP needs to break through $1.23, which could trigger a rally to $1.65. A sustained move above $1.65 is then needed to signal a rally toward the token's historical highs between $3.00 and $3.50. The bullish run to $6.40 would be confirmed with support from the 21-month Exponential Moving Average (EMA) and a stable hold above the all-time high. In such a scenario, the analyst calculates that the momentum could ultimately propel XRP as high as $30. Despite these projections, XRP's price has fallen nearly 43% since the start of 2026.

cryptonews.ru41 min fa

During the Next Bull Run, Analyst Predicts XRP to Surge to $6

cryptonews.ru41 min fa

The real reason DeFi projects that survived 2022 crash are shutting down now

A wave of DeFi projects that survived the 2022 bear market and subsequent crashes are shutting down in 2026. This includes platforms like Zapper, Botanix, Step Finance, Parsec, and Odos Protocol. Data shows over half of the 101 "dead" crypto projects tracked this year are DeFi-related. Analysts point to a shift in onchain economic activity rather than a simple market downturn or industry consolidation. While total fee generation remains high, capital has rotated from classic DeFi applications toward newer, adjacent platforms like Hyperliquid, Polymarket, and pump.fun. This increased competition means more protocols are vying for a smaller slice of the classic DeFi pie. Furthermore, capital has become more discerning. Investors now prioritize sustainable yield and proven track records over short-term token incentives. Institutional capital, in particular, favors established platforms. The industry is maturing, with infrastructure consolidating around major players like Uniswap and Aave. Innovation is moving "higher up the stack," as new projects increasingly build upon these established DeFi foundations instead of trying to replace them. The next wave of growth is expected to come from embedding DeFi infrastructure into traditional fintech platforms and financial services.

cointelegraph46 min fa

The real reason DeFi projects that survived 2022 crash are shutting down now

cointelegraph46 min fa

Trading

Spot