Curve Finance Accuses PancakeSwap of Copying StableSwap Code

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-07

Introduzione

Curve Finance has publicly accused PancakeSwap of copying its proprietary StableSwap code without permission, calling it a license breach and warning of legal and technical risks. The accusation, made on March 6 via X, came in response to PancakeSwap’s March 2 announcement of launching StableSwap on its Infinity platform. Curve urged PancakeSwap to seek proper licensing and collaboration to avoid legal issues and ensure user safety. In response, PancakeSwap acknowledged the dispute and entered private talks. Curve later softened its tone, suggesting a potential “build together” partnership. The outcome may set a precedent for intellectual property in open-source DeFi, with users concerned about network security implications.

The stablecoin-focused decentralised exchange, Curve Finance, has accused PancakeSwap of using its proprietary code to back the StableSwap function without having permission.

The accusation was made on March 6 on X, where the Curve team highlighted that this action shows a direct breach of the StableSwap licence, alerting to the legal and technical risks associated with replicating financial software without the proper regulatory framework.

The X post of Curve Finance mentioned that, “Dear PancakeSwap. Looks like you copied out code without permission. It is a violation of its licence. Not only is it illegal, but historically it has shown to be unwise for those who did it this way in other regards.

It further added that in any case. If you want to enjoy using StableSwap without legal problems and to borrow some of our expertise to keep users SAFU, you still can contact us for licensing and collaboration.”

The post was made in reply to the X post made by PancakeSwap on March 2 mentioning, “Introducing better prices for swapping stablecoins and tightly pegged assets, and Stableswap is now live on PancakeSwap Infinity.”

Settlement or Collaboration: What Will The Market Witness

Quickly after the complaint, the DeFi ecosystem witnessed a brief shock, as PancakeSwap had just executed said technology on its “Infinity” platform to provide stablecoin swaps having ultra-low slippage.

Replying to the public pressure, PancakeSwap accepted that it has so far started private talks to settle the dispute, while Curve softened its primary stance by recommending a possible strategic collaboration under the motto “build together”.

In the near future, the market will be able to witness if both decentralised giants manage to formalise an official licensing agreement or a technical alliance. The settlement of this conflict will set a prominent precedent concerning the safeguarding of intellectual property in open source, while users hope that this amalgamation does not compromise the security of the liquidity pools of the network.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

KuCoin Introduces KCS PulseDrop to Turn User Activity Into Crypto Rewards

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main accusation that Curve Finance has made against PancakeSwap?

ACurve Finance has accused PancakeSwap of copying its proprietary StableSwap code without permission, which is a direct breach of the StableSwap license.

QOn which date and platform did Curve Finance publicly make this accusation?

ACurve Finance made the accusation on March 6 on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

QWhat did PancakeSwap announce on March 2nd that prompted Curve's response?

AOn March 2nd, PancakeSwap announced the launch of its StableSwap feature on its 'Infinity' platform, offering better prices for swapping stablecoins and tightly pegged assets.

QHow did PancakeSwap respond to the public pressure following the accusation?

APancakeSwap accepted that it has initiated private talks to settle the dispute.

QWhat potential positive outcome did Curve Finance propose to PancakeSwap?

ACurve Finance proposed a potential strategic collaboration and offered to discuss licensing, suggesting they could 'build together'.

Letture associate

TON/GRAM price prediction – Telegram’s Gram wallet rollout lifts token: Can the rally continue?

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced the rollout of a native, non-custodial Gram wallet across the messaging app, describing it as potentially the largest deployment of a non-custodial wallet in history. The move aims to bring instant, zero-fee crypto transactions to Telegram's over one billion users, integrating digital assets directly into the platform. The news triggered a more than 7% price increase for TON/GRAM, pushing the token to around $1.53. However, it remains below its May peak near $2.80, facing immediate resistance around $1.60. Analysts suggest a break above this level could improve sentiment toward $1.80, while a failure to hold gains might see a retest of support near $1.40.

ambcrypto9 min fa

TON/GRAM price prediction – Telegram’s Gram wallet rollout lifts token: Can the rally continue?

ambcrypto9 min fa

How 40.8M staked ETH could strengthen Ethereum’s edge over Bitcoin

Ethereum is showing signs of strengthening against Bitcoin, driven by two key trends. First, significant whale accumulation is occurring, with large holders not just buying ETH but immediately staking 100% of it. This locks away supply, signaling long-term conviction. Ethereum's total staked ETH has reached a record 40.8 million, with a growing entry queue and 33.5% of supply now staked, further tightening liquid availability. Second, Ethereum's DeFi ecosystem is experiencing robust activity, with WETH whale transactions at a multi-year high and Total Value Locked (TVL) rising sharply. These converging factors—reduced supply from staking and increased on-chain demand—are translating into technical strength. The ETH/BTC ratio has broken above resistance and is approaching the 0.03 level, setting the stage for potential continued outperformance against Bitcoin.

ambcrypto42 min fa

How 40.8M staked ETH could strengthen Ethereum’s edge over Bitcoin

ambcrypto42 min fa

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手53 min fa

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手53 min fa

92.9% of crypto tokens launched since 2024 trade below TGE price: CryptoRank

A recent analysis by CryptoRank reveals that 92.9% of cryptocurrency tokens launched since 2024 and with a market capitalization exceeding $100 million are now trading below their initial Token Generation Event (TGE) price. The study, examining 113 projects, found only eight—or 7.1%—remain profitable, with the median return across the dataset being a stark -95.7%. Top performers include Hyperliquid (HYPE), which gained 1,519%, followed by Ondo Finance (ONDO), EverValue Coin (EVA), and Midnight Network (NIGHT). The findings indicate a market that has become highly selective, with capital concentrating on a small number of projects demonstrating real utility, adoption, or ecosystem growth. This contrasts with previous cycles where new tokens often saw sustained rallies. Investors are now scrutinizing factors like tokenomics, circulating supply, and unlock schedules more closely. This trend may influence future token launches, prompting projects to prioritize sustainable distribution models and long-term growth over aggressive initial valuations, as high fully diluted valuations (FDVs) and large future token unlocks often lead to significant price pressure.

ambcrypto54 min fa

92.9% of crypto tokens launched since 2024 trade below TGE price: CryptoRank

ambcrypto54 min fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1 h fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot