CT3 Announces Dedicated Storage Contracts to Expand Decentralized Storage Infrastructure

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-07-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-15

Introduzione

CT3 has transitioned its decentralized storage infrastructure to a dedicated Storage Contracts model to support platform growth, improve scalability, and expand storage capacity. This move follows rapid ecosystem growth with over 180,000 users and 500,000 uploads, each linked to an NFT access key. The new architecture distributes new uploads across multiple independent Storage Contracts, each linked to a fixed storage capacity, rather than relying on a single main contract. This segmentation enhances infrastructure resilience, allows for independent scaling of platform areas, and improves transparency in measuring resource utilization. Participants can finance the deployment of new Storage Contracts. The allocated capacity is used to store files uploaded via ct-3.cloud, and the resulting profit is shared between the investor and CT3. Financial performance depends on actual capacity utilization and the service margin. Each contract's operation is verifiable on-chain through its smart contract, with stored files represented by NFT keys containing storage metadata. This allows independent verification of key issuance, data volume, capacity utilization, and activity. For ct-3.cloud users, the transition requires no action, and existing NFT keys remain supported.

London, United Kingdom, July 15th, 2026, Chainwire

CT3 today announced the transition of its decentralized storage infrastructure to a dedicated Storage Contracts model designed to support continued platform growth, improve infrastructure scalability, and expand storage capacity as demand increases.

The transition follows rapid growth across the CT3 ecosystem, with more than 180,000 unique users having used the platform and more than 500,000 uploads completed. Each upload is linked to an NFT access key, allowing platform activity and network usage to be independently verified on-chain.

Continued growth in demand for ct-3.cloud services has increased pressure on the existing infrastructure. Processing all new uploads through a single main collection and one smart contract may reduce scaling flexibility and make storage capacity more difficult to manage as network activity expands.

Under the new architecture, new uploads will be distributed across dedicated Storage Contracts rather than a single main contract. Each Storage Contract is linked to a fixed amount of storage capacity and operates as an independent infrastructure segment with its own capacity, utilization level, and on-chain statistics.

The new model is intended to distribute workloads across multiple smart contracts, improve the transparency and measurement of resource utilization, and support the deployment of additional storage capacity as demand grows. Participants may finance the deployment of new Storage Contracts and the addition of storage capacity. The allocated capacity is used to store files uploaded through ct-3.cloud, while the resulting profit is shared between CT3 and the participant who financed the infrastructure expansion.

Infrastructure Segmentation

Previously, CT3 keys were issued primarily through the main collection and a single contract flow. As the platform expanded, this model became less flexible for handling different categories of data.

Storage Contracts divide the infrastructure into separate segments. Each segment:

  • operates through its own smart contract;
  • is linked to a specific amount of storage capacity;
  • can serve a particular category of files;
  • allows capacity utilization and workload to be measured independently;
  • reduces pressure on the main NFT key issuance process.

This separation makes the infrastructure more resilient and allows individual areas of the platform to scale without rebuilding the entire system.

How the Allocated Storage Capacity is Used

Each Storage Contract is linked to a defined amount of capacity within the CT3 network. Once activated, the corresponding storage space is supplied by network nodes and used to store data uploaded through ct-3.cloud.

The allocated capacity may be used for:

  • standard user files;
  • corporate archives;
  • automatic backups;
  • long-term datasets;
  • future CT3 products and applications.

Larger contracts can accommodate heavier files and more substantial flows of corporate or backup data. This allows the network to direct workloads to infrastructure segments with sufficient available capacity.

Storage Contract Economics

The commercial model behind Storage Contracts is based on the real use of CT3 infrastructure. The platform acquires storage capacity from node operators and provides it to ct-3.cloud customers at the market price of the storage service.

A participant finances the deployment of a new Storage Contract and the expansion of the network’s available capacity. Once launched, this capacity is used to store personal and corporate data, while the generated profit is distributed between the investor and CT3.

The financial performance of each contract depends on two main factors:

  • the actual utilization of the allocated capacity;
  • the margin between the cost of acquiring storage capacity and the price charged to end users.

Storage Contracts therefore allow participants to take part in the growth of CT3 infrastructure and potentially earn income linked to real demand for storage services. The more actively the allocated capacity is used, the greater the contract’s potential result.

On-chain transparency

The operation of each Storage Contract can be verified through the blockchain. Files stored within the allocated capacity are represented by NFT keys containing storage-related metadata.

The combined size of the files associated with these keys can be compared with the utilization figure displayed for the contract. Through the smart contract address, an investor can verify issued NFTs, collection activity, and the actual use of the capacity they helped finance.

This model makes it possible to independently verify:

  • the number of keys created;
  • the volume of stored data;
  • utilization of the allocated capacity;
  • activity within a specific Storage Contract;
  • the relationship between infrastructure usage and profit generation.

For ct-3.cloud users, the experience remains unchanged: both existing and new NFT keys continue to be supported, and the transition to the new architecture requires no additional action.

About CT3

CT3 is developing a decentralized data storage infrastructure that combines independent nodes, the ct-3.cloud interface, NFT access keys, and blockchain verification.

Users upload files through ct-3.cloud, after which the data is distributed across network nodes. An NFT key is created for every stored object, confirming access rights and containing the relevant storage metadata.

Within this model, nodes provide physical storage capacity, CT3 manages data distribution and access, while individual and corporate users generate demand for storage services.

As the number of users and uploads increases, the network must continuously expand its available capacity. At certain times, demand growth may outpace the addition of new capacity from node operators. Storage Contracts allow CT3 to add new resources in a structured way and allocate them to specific areas of use.

Contact

CMO
Rodrigo Pereira
CT3
contact@ct-3.ltd

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the primary purpose of CT3's new dedicated Storage Contracts model?

AThe primary purpose of CT3's new dedicated Storage Contracts model is to support continued platform growth, improve infrastructure scalability, and expand storage capacity in a managed way as demand increases.

QHow does the Storage Contracts model change how uploads are processed compared to the old system?

AUnder the new model, new uploads are distributed across dedicated Storage Contracts, each linked to a fixed amount of storage capacity. Previously, all uploads were processed through a single main collection and one smart contract.

QWhat are the two main factors that determine the financial performance of a Storage Contract?

AThe two main factors are: 1) the actual utilization of the allocated storage capacity, and 2) the margin between the cost of acquiring storage capacity from node operators and the price charged to end users.

QHow does the new infrastructure segmentation with Storage Contracts benefit the CT3 platform?

AInfrastructure segmentation makes the system more resilient by allowing individual areas to scale independently, reduces pressure on the main NFT key issuance process, and enables the platform to handle different categories of data more flexibly.

QWhat on-chain data can be verified to independently check the activity and utilization of a Storage Contract?

AThrough the smart contract address, one can independently verify the number of NFT keys created, the volume of stored data, the utilization of the allocated capacity, the activity within that specific contract, and the relationship between infrastructure usage and profit generation.

Letture associate

Understanding the Q2 Crypto Market in 5 Charts: RWA Explosion, Fundamentals Continue to Recover

Summary of Q2 Crypto Market: RWA Boom and Continued Fundamental Recovery The second quarter of 2026 presented a mixed picture for the crypto market. While major crypto asset prices declined by 36% in H1 2026, the fundamentals of the industry showed significant strength. Key highlights from Bitwise's market review include: 1. **Divergence Between Crypto Stocks and Tokens:** Crypto-related public equities, tracked by the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index, rose 23% in H1, outperforming most major asset classes. This signals robust investment opportunities within the crypto ecosystem, such as Bitcoin miners benefiting from AI and traditional finance firms deepening crypto integration, even during a bear market for tokens. 2. **Substantial Crypto Application Revenue:** Leading decentralized applications generated a combined $5.9 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, with top protocols like PancakeSwap, Hyperliquid, and Aave each nearing $1 billion. This demonstrates the existence of real, revenue-generating businesses within the sector. 3. **Breakout Growth in Real-World Asset (RWA) Tokenization:** The total value of tokenized real-world assets reached a record $33 billion in Q2, up 12% quarterly and 45% year-to-date. Growth is driven by tokenized U.S. Treasuries, corporate credit, equities, and venture capital shares, indicating accelerating institutional adoption. 4. **Expanding Prediction Markets:** Prediction market open interest hit a new high of $1.8 billion in Q2, with sports being a key category. Quarterly trading volume also reached a record $43 billion. Platforms like Polymarket represent a form of mainstream, albeit often unaware, adoption of crypto infrastructure for event betting, with further growth expected around the U.S. midterm elections. 5. **Attractive Profile of Crypto Equities:** The Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Index exhibited low 90-day rolling correlations with most major assets (developed market stocks, EM stocks, REITs, bonds, gold) and negative correlation with commodities. This combination of high returns and portfolio diversification is highly attractive to institutional investors. In conclusion, despite weak token prices, core industry fundamentals—including user activity, business revenues, and institutional adoption—continue to advance, building a strong foundation for the next market cycle.

Foresight News26 min fa

Understanding the Q2 Crypto Market in 5 Charts: RWA Explosion, Fundamentals Continue to Recover

Foresight News26 min fa

GPT-5.6 Cracks a 50-Year-Old Math Problem in 1 Hour, 64 AIs Claim the Crown Jewel of Graph Theory

OpenAI announced that its AI model, GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra, has successfully proved the 50-year-old Cycle Double Cover (CDC) conjecture in graph theory in under an hour. This long-standing problem, posed independently by several prominent mathematicians, states that every bridgeless finite undirected graph contains a set of cycles where each edge is covered exactly twice. The breakthrough was achieved using a novel "parallel test-time computation" (TTC) approach. Instead of a single AI working sequentially, the system deployed 64 concurrent AI agents, each exploring distinct proof strategies—from algebraic perspectives to structural induction. The process included strict protocols to avoid common research pitfalls: initial exploration of fundamentally different paths, preventing herd mentality by not revealing the most promising direction, and employing a "critic squad" of agents to rigorously attack and verify every proposed proof step. The system forbade vague assertions, demanding concrete lemmas and constructions. The resulting proof, generated by GPT-5.6 and formatted with Codex, employed a sophisticated multi-step strategy. It first reduced the general case to cubic graphs, then leveraged Tutte's group-flow theorem to establish the existence of a nowhere-zero 8-flow on the graph. A key inventive step was introducing a "two-element set" labeling scheme (Lemma 2.1), which, if satisfied, guarantees a cycle double cover. The AI then transformed this combinatorial condition into a large system of linear equations (Lemma 2.2), using linear algebra over finite fields to conclusively demonstrate that a solution always exists. Researchers highlighted that parallel TTC dramatically compressed the reasoning time, making deep, extended AI problem-solving practically feasible. While some observers marveled at the implications for mathematics and science, others questioned whether parallel breadth can fully substitute for deep, continuous logical chains. Nonetheless, this achievement marks a significant advance in AI's autonomous capacity for high-level abstract reasoning and complex proof generation.

marsbit31 min fa

GPT-5.6 Cracks a 50-Year-Old Math Problem in 1 Hour, 64 AIs Claim the Crown Jewel of Graph Theory

marsbit31 min fa

Prompt Engineering Paper Accepted at ICML 2026 Sparks Heated Debate Among Netizens

A paper on prompt engineering, titled "Verbalized Sampling (VS)," has been accepted by the prestigious machine learning conference ICML 2026, sparking significant debate online. The paper addresses the problem of "mode collapse" in large language models (LLMs), where models tend to produce repetitive, safe, and homogeneous outputs. Instead of proposing new training algorithms or model architectures, the authors introduce a simple yet effective prompt-based method. The core technique, Verbalized Sampling, instructs the model to generate multiple responses (e.g., five jokes) while also outputting a possible probability value for each. This prompt adjustment alone was shown to significantly increase output diversity by 1.6x to 2.1x in creative writing tasks, without compromising factual accuracy or safety. The authors argue that the root cause of mode collapse lies not in optimization algorithms but in the "typicality bias" present in human preference data used for alignment. Human annotators naturally favor familiar and fluent text, which steers models toward conservative outputs. The VS method aims to counteract this by leveraging the model's inherent pre-training distribution during inference. The paper's acceptance has led to polarized reactions. Critics argue that prompt engineering lacks the theoretical depth and algorithmic innovation expected from top-tier conferences like ICML, questioning its novelty, generalizability across models, and experimental scale. Some draw parallels to reproducibility crises in other fields, citing a potential over-reliance on empirical results. Supporters, including an author who responded online, defend the work's rigor. They emphasize its comprehensive problem analysis, theoretical grounding, mathematical derivation, and extensive quantitative experiments. Proponents compare VS to seminal techniques like Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, suggesting that inference-stage methods are becoming a core part of ML research capable of expanding model capabilities without retraining. The research was conducted by a team from Northeastern University, Stanford University, and West Virginia University, with Jiayi Zhang, Simon Yu, and Derek Chong as co-first authors.

marsbit32 min fa

Prompt Engineering Paper Accepted at ICML 2026 Sparks Heated Debate Among Netizens

marsbit32 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片