Cryptocurrencies in Picture as JPMorgan Trims Non-Oil Growth for Gulf Economies

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-02

Introduzione

JPMorgan has reduced its non-oil growth forecast for Gulf economies, citing ongoing Middle East conflicts. This has drawn attention to cryptocurrencies, which may face further declines, with Bitcoin potentially dropping to $60,000 by 2026. Current market conditions, including stronger safe-haven assets like Gold and the US Dollar, are contributing to the bearish outlook. Additionally, factors such as Federal Reserve rate decisions, inflation data, and geopolitical tensions are expected to influence the crypto market. The article emphasizes that this is not financial advice and encourages thorough research.

JPMorgan has trimmed its forecast of non-oil growth for Gulf economies. This has brought cryptocurrencies into the picture due to the ongoing Middle East conflicts. While the cut is mild, the impact could rather be broader than expected, given that Iran is one of the biggest oil producers in the world.

Reviewing Cryptocurrencies First

The effect on cryptocurrencies could lead to further declines – like BTC, which is estimated to go as low as $60,000 in 2026. For reference, the flagship cryptocurrency is trading at $66,301.04 at the time of writing this article. Cryptocurrencies are also expected to lose their grip, at least in the short-term, because Gold and Silver continue to remain alternatives as safe-haven.

Cryptocurrency price predictions are being revised accordingly. For instance, BTC was earlier estimated to surpass $80k by April 2026; however, it has been brought down to around $70,200. This is despite a volatility dropping from around 11% to approximately 6%.

Cryptocurrencies are also likely to be affected by the US Federal Reserve rate cut decision and/or the next inflation data. Moreover, artificial intelligence (AI) and tariffs gaining momentum could impact the digital asset sector too.

JPMorgan on GCC Non-Oil Growth Forecast

The middle-east conflict has brought JPMorgan back to the table to calibrate the non-oil growth forecast for GCC, the Gulf Cooperation Council. It has shortened the average growth by 0.3 percentage points. The biggest reduction has come for Bahrain and the UAE, each losing 0.5 percent points and 0.4 percent points, applicable in the same order.

The analyst has called this ongoing conflict elevated, adding that it is prevalent across multiple fronts. The final scenario would eventually depend on the outcome of the conflict.

JPMorgan has also taken a dig at rate cuts by the Bank of Israel. It has acknowledged the direct involvement of Israel to state that BOI may not cut rates in March 2026. Notably, JPMorgan had earlier expressed bullish sentiments for cryptocurrencies.

US Dollar and Gold Amid the Conflict

The US Dollar has gained strength on the index. It is up by 0.63% at 98.260 when the article is being drafted. That further reflects a strength of 0.40% over 5 days and 2.18% in a month.

Gold is also under the spotlight since gaining 2.18% over 24 hours. The precious metal is now trading at $5,391.620 per ounce after briefly hovering around $5,250. Such a surge in Gold prices is sliding the interest of investors away from risky ventures, like the crypto market.

The content of this article is neither a recommendation nor advice. Thorough research and risk assessment are strongly suggested.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Price Holds Steady as Iran Conflict Pushes Oil and Gold Higher

TagscryptocurrenciesJPMorgan

Domande pertinenti

QWhy has JPMorgan revised its non-oil growth forecast for Gulf economies?

AJPMorgan has revised its non-oil growth forecast for Gulf economies due to the ongoing Middle East conflicts, which it has described as 'elevated' and prevalent across multiple fronts.

QWhat is the new price prediction for Bitcoin (BTC) by April 2026 according to the revised forecasts?

AAccording to the revised forecasts, Bitcoin (BTC) is now estimated to be around $70,200 by April 2026, down from a previous prediction of surpassing $80,000.

QWhich two GCC countries saw the biggest reduction in their non-oil growth forecasts from JPMorgan?

ABahrain and the UAE saw the biggest reductions, with Bahrain's forecast cut by 0.5 percentage points and the UAE's by 0.4 percentage points.

QHow have traditional safe-haven assets like Gold performed, and what effect does this have on cryptocurrencies?

AGold has surged, gaining 2.18% over 24 hours and trading at $5,391.620 per ounce. This increase in traditional safe-haven assets is sliding investor interest away from risky ventures like the cryptocurrency market.

QWhat are some of the factors, besides the Middle East conflict, that could impact the cryptocurrency market?

ABesides the Middle East conflict, the cryptocurrency market could be affected by the US Federal Reserve's rate cut decision, upcoming inflation data, and the growing momentum of artificial intelligence (AI) and tariffs.

Letture associate

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2 h fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片