Crypto Platform Uphold Faces $5M Blow From New York Regulators

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-05-04Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-04

Uphold will hand over more than $5 million to customers it helped deceive — a payout that amounts to over five times what the company actually earned from the deal.

A Settlement With Real Teeth

New York Attorney General Letitia James announced the settlement this week, closing the book on Uphold’s role in promoting CredEarn, a crypto savings product run by Cred, LLC and its CEO Daniel Schatt.

From January 2019 through October 2020, Uphold pushed CredEarn to users through its platform and mobile app, billing it as a safe place to park money and earn solid annual returns. What users weren’t told was how those returns were actually being generated.

Cred was funding them through microloans to low-income video game players in China — borrowers who had no credit histories and no access to traditional banks. That detail never made it into Uphold’s pitch to customers.

The Insurance Claim That Wasn’t True

The misleading promotion didn’t stop at vague language. According to the AG’s office, Uphold told customers that Cred carried comprehensive insurance. That claim was false. No such insurance protecting retail investors from crypto losses existed in the industry at the time. On top of that, Uphold was operating without the required broker or commodity broker-dealer registration.

The risks caught up with everyone. Cred began racking up losses from its lending practices in March 2020. Eight months later, the company filed for bankruptcy. Thousands of Uphold customers worldwide were left with nothing to show for their deposits.

BTCUSD trading at $78,612 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

Under the terms of the settlement, affected users will be paid directly from the $5 million fund. Uphold is also owed $545,189 from Cred’s ongoing bankruptcy proceedings — and any money recovered from that process will be passed along to harmed investors as well. Customers can expect an email notification when funds reach their accounts.

“Investors should be able to trust the industry advice they receive,” James said in a statement, adding that her office would continue holding bad actors accountable for putting customers’ finances at risk.

Featured image from Finder, chart from TradingView

Letture associate

QCP Capital Analysts Explained Why Bitcoin Stalled at $63,000

QCP Capital's latest report explains that Bitcoin has stalled around $63,000, testing the lower boundary of its recent trading range ($62,500–$64,000). The retreat wasn't due to a single catalyst but stems from several cross-market pressures: heightened geopolitical risks, rising oil prices, uncertainty around global liquidity, and a muted reaction to positive U.S. macroeconomic data. While U.S. inflation and jobs data softened, reducing expectations of imminent Fed tightening, Bitcoin's price response has been subdued. This highlights the importance of other factors like trader positioning, liquidity conditions, and overall risk appetite. The regulatory landscape is progressing on two tracks: congressional legislation (like the CLARITY Act) is delayed, but SEC rulemaking continues. Corporate treasury activity, exemplified by Strategy's new Bitcoin monetization program, now creates a potential two-way flow, adding complexity to supply dynamics. Geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz keep oil prices elevated, impacting crypto indirectly through inflation expectations and financial conditions. Historical seasonality shows August and September are typically weak for Bitcoin, but this is descriptive, not predictive, in today's ETF-driven market. In conclusion, Bitcoin has shown resilience by absorbing multiple negative forces without a decisive breakdown. However, it has failed to convert improving macro fundamentals into sustained upward momentum. The market awaits key events like the U.S. PCE data, the Jackson Hole symposium, and the September FOMC meeting for a potential catalyst to break the current range.

cryptonews.ru2 min fa

QCP Capital Analysts Explained Why Bitcoin Stalled at $63,000

cryptonews.ru2 min fa

Did DeepSeek Intentionally Make an Unfriendly Agent?

DeepSeek is shifting its strategy from being a low-cost model provider to building a foundational ecosystem for AI agents. This pivot is marked by two recent moves: increasing the price of its flagship V4 Pro model and launching the DeepSeek Harness agent framework. Previously, DeepSeek's success was built on creating powerful, affordable models and open-sourcing them to drive adoption. Now, the focus is moving "beyond the model" to the runtime environment where agents operate. Harness is key to this new approach. Unlike integrated agent products from competitors, Harness deconstructs the agent stack—separating the model, tools, skills, workflows, and UI into modular, replaceable components. Its core innovation is the Cordis kernel, which enables dynamic loading, unloading, and management of plugins, allowing agents to modify their own capabilities during execution. Significantly, Harness does not lock users into DeepSeek's models; it allows integration with third-party models. This suggests DeepSeek's ambition is not to control the model layer but to establish the standard runtime environment for future agents—akin to an operating system for the agent era. The V4 Pro price increase aligns with this shift: the model transitions from a loss-leading acquisition tool to a core revenue engine within a broader ecosystem. Harness is currently complex and developer-focused, prioritizing ecosystem builders over end-users. Its success will be measured not by immediate user numbers, but by the plugins, agents, and platforms built upon it. DeepSeek's long-term bet is that controlling the agent runtime will be more valuable than merely providing the underlying models, potentially redefining how AI agents are created and evolved.

marsbit38 min fa

Did DeepSeek Intentionally Make an Unfriendly Agent?

marsbit38 min fa

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

This monthly market analysis extends its timeline to incorporate critical July comments from the Fed Chair, noting that bond markets have already priced in perceived policy shortcomings. The report observes a growing divergence: equity markets, after some deleveraging, continue a "trust-based" rally, while bond and currency markets signal persistent distrust. Precious metals bottoming suggests a central bank consensus that the era of "competitive currency devaluation" is ending, with verbal interventions losing power. Looking forward to Q3-Q4, the analysis remains bullish on supply-constrained global resources like copper and power, as well as gold, which prices ongoing monetary失信. It argues that digital assets are unlikely to see major outperformance until excess liquidity is released and AI growth rates are fully priced. Key market views include: 1. Commodities like gold remain primary liquidity absorbers over Bitcoin, with recent consolidation seen as healthy. 2. The bull trend for RMB-denominated assets (e.g., STAR 50 Index) is firmly established. 3. Key resource country indices and currencies are near inflection points, with spot copper already at new highs. The report suggests resource equities, particularly in China's market, are at the end of their consolidation phase, offering attractive valuations with embedded optionality on rising metal prices. It highlights the predictive significance of recent US-Japan FX interventions and Treasury-Fed dynamics, suggesting a shift towards less communication and data management to maintain stability. A long position in resource assets is presented as a positive expected-value strategy over a multi-year horizon.

marsbit2 h fa

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

marsbit2 h fa

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

The article discusses the explosive growth and complex nature of prediction markets in the United States, focusing on their value, risks, and regulatory challenges. Key drivers include sports betting, which fueled a 1795% year-over-year trading volume increase in Q2 2026, with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket dominating. These markets offer significant potential as superior hedging tools for businesses and more efficient price discovery mechanisms than traditional polls or derivatives for events like Fed rate decisions, elections, or GPU prices. They also serve as customer acquisition channels for platforms like Robinhood. However, major challenges persist. A central conflict exists between federal regulators (CFTC), which classify event contracts as derivatives under its jurisdiction, and state authorities, which view sports-related contracts as illegal gambling, leading to numerous lawsuits. There is significant consumer protection risk: data shows most retail users lose money to professional traders, platforms market high-risk products like parlays, and protections (e.g., age limits, addiction help) are weaker than in state-regulated sports betting. The "self-certification" process allows rapid contract launches but creates regulatory uncertainty. The author argues prediction markets are fundamentally "better markets" but currently fail to provide adequate consumer safeguards. Proposals include integrating protection mechanisms (cooling-off periods, position limits), aligning risk warnings with product risks, creating paths from speculation to long-term investing, and applying specific consumer protections and taxes to sports contracts. The piece concludes by urging stakeholders to address these issues before a potential regulatory backlash undermines the markets' legitimate utility.

marsbit2 h fa

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片