Crypto PAC Pledges $5M for Barry Moore Senate Run

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-11

Introduzione

A crypto-aligned super PAC, Defend American Jobs, plans to spend $5 million to support Barry Moore’s U.S. Senate campaign. The group, linked to the prominent crypto PAC Fairshake, will run a five-week ad campaign featuring Donald Trump’s endorsement. Fairshake has already spent heavily in the 2024 elections to back pro-crypto candidates. Moore, a House member since 2020, serves on the Agriculture Committee and has supported digital asset innovation. His opponent, Alabama AG Steve Marshall, also holds a supportive crypto rating. With primaries in May, the investment signals crypto policy’s growing role in elections. Super PACs like Fairshake must disclose donors but operate independently from campaigns.

A crypto-aligned super PAC affiliate plans to spend $5 million to support Barry Moore’s U.S. Senate campaign, according to reports. Defend American Jobs, linked to the prominent crypto PAC Fairshake, will launch a five-week advertising campaign featuring former President Donald Trump endorsing Moore. The ads will run on broadcast television and the Fox News Channel, signaling an aggressive push ahead of primary season.

Fairshake has already played a major role in shaping pro-crypto political momentum.The group spent about $130 million in the 2024 elections to support candidates who are friendly toward digital-asset innovation. Industry observers said the newest investment is just the latest signal that crypto policy will be a central campaign issue. Recent reporting on US crypto regulation debates and political crypto funding trends underlines how digital asset companies increasingly join the policy fight.

Super PACs are independent of any candidate. While they solicit money from businesses, associations, and individuals, they cannot directly coordinate with campaigns. However, they finance advertisements and messaging to instruct voters on whether to vote for or against candidates.

Fairshake reportedly described Moore as a leader who will fight for economic growth and help position the United States as a global crypto hub. Moore, first elected to the House in 2020, served on the House Agriculture Committee, which reviewed digital asset legislation last year. He has publicly supported pro-crypto policies and praised efforts to promote innovation in the sector.

Moore’s crypto stance gains attention

Moore has shown an unwavering commitment to promoting blockchain and digital asset growth. Moore mentioned crypto in relation to Alabama’s future during various public speeches. The advocacy group Stand With Crypto has rated Moore as “strongly supportive” based on his voting record and public statements. His Senate opponent, Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, also holds a supportive rating.

A recent survey of 500 Republican voters reported that 26% favored Marshall while 17% supported Moore if the election occurred in February. With primaries scheduled for May and the general election set for Nov. 3, campaign financing could influence voter momentum.

Fairshake disclosed in January that it holds $193 million in cash reserves ahead of the midterms. Industry heavyweights such as Coinbase and Ripple Labs back the PAC. Other crypto firms have also funded Trump-aligned political groups in recent cycles.

According to FEC.gov guidelines, super PACs must disclose donors and expenditures, ensuring transparency in political spending. Election timelines and regulatory frameworks are available on Congress.gov, which indicates that legislative proposals on digital asset markets are constantly evolving.

Crypto’s political footprint expands

The increasing financial profile of the crypto sector in the American political scene is attributed to the sector’s efforts to seek regulatory clarity. There are debates regarding bills on the market structure, stablecoins, and consumer protection.

As midterm campaigns accelerate, political advertising tied to crypto policy may increase. The $5 million pledge for Moore underscores how digital asset advocacy now plays a direct role in Senate races.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Bears Circle SKY: Will Momentum Tip Further to the Downside?

Domande pertinenti

QHow much is the crypto-aligned super PAC Defend American Jobs planning to spend to support Barry Moore's Senate campaign?

A$5 million.

QWhich major crypto companies are reported to be backing the Fairshake PAC?

ACoinbase and Ripple Labs.

QWhat is the primary purpose of a super PAC in relation to a political campaign?

ATo finance advertisements and messaging to instruct voters on whether to vote for or against candidates, without directly coordinating with the campaigns.

QOn which committee did Barry Moore serve, which reviewed digital asset legislation?

AThe House Agriculture Committee.

QWhat was the cash reserve held by Fairshake ahead of the midterms, as disclosed in January?

A$193 million.

Letture associate

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit3 h fa

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit3 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手3 h fa

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手3 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit6 h fa

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit6 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手7 h fa

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手7 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit8 h fa

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit8 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures