Crypto Investors Cheer As South Korea Scraps Punishing Tax Plan

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-20

Introduzione

South Korea's main opposition party, the People Power Party, has proposed a bill to abolish the planned 20% tax on cryptocurrency gains, which was scheduled to take effect in 2027. The tax had been repeatedly delayed due to political debates and concerns over fairness, as it imposed a lower threshold compared to stock gains. The proposal aims to integrate crypto income into a unified financial investment tax framework instead of maintaining a separate regime. While this offers short-term relief for investors, the country continues to advance broader crypto regulations, including user protection laws and AI-powered tracking systems, indicating that a more comprehensive and integrated tax environment may still emerge in the future.

South Korean right-wing lawmakers have proposed a bill to abolish the taxation of crypto assets scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027.

A Long Chain Of Regulation Delays

According to Korean outlet Digital Asset, Korea’s main opposition party the People Power Party is advancing a plan that would effectively abolish the dedicated 20% “crypto tax” by merging virtual‐asset income into a unified financial investment tax framework, instead of enforcing a separate regime just for digital assets.

The proposal comes after multiple postponements. Ruling and opposition parties alternated between promising delays and demanding quick implementation, repeatedly using crypto tax timelines as an election wedge with youth voters. The original 20% tax on gains over roughly ₩2.5 million was pushed from 2022 to 2023, then to 2025, and then again toward 2027 amid political infighting and concerns over investor protection.

The core issue has lays in parity. Crypto gains were set to be taxed at 20% above a very low threshold, while stock gains only paid similar rates above ₩50 million, fueling claims that young, retail‐heavy crypto traders were being unfairly targeted. Song Eon-seok, floor leader of the party and the responsible for introducing the bill, explained:

Given that the financial investment income tax has been abolished for the development of the capital market and the protection of investors, imposing a separate income tax on digital assets raises issues regarding equity and consistency in the tax system.

Kim Han-gyu, senior deputy floor leader for policy of the Democratic Party, responded to the proposal saying that they ruling party will discuss the bill now that it’s been introduced, although “there is no serious discussion or consensus within the party”, local media reported.

South Korea In The Forefront Of Crypto Regulation

South Korea has already rolled out the Virtual Asset User Protection Act and is still fighting over a second‐phase “Virtual Asset Law” covering stablecoins and more comprehensive oversight, underscoring that taxation is only one piece of a much tougher framework.

While many jurisdictions are tightening tax enforcement on digital assets, South Korea is prioritizing regulatory safeguards and market structure first. It’s worth noting, however, that South Korea’s National Tax Service is also moving ahead with a strong AI Crypto Tracking System, as reported by Bitcoinist on March 12.

A more balanced tax design could reduce incentives for Korean traders to move volume offshore or into grey‐area platforms, potentially supporting onshore liquidity and institutional participation. The apparent end of a standalone crypto tax is a short‐term relief, but once the unified financial investment tax kicks in, sophisticated reporting and on‐chain tracing tools mean evasion risks will climb. Active traders should prepare for stricter KYC, better record‐keeping, and the possibility that today’s relief turns into tomorrow’s more robust, integrated tax regime.

At the moment of writing, BTC’s trades for $70k on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason South Korean lawmakers are proposing to abolish the dedicated crypto tax?

AThey aim to address issues of equity and consistency in the tax system by merging virtual-asset income into a unified financial investment tax framework, rather than having a separate regime just for digital assets.

QHow many times has the implementation of South Korea's 20% crypto tax been postponed?

AThe tax has been postponed multiple times, originally from 2022 to 2023, then to 2025, and again to 2027.

QWhat was the key disparity between crypto and stock taxation that fueled claims of unfair targeting?

ACrypto gains were set to be taxed at 20% above a very low threshold (around ₩2.5 million), while stock gains only paid similar rates above a much higher threshold of ₩50 million.

QWhat broader regulatory framework is South Korea implementing alongside the tax discussion?

ASouth Korea has rolled out the Virtual Asset User Protection Act and is developing a second-phase 'Virtual Asset Law' covering stablecoins and more comprehensive oversight.

QWhat potential market impact could a more balanced tax design have according to the article?

AIt could reduce incentives for Korean traders to move volume offshore or into grey-area platforms, potentially supporting onshore liquidity and institutional participation.

Letture associate

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbit4 min fa

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbit4 min fa

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbit19 min fa

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbit19 min fa

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit1 h fa

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit1 h fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbit1 h fa

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbit1 h fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbit1 h fa

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot