Crypto Groups Sue Illinois Authorities Over Digital Assets Tax

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-24Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-24

Introduzione

The Crypto Council for Innovation and the Blockchain Association have filed a lawsuit against the state of Illinois over its newly enacted 0.2% tax on digital assets, set to begin in January 2027. Filed in an Illinois district court, the lawsuit argues the transaction-based tax violates the U.S. Constitution, the state constitution, due process laws, and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act. The groups claim the tax is unconstitutionally vague, forcing residents and brokers to determine which assets are taxable under threat of civil and criminal penalties. They also allege it discriminates against digital commerce, creates a risk of double taxation, and threatens to fragment the national market. This lawsuit follows a similar one from the Digital Chamber of Commerce, highlighting crypto industry groups' pushback against state-level digital asset taxes. Concurrently, prediction markets platform Kalshi is separately suing Illinois over a new state law it says bans sports event contracts and imposes an unconstitutional state-level licensing requirement.

The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) and the Blockchain Association (BA) have filed a lawsuit against Illinois authorities over the introduction of a 0.2% tax on cryptocurrency in the state. The tax is planned to be levied starting in January 2027.

In the lawsuit, filed on Friday in the Sangamon County District Court, which is part of the Seventh Judicial District, lawyers for the two cryptocurrency advocacy organizations challenged Illinois' digital assets tax. They argue that it violates the U.S. Constitution, the state constitution, federal and state due process laws, and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act. In June, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed a law introducing this "privilege tax" as part of the state's budget for the 2027 fiscal year. The law mandates that cryptocurrency users be taxed based on transaction volume, not income.

In the claim alleging a violation of due process rights, CCI and BA stated that the tax is "unconstitutionally vague," as it requires residents and brokers, "under threat of serious civil and criminal penalties," to determine which assets and in what manner are subject to the tax. The organizations also cited the U.S. Constitution and claimed an alleged violation of the Commerce Clause: according to them, the state tax "creates a risk of double taxation."

"States have an important role in fostering innovation, but these powers have constitutional limits," said Blockchain Association CEO and former U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Commissioner Summer Mersinger. "Illinois cannot create a new tax regime that discriminates against digital commerce, creates uncertainty for consumers and businesses, and threatens to fragment a rapidly growing nationwide market."

Source: Blockchain Association

The CCI and BA lawsuit follows a similar one filed by The Digital Chamber in July. The organization stated that the Illinois tax "discriminates against people transacting in digital assets." The lawsuits demonstrate the influence of groups representing digital assets interests opposing laws passed by U.S. state authorities in an election year. Cryptocurrency policies, laws, and regulations can influence voters.

Related: Nigeria Establishes Rules for Collecting Taxes from Crypto Platforms for Digital Assets

Illinois Also Targets Prediction Markets

Opposition to the cryptocurrency tax began against the backdrop of a lawsuit by prediction markets platform Kalshi against Illinois authorities over a law that took effect on July 1. According to the company, the legislation "directly prohibits contracts on sporting events," violating federal law by requiring state-level licensing.

Separately, Pritzker signed an order banning state employees from placing bets on these platforms. The order was signed in April to "prevent insider trading amid the rise of online prediction markets and gambling contracts related to events."

Magazine: Crypto Industry Ties Became a Burden in Illinois Primaries

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason the Crypto Council for Innovation and Blockchain Association are suing the authorities of Illinois?

AThey are suing to challenge the new 0.2% tax on digital assets, arguing it violates the U.S. Constitution, the state constitution, federal and state laws regarding due process, and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act.

QAccording to the lawsuit, what specific constitutional issue does the Illinois digital asset tax create?

AThe lawsuit claims the tax violates the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause because it allegedly "threatens double taxation" and discriminates against digital commerce, risking fragmentation of the national market.

QWhat criticism did the Blockchain Association's CEO, Summer Mersinger, direct at the Illinois tax?

ASummer Mersinger stated that Illinois cannot impose a new tax regime that discriminates against digital commerce, creates uncertainty for consumers and businesses, and threatens to fragment the rapidly growing national market.

QWhen is the 0.2% tax on cryptocurrency transactions in Illinois planned to take effect?

AThe tax is planned to be levied starting from January 2027, as part of the state's budget for the 2027 fiscal year.

QBesides the crypto tax, what other recent Illinois law is facing a legal challenge mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that the prediction market platform Kalshi is suing Illinois over a law that took effect on July 1, which the company says directly bans contracts on sports events by imposing state-level licensing requirements in violation of federal law.

Letture associate

Trading

Spot
活动图片