Crypto funds attract $1.65 billion in three days amid Bitcoin rally

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-28

Introduzione

Global cryptocurrency investment products attracted $1.65 billion in inflows over three days, with nearly $1 billion flowing into Bitcoin, signaling a recovery in institutional demand, according to CoinShares. An additional $478 million went to Ethereum. This marks the second consecutive week of inflows, following a record $2.94 billion the prior week—the highest weekly figure this year. Analysts link the increased demand to uncertainty around U.S. Federal Reserve policy, as investors seek alternative assets amid mixed economic signals. The inflows coincided with Bitcoin's rebound above $78,500, briefly surpassing $81,000 and reclaiming its 200-day moving average for the first time in 270 trading days—a key long-term market indicator. The U.S. dominated demand, accounting for approximately $1.5 billion of the total inflows, with notable contributions from Germany and Switzerland. Total assets under management in crypto investment products now stand around $155 billion, with year-to-date flows turning positive at roughly $3.4 billion. Beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum, investors also allocated funds to altcoins: XRP products saw $80.5 million, Solana $62.9 million, and Hyperliquid $39 million. Analysts note that ETF inflows and declining U.S. Treasury yields are fueling Bitcoin demand following its recent price appreciation.

Global crypto investment products received $1.65 billion in the first three days of the week. Nearly $1 billion was allocated to Bitcoin, serving as an additional signal of recovering demand from institutional investors, according to a CoinShares review.

Investors directed another $478 million into Ethereum.

Thus, inflows have continued for the second consecutive week—crypto funds received $2.94 billion over the entire previous week. This marked the largest weekly figure since the beginning of the year.

Analysts at the company linked the increased demand to uncertainty surrounding U.S. Federal Reserve policy. Amid mixed economic signals, investors continue to seek alternative assets.

Bitcoin returns above 200-day moving average

The inflows coincided with a recovery in Bitcoin. On August 26, the cryptocurrency closed the day around $78,500, and the day before had briefly risen above $81,000.

Furthermore, Bitcoin returned above the 200-day moving average for the first time in 270 trading days. This indicator is often used to assess the long-term direction of the market.

Inflows into investment products themselves guarantee continued growth, noted CoinShares. The capital movement rather indicates that institutional demand for digital assets is strengthening again after recent weakness.

U.S. accounted for the bulk of demand

The main volume of inflows came from U.S. investors: products in the U.S. received about $1.5 billion out of the $1.65 billion. Germany and Switzerland also showed noticeable inflows.

The total assets under management of crypto investment structures reached approximately $155 billion. For the first time since the beginning of the year, industry-wide flows turned positive again, amounting to about $3.4 billion.

In addition to Bitcoin and Ethereum, investors bought positions in altcoins: products based on XRP received $80.5 million, Solana $62.9 million, and Hyperliquid $39 million.

Recall that ETF inflows and declining U.S. Treasury yields are fueling demand for Bitcoin following the recent rally, XWIN Japan concluded.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the CoinShares report, what was the total inflow into global crypto investment products over the first three days of the week?

AGlobal crypto investment products attracted $1.65 billion over the first three days of the week.

QHow much of the weekly $1.65 billion inflow was attributed to Bitcoin and Ethereum specifically?

ANearly $1 billion of the inflow was attributed to Bitcoin, while an additional $478 million went into Ethereum.

QWhat key technical indicator did Bitcoin surpass for the first time in 270 trading days, according to the article?

ABitcoin returned above its 200-day moving average for the first time in 270 trading days.

QWhich country was responsible for the majority of the investor inflows into crypto products mentioned in the report?

AThe United States accounted for the majority of inflows, with products there receiving about $1.5 billion of the total $1.65 billion.

QBesides Bitcoin and Ethereum, which three altcoins saw notable inflows into investment products based on them?

AInvestment products based on XRP received $80.5 million, Solana received $62.9 million, and Hyperliquid received $39 million.

Letture associate

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

In his first Jackson Hole speech, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled a significant shift in monetary policy communication. He declared that "forward guidance," a tool heavily used since the financial crisis, has outlived its usefulness in normal times and should be retired. He cautioned that over-reliance on it can distort market signals and constrain the Fed's flexibility. Instead, Warsh emphasized a return to data-dependence and decision-making discipline. Warsh outlined seven key principles to guide policy: anchoring the 2% inflation target, pursuing the employment mandate, using short-term rates as the primary tool, acknowledging the importance of money, and maintaining purposeful, restrained communication. He stressed that policy should focus on trends, not single data points. On the current economic outlook, Warsh noted that the labor market is consistent with full employment but inflation remains "far above" the Fed's target. He highlighted that over half of the PCE basket's components are still rising above 3% annually. While acknowledging AI's transformative potential for productivity and capital allocation, he admitted its full economic impact remains uncertain and is not a factor in current policy decisions. His core message was a commitment to policy discipline rather than pre-set decisions. Warsh stated the Fed's primary focus must be on restoring price stability, vowing, "We still have work to do," until there is clear evidence inflation is moving decisively toward 2%. He concluded by framing effective monetary policy as crucial for economic prosperity and U.S. global leadership.

Odaily星球日报30 min fa

Wash's Jackson Hole Debut: Bidding Farewell to 'Forward Guidance', Reshaping Fed Discipline Amidst the Squeeze Between AI and Inflation

Odaily星球日报30 min fa

Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh Speaks at Jackson Hole! Here Are the Key Points and Bitcoin's Initial Reaction!

Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh delivered his highly anticipated speech at the Jackson Hole symposium in Wyoming. In his first major address as Chair, he stressed that price stability remains the Fed's top priority. Warsh struck a firm tone, acknowledging that while summer inflation data showed improvement, underlying trends have not changed meaningfully. He stated it is difficult to gauge how restrictive current financial conditions are and emphasized the need to ensure the downward inflation trend approaches the target. Key points from the speech included that the economy remains resilient, with high consumer spending, a stable labor market, and rapidly growing business investment. He noted that a "significant majority" at the July FOMC meeting favored waiting before changing interest rates. Following his remarks, Bitcoin's price dropped. It had been trading around $79,000 before the speech but fell to the $78,000 level afterward.

cryptonews.ru46 min fa

Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh Speaks at Jackson Hole! Here Are the Key Points and Bitcoin's Initial Reaction!

cryptonews.ru46 min fa

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

Blockstream, a major Bitcoin solutions developer, has introduced a draft proposal for a new quantum-resistant digital signature scheme called SHRINCS. The scheme aims to protect Bitcoin transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers while aiming to maintain network throughput. This marks the second technical proposal for Bitcoin quantum defense in recent days, following a similar initiative from StarkWare. A quantum attack on blockchain typically involves deriving a private key from a public one. Currently considered computationally infeasible, quantum algorithms could potentially solve this problem far more efficiently. This threat presents two primary scenarios: an attacker could target addresses where the public key is already exposed, or intercept a transaction before it is confirmed, extract the public key, derive the private key, and replace the transaction. Blockstream's SHRINCS is designed to counter the latter, "in-flight" attack scenario. The SHRINCS signature is built upon the SHA-256 hash function, the same one already used in Bitcoin mining, allowing developers to leverage well-tested, familiar mechanisms. A key design goal was to preserve network capacity. Blockstream estimates Bitcoin could process about three transactions per second using SHRINCS, compared to the current rate of roughly seven, noting that some alternative quantum-resistant schemes could reduce throughput to as low as 0.36 transactions per second. Currently, the security proof for SHRINCS is pending, and the software has not been audited or deemed ready for production. However, Blockstream conducted tests with such transactions on its Liquid sidechain in March. Over the past year, Bitcoin developers have been actively exploring paths to migrate to post-quantum cryptography, a priority across the broader crypto market, underscored by significant investments into securing the leading cryptocurrency.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

American Regulator Files Lawsuits Against Multiple Crypto Services

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against several cryptocurrency services for alleged fraud and document falsification. The regulator accuses Quantum Financial Institute of falsely claiming registration as an investment adviser and promoting a multi-level investment system with promises of bitcoin giveaways and "profitable crypto trading strategies." Services named Pinnacle and THEVGPRO are also accused of making false claims about regulatory approval and registration status. Other defendants include platform RBH Infinity Exchange, which announced three tokens "on the theme of health and intellectual property" that are currently worthless. The SEC charged the platform with violating the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and is seeking administrative fines. The SEC reported difficulties contacting the violators, with many phone numbers disconnected or belonging to other companies, and mailed letters returned. Apexium Securities allegedly claimed to operate from Colorado while using IP addresses from Hong Kong, and the purported office of Web3 University in Colorado Springs was found to be non-existent. This action follows recent SEC proposals for new crypto asset regulations that would allow token issuers to raise funds in the U.S. without full securities registration under certain conditions.

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

American Regulator Files Lawsuits Against Multiple Crypto Services

cryptonews.ru1 h fa

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

When autonomous AI agents behave unpredictably and cause harm, determining legal liability is complex. Currently, there is no specific federal AI agent liability law, so existing legal frameworks are applied. The AI agent itself cannot be held liable, as it is not a legal entity. Liability typically falls on the "developer" (the maker of the AI) or the "deployer" (the user), depending on the facts and circumstances. A negligence analysis under standard tort law may apply. For instance, if a deployer gives a reckless instruction, such as demanding quick money without safety parameters, they could face significant liability, including potential criminal charges under statutes like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The situation is complicated by open-source models, where licenses often disclaim liability, and by the unclear division of responsibility between developers and deployers. An analogy is drawn to self-driving car accidents, where both the manufacturer and the human operator can share fault. In cases of severe harm, such as using AI to create bioweapons, liability for developers depends on jurisdiction; the EU's AI Act imposes responsibilities, while U.S. law offers less clear grounds, similar to platforms being shielded for user-generated content under Section 230. Even if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is achieved, the expert argues against making AGI itself a legally liable entity, as it lacks personhood, assets, or a meaningful way to provide remedy for harm. Instead, accountability should rest with the responsible human or corporate entities behind the technology.

cointelegraph1 h fa

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

cointelegraph1 h fa

Trading

Spot