Crypto Bill Faces a New Challenge, Delaying its Implementation

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-03-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-05

Introduzione

The crypto bill, known as the Clarity Act, faces new challenges that could delay its implementation until at least July 2026. Banks and crypto firms remain opposed, with banks warning of potential deposit flight and risks to financial stability, while crypto companies support the bill for regulatory clarity and the ability to offer yield-bearing products. Despite criticism from former President Trump toward banks, the American Bankers Association has offered suggestions for the bill's advancement. In the Senate, Democrats are seeking additional conditions, including a ban on officials profiting from crypto and stricter anti-money laundering rules. The ongoing conflict in Iran and the approaching 2026 mid-term elections further complicate progress, though some remain optimistic about a potential agreement.

The crypto bill now has a new challenge, not overcoming the same, which could delay its implementation for a longer time. Banks and crypto firms are still on opposite sides despite the intervention of the White House. A maximum stretch has been drawn for July 2026 because months after that could see more focus on the mid-term election.

Challenge for the Crypto Bill

The Clarity Act essentially aims to state regulations for crypto firms more effectively; however, banks have penned a line to obstruct its implementation. Banks have flagged a possibility of deposit flight. This could affect their lending capacity, which is then expected to impact the macro economic condition of the nation.

US President Donald Trump has criticized banks by saying that they were trying to undermine the bill. Trump, in a social media post, called it a powerful crypto agenda and said that they would not allow banks to undermine it.

The American Bankers Association has sought a precautionary move to prevent deterrence to economic growth and financial stability. It has, reportedly, offered constructive suggestions for the advancement of the bill.

Support from Crypto Giants

Needless to say, crypto giants are in support of the crypto bill for two reasons. They have operated in gray areas for a long time, and they are still on the lookout to reward/recruit users in their ecosystem. The Clarity Bill underlines regulations that could help promote adoption of cryptocurrencies.

Another reason is that it enables crypto firms to extend yield-bearing products to users. Companies have reportedly spent approximately $119 million to support pro-crypto candidates in 2024, and are hoping to get a favorable result by July 2026.

Challenges in the Senate

Democrats have sought additional conditions before giving a green light. The crypto bill has to be supported by a minimum of seven democrats. The group has asked for a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules.

The ongoing conflict in Iran is also making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill, according to a statement by Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel.

Many anticipate that no discussion or no progress by July 2026 could delay the bill for a long time, as discussions would then shift to the mid-term election, which is scheduled to happen in November 2026.

Nevertheless, Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger has signalled that the path to a workable agreement is clearer than it was before.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

From Bear Trap to Breakout? Ethereum (ETH) Tests a Crucial Momentum Shift After a 7% Jump

TagsCrypto Bill

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason for the potential delay in the implementation of the crypto bill?

AThe main reason for the potential delay is a new challenge that the bill is facing, with banks and crypto firms remaining on opposite sides despite White House intervention. Furthermore, the focus is expected to shift to the mid-term elections after July 2026, which could postpone the bill for a longer time.

QWhy are banks opposing the Clarity Act for crypto regulations?

ABanks are opposing the Clarity Act because they have flagged the possibility of deposit flight, which could affect their lending capacity and subsequently impact the nation's macroeconomic condition.

QHow have crypto giants shown their support for the crypto bill?

ACrypto giants support the bill because it provides regulatory clarity after they have operated in gray areas for a long time, and it enables them to extend yield-bearing products to users. They have also spent approximately $119 million in 2024 to support pro-crypto candidates.

QWhat additional conditions have Democrats requested before supporting the crypto bill?

ADemocrats have requested a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules before giving their support to the bill.

QAccording to the article, what external event is making it difficult to discuss the crypto bill?

AAccording to Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel, the ongoing conflict in Iran is making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill.

Letture associate

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

AI Is Eliminating 'Entertainment for the Poor' This article discusses the rising cost of video gaming, arguing that AI is making digital entertainment increasingly expensive. It follows the example of a frugal gamer who, accustomed to waiting for discounts and buying second-hand games, now faces a new reality. Video game consoles like the PS5 Pro and Switch 2 are increasing in price post-launch, breaking the traditional pattern of降价 over time. Game prices are also rising, with major titles like GTA 6 launching at $80. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards eliminating physical media, exemplified by Sony's plan to stop PS disc production by 2028. This shift blocks the二手 market, a key cost-saving avenue for players. Even Valve's anticipated affordable Steam Machine launched with a high price and disappointing specs. Manufacturers cite inflation, supply chain issues, and rising development costs, but a core driver is the AI boom. AI data centers now consume semiconductor and memory resources once prioritized for consumer electronics like game consoles. This competition from a more profitable sector drives up hardware costs. Additionally, developing modern AAA games with massive teams over many years is astronomically expensive, pushing publishers towards digital-only distribution and subscription models to secure recurring revenue. The article suggests this trend extends beyond gaming. Video streaming, music platforms, cloud storage, and AI tools are increasingly locked behind complex subscription tiers. While AI promises future benefits, it is currently making digital entertainment and services more costly. The era of progressively cheaper, accessible online entertainment is ending, forcing consumers to pay more upfront for future technological promises.

marsbit28 min fa

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

marsbit28 min fa

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

South Korea's AI-driven bull market has taken a sharp downturn, severely impacting SK Hynix's stock and prompting regulatory tightening in both Hong Kong and South Korea on single-stock leveraged products. The CSOP SK Hynix Daily Leveraged (2x) ETF, once the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF with over HKD 130 billion in assets, saw its value plummet by over 80% as SK Hynix shares fell nearly 46% from their June peak, erasing more than HKD 100 billion. In response, Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) revised its regulatory framework. Starting August 3rd, fixed 2x leverage for single-stock leveraged and inverse products will shift to a dynamic "flexible leverage" mechanism, where daily leverage can vary up to a maximum of 2x. This aims to balance market development with investor protection but has sparked debate about changes to the products' core features and potential reduced appeal for risk-seeking investors. Simultaneously, South Korean authorities announced plans to further restrict single-stock leveraged ETFs following two consecutive days of market circuit breakers. Proposed measures include capping individual investors' allocations to such products at 20% of their total financial investment assets, increasing trading costs, and enhancing suitability requirements. The Finance Minister publicly apologized, acknowledging insufficient initial risk assessment. Analysts note that while the long-term fundamentals for South Korean semiconductor firms like SK Hynix remain solid, short-term market volatility is heightened due to concentrated leveraged bets and shifting global risk sentiment. The regulatory moves in both markets signal a clear shift from encouraging innovation towards prioritizing risk control, reminding investors of the amplified risks inherent in leveraged products.

marsbit33 min fa

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

marsbit33 min fa

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

"The Privatization of Human Civilization" The article critiques how AI companies like Anthropic are systematically acquiring and digitizing millions of books—sometimes by destroying physical copies—to build proprietary training datasets for models like Claude. While a lawsuit resulted in a settlement, the author argues the deeper issue transcends copyright: it is about the privatization and centralized control of human knowledge and civilization. This process coincides with a powerful Silicon Valley ideology, exemplified by Marc Andreessen's "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" and movements like e/acc (Effective Accelerationism). This worldview frames technological growth and speed as inherently moral, portraying caution, regulation, and public dissent as obstacles to progress. It often envisions intelligence itself, rather than human well-being, as the ultimate goal, potentially sidelining present human concerns. Figures like Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin express skepticism towards democratic processes as too slow, suggesting more centralized, founder-led governance is efficient. This logic extends to AI, where a small team within a company defines the model's "constitution"—its rules, values, and definitions of truth and safety—effectively governing how millions understand the world. Thus, the scanned books symbolize a new form of control. Knowledge isn't erased but is ingested into private, opaque systems. The original, decentralized, and contestable nature of books and public knowledge is replaced by a curated, company-controlled output. The public's access to their own cultural heritage becomes mediated by corporate AI, which remembers civilization only in the form its creators dictate. This is not book-burning but a subtler, potentially more complete privatization of human memory and understanding.

marsbit43 min fa

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

marsbit43 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片