Crypto Bets On Argentina Inflation Stoke Fears Of Insider Trading On Polymarket

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-03-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-17

Introduzione

Argentinian authorities have ordered a nationwide blockade of the crypto prediction platform Polymarket, enforced by regulators and internet providers, following a court ruling that deemed it an unlicensed gambling operation. The move comes after allegations of insider trading emerged when suspicious betting activity occurred just before the release of official inflation data in February. Argentina follows Colombia as the second Latin American country to ban the platform, reflecting a broader global trend of regulators treating prediction markets as gambling rather than financial tools. This could fragment liquidity and push users into less regulated markets.

Argentinian authorities have ordered a full national blockade of Polymarket after it predicted inflation data.

An Authoritarian Crypto Ban?

Argentinian outlets reported this Monday that a court ruling in Buenos Aires ordered a nationwide blockade of Polymarket, one of the largest crypto prediction market platforms globally. The blockade will be enforced via the Ente Nacional de Comunicaciones (ENACOM) and local internet service providers (ISPs), in addition to its removal from Apple and Google app stores. The restriction goes as far as affecting already signed up Polymarket users, another local outlet claims.

Buenos Aires Lottery Regulators (Lotería de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires and the Cámara Argentina de Casinos y Bingos) argue that Polymarket is operating as an unlicensed online gambling platform, not just a neutral "prediction market". This led to a case being brought by the City's Special Prosecutor's Office for Gambling (FEJA) and presided over by Judge Susana Parada.

The Public Prosecutor's Office explained that despite the blocking order having already been issued, the implementation depends on ENACOM notifying all ISP's so the companies can cut off access. Therefore, the full and final implementation will most likely be gradual.

A "Degen Casino" That Played With The Country's Inflation

This drastic ruling follows a suspicious trading scandal in the inflation market back in February, where odds moved around fifteen minutes before INDEC released official CPI data, raising allegations of insider trading by politically connected actors.

The local media has echoed the "degen casino" narrative, arguing that these markets let users place peso‐linked wagers on macro data, elections and high‐profile political outcomes without any Argentine license or KYC/age checks. Clarín claims that, in Polymarket, "it all comes down to betting money on a question that can be answered with a yes or a no":

Polymarket presents itself as a prediction market, but in practice it's a way to bet on almost anything that emerged during the pandemic and gained popularity during the election campaign between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, when the tycoon began promoting these markets because they gave him better results than the polls: 55.5% were literally betting on him.

A Global Trend

Despite some claims that place Argentina as the first country in the region to implement such measures, the truth is that last year Colombia became the first country in Latin America to ban Polymarket. Coljuegos, Colombian gambling regulators, declared the platform ilegal in September 2025 and, similarly to the Argentinian ban, instructed their ISPs to block access to it.

It its worth noting that prediction markets had become a popular way for global crypto traders to price political risk, inflation paths and macro events in real time, often anticipating official data. In line with this, this is not the first clash between Polymarket's and regulatory entities. Besides Colombia, other earlier blocks or investigations have been registered in France, Taiwan and Singapore, in addition to the US regulatory pressure over unregistered derivatives and gambling concerns.

Argentina's move reinforces a growing trend of regulators increasingly treating crypto prediction platforms as gambling first and market infrastructure second, which could fragment liquidity and push activity into friendlier jurisdictions or darker venues.

BTC's price trends reaches $74K on the daily chart, the highest since January. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Domande pertinenti

QWhy did Argentinian authorities order a national blockade of Polymarket?

AArgentinian authorities ordered a national blockade of Polymarket because they argue it is an unlicensed online gambling platform, not just a neutral prediction market, following a suspicious trading scandal involving inflation data.

QWhat was the suspicious trading activity on Polymarket related to in Argentina?

AThe suspicious trading activity was related to Argentina's inflation data, where odds moved around fifteen minutes before the official CPI data was released by INDEC, raising allegations of insider trading.

QWhich other Latin American country banned Polymarket before Argentina?

AColombia became the first country in Latin America to ban Polymarket, declaring the platform illegal in September 2025 and instructing ISPs to block access.

QHow does Polymarket present itself versus how it is viewed by regulators?

APolymarket presents itself as a prediction market, but regulators view it as an unlicensed online gambling platform that allows users to place wagers on events without proper licensing or KYC/age checks.

QWhat global trend does Argentina's move against Polymarket reinforce?

AArgentina's move reinforces a growing trend of regulators treating crypto prediction platforms as gambling first and market infrastructure second, which could fragment liquidity and push activity into friendlier jurisdictions.

Letture associate

Weekly Token Unlocks: PYTH Unlocks Tokens Up to 37% of Circulating Supply

This week's major token unlocks feature three notable projects, each releasing a significant number of tokens into circulation. **Pyth Network** is set for the largest unlock, releasing 2.12 billion PYTH tokens valued at approximately $95.24 million. This amount represents a substantial portion of its circulating supply. Pyth is a decentralized oracle network providing real-time financial market data for DeFi applications. **LayerZero** will unlock 25.71 million ZRO tokens, worth around $32.91 million. LayerZero is a full-chain interoperability protocol designed for secure and configurable cross-chain messaging. **Kaito** will release 17.6 million KAI tokens, with an estimated value of $7.78 million. Kaito is an AI-driven platform that aggregates and analyzes fragmented Web3 information from various sources like social media and governance forums. Each project section includes links to their official Twitter and website, along with a chart depicting their specific token release schedule.

marsbit1 h fa

Weekly Token Unlocks: PYTH Unlocks Tokens Up to 37% of Circulating Supply

marsbit1 h fa

Vitalik: We Shouldn't Oppose AI, But Create Sanctuaries

Summary: In a podcast, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin discusses the human response to advancing AI. He argues the core risk isn't AI's intelligence, but humanity's passive reliance on centralized systems and AI, which erodes privacy and personal agency. His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies"—tools like Ethereum that offer safe, optional spaces where individuals can retain sovereignty and freedom of choice without being forced into a single system. Buterin reflects on his shift from an "autopilot" mode in his youth to actively "piloting" his life and work. He stresses the importance of maintaining "manual mode" activities—like learning actively and performing tasks without AI assistance—to prevent mental atrophy and preserve independent thought. For builders, his advice is to prioritize technologies that protect human agency, avoid outsourcing all strategic thinking, and actively engage in serendipitous, real-world interactions. He repositions Ethereum/crypto not as a fix for legacy systems like the dollar, but as a parallel, voluntary option. In an era of increasing centralization, the freedom to opt-in or opt-out becomes invaluable. The key takeaway is that the AI era demands greater human proactivity; the scarcest resource will remain actively thinking, sovereign individuals.

marsbit1 h fa

Vitalik: We Shouldn't Oppose AI, But Create Sanctuaries

marsbit1 h fa

Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

In a recent interview, Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, addresses the central anxiety of the AI era. He argues the primary risk isn't AI's intelligence, but human passivity—ceding decisions, privacy, and agency to centralized systems or "super AIs" for a sense of "disempowering safety." His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies." These are optional, non-totalizing spaces that protect users while preserving their sovereignty and privacy. Ethereum is presented as a prime example, offering a parallel financial system one can freely choose, not a fix for the old one. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik notes the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years. To keep up, individuals must actively pilot their lives, not be passive passengers. He stresses that active learning vastly outperforms passive learning, even with equal time invested. His practical advice for builders and individuals in the AI age includes: periodically forcing oneself to do tasks manually to keep the mind engaged; prioritizing active learning and verification over outsourcing answers; building tools that help retain human agency; not outsourcing all strategic thinking to AI; and preserving serendipity through real-world interactions. Ultimately, Buterin redefines Ethereum/crypto's role: not to win against or fix the old world, but to provide a free, optional alternative. The core message is that as AI grows more powerful, the truly scarce resource will be proactive humans who retain their sovereignty, privacy, and capacity for independent thought. The era demands not less tool use, but more intentional and active use of technology.

链捕手1 h fa

Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

链捕手1 h fa

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

**Summary: Inside Anthropic's Massive, Opaque Secondary Market** In a revealing interview, Patagon founder Dio Casares pulls back the curtain on the booming, high-risk secondary market for shares in companies like Anthropic. This private market, fueled by companies staying private longer and massive funding rounds, is estimated to involve hundreds of billions of dollars. Casares distinguishes between two types of "secondary" trading: 1. **Company-approved SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) sales:** Where new capital flows into the company, often facilitated by select private equity firms. Anthropic supports this to manage liquidity and pre-IPO selling pressure. 2. **The "gray" market:** Platforms like Hive and Forge that match buyers and sellers, often creating pricing confusion and competing with official funding rounds. These intermediaries are widely disliked by companies. The market structure is complex and fragmented, relying heavily on personal connections. Brokers connect buyers and sellers, often layering multiple SPVs to pool capital, with single transaction fees as high as 10%. Strikingly, some finance professionals earn more from this trading than from their primary investment roles. **Key risks highlighted include:** * **High Fraud Rates:** An estimated 10-20% of transactions involve fake stock certificates or sellers who take payment without having the shares. * **Complex, Risky Structures:** Nested SPVs, "forward contracts" on employee equity, and tokenized private equity create layers of opacity. This is exemplified by a recent incident where an xAI employee's shares were revoked after an espionage allegation, leaving buyers empty-handed. * **Post-IPO "Settlement Hell":** After an IPO, delays in distributing shares through multiple SPV layers and decisions by fund managers to hold onto shares could trigger years of lawsuits as downstream investors are locked out. **For small investors** holding positions through tokenized vehicles or layered SPVs, it's often impossible to verify the underlying asset. Casares advises caution: if the investment feels wrong, consider exiting. As the private market now surpasses IPO fundraising, this "wild west" ecosystem faces a looming reckoning. While it will likely professionalize, the post-IPO period for a company like Anthropic could unleash a wave of disputes, exposing the vulnerabilities built into this frenzied, largely unregulated marketplace.

marsbit3 h fa

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

marsbit3 h fa

Why Ripple’s XRP Is A Better Transaction Choice Compared To SWIFT

Crypto expert CharuSan argues that Ripple's XRP is superior to SWIFT for cross-border transactions, predicting SWIFT may need to integrate XRP to survive. He highlights XRP's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) technology as faster and cheaper, freeing up trillions for banks instantly, while SWIFT is described as cumbersome and slow. CharuSan states that banks' main software is already integrated with Ripple, enabling rapid, widespread adoption. He believes SWIFT must adopt XRP as a liquidity layer to remain relevant, rather than staying a simple messaging service. While SWIFT is developing a distributed ledger on Ethereum's Linea with partners, CharuSan dismisses this move, noting Linea handles messaging trials but isn't a liquidity solution and incurs verification costs on Ethereum, making it non-viable for payments. In conclusion, CharuSan asserts that without integrating XRP, SWIFT is "doomed" to fade away. At the time of writing, XRP price was around $1.41.

bitcoinist5 h fa

Why Ripple’s XRP Is A Better Transaction Choice Compared To SWIFT

bitcoinist5 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片