Cooling US inflation catches crypto bears off guard as short liquidations reach $179M

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-07-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-14

Introduzione

Cooling U.S. inflation data triggered a broad market rally, leading to $219.77 million in cryptocurrency liquidations over 12 hours. Bearish traders were caught off guard, with short positions accounting for $179.26 million (over 80%) of the total. Ethereum saw the largest liquidations at $98.73 million, followed by Bitcoin at $59.59 million. The softer Consumer Price Index report for June boosted risk appetite, as investors bet on potential Federal Reserve policy easing, forcing many who positioned for lower prices to unwind their trades.

Cooling U.S. inflation triggered a broad risk-on move across financial markets on Tuesday, helping fuel a wave of crypto short liquidations as traders reacted to growing expectations that the Federal Reserve may have greater scope to ease monetary policy if inflation continues to moderate.

Over the past 12 hours, nearly $220 million in crypto positions were liquidated, with bearish traders accounting for more than 80% of the losses, according to CoinGlass data.

Crypto shorts bear the brunt of market rally

CoinGlass data showed total liquidations reached $219.77 million over the past 12 hours. This includes $179.26 million in short positions and $40.51 million in longs.

Ethereum recorded the largest liquidations at $98.73 million, followed by Bitcoin at $59.59 million, as both assets rallied after the inflation data.

Over the previous hour alone, short liquidations totalled $56.05 million, compared with $7.18 million in long liquidations, highlighting the extent of the squeeze.

The figures suggest that many traders who had positioned for lower prices were forced to close their positions as crypto markets moved higher following the macroeconomic release.

Softer CPI boosts appetite for risk assets

The move came after the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the Consumer Price Index [CPI] fell 0.4% in June. This marked the largest monthly decline since April 2020.

Annual inflation slowed to 3.5%, while core inflation remained unchanged on a monthly basis and eased to 2.6% year over year.

The softer inflation reading weighed on the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields while supporting risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin traded higher following the release as investors interpreted the report as a sign that inflationary pressures may be easing, potentially giving the Federal Reserve greater flexibility over future interest rate decisions.

Although the 12-hour liquidation figures include activity before the CPI release, the dominance of short liquidations suggests the inflation report accelerated the upward move and forced bearish traders to unwind positions.

Ethereum leads short liquidation wave

Ethereum accounted for nearly half of all crypto liquidations during the period, exceeding Bitcoin despite the latter’s larger market capitalisation.

That may reflect stronger price momentum in ETH or heavier leveraged positioning ahead of the CPI release.

While Bitcoin also experienced substantial liquidations, ETH’s larger share highlights how macroeconomic events can have an outsized impact on leveraged positions across the broader crypto market.


Final Summary

  • Crypto markets saw $219.77 million in liquidations over 12 hours, with short positions accounting for $179.26 million as traders reacted to cooling U.S. inflation.
  • The softer CPI report boosted risk appetite, lifting Bitcoin and Ethereum, while triggering a wave of short liquidations led by Ethereum.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the key macroeconomic event that triggered the surge in crypto short liquidations?

AThe key event was the release of the softer U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) report for June, which showed inflation cooling.

QAccording to CoinGlass data, what was the total value of crypto positions liquidated in the past 12 hours, and how much of that came from short positions?

AThe total value liquidated was $219.77 million, with short positions accounting for $179.26 million of that total.

QWhich cryptocurrency recorded the largest single liquidation amount during this period?

AEthereum (ETH) recorded the largest liquidation amount at $98.73 million.

QHow did the market reaction to the CPI report affect assets like the U.S. dollar, Treasury yields, and cryptocurrencies?

AThe softer inflation report weighed on the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields, while it supported risk assets, including cryptocurrencies, leading to price rallies.

QWhat does the dominance of short liquidations following the CPI release suggest about trader positioning and market movement?

AIt suggests that many traders had positioned for lower prices (were bearish) and were forced to close their positions as the market moved higher, accelerating the upward price move.

Letture associate

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News10 min fa

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News10 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit27 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit27 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手39 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手39 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit54 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit54 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare MOVE

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Movement (MOVE) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente MovementMOVE.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Movement (MOVE)Dopo aver acquistato Movement (MOVE), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Movement (MOVE)Scambia facilmente Movement (MOVE) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

290 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.13Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare MOVE

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di MOVE MOVE sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片