Community is Dead, Long Live Community

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-15

Introduzione

The author, James Richard Fry, laments the degradation of the Web3/crypto community, contrasting its past vitality with its current state. He fondly recalls early days of genuine connection and shared belief on platforms like Clubhouse and Discord, where communities formed around common interests like DeFi and NFTs, fueled by deep conviction and a spirit of building together. He argues that today, the term "community" has been co-opted by "extractors." Most modern Discord communities, he asserts, are filled with members driven solely by the prospect of financial gain from airdrops, leading to artificial engagement that vanishes post-Token Generation Event (TGE), often replaced by hostility. This extractive behavior, he states, has poisoned the ecosystem, creating cheap imitations of the early, belief-driven communities. Using his project, Across Protocol, as an example, he notes its own Discord has succumbed to this dynamic, pushing away genuine supporters. Consequently, he announces the decision to transition the Across Discord to read-only mode as a first step toward shutting it down completely. He concludes with a bittersweet farewell to the platform that once hosted beautiful moments, declaring "The community is dead. Long live the community."

Author:jamesrichardfry, Head of Marketing at Across Protocol

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

I've been struggling with how to start writing this. Part of me wants to paint everything in a sunny light. Dress it up with marketing talk, make it sound grand, and move on.

But that wouldn't be entirely honest. If you know me, you know I wear my heart on my sleeve and can't hold things in. So, I'll just say it straight.

Community is dead. Of course, it wasn't always like this. That goes without saying, but I'm going to say it out loud anyway.

I still miss the good old days on Clubhouse and Discord channels. When we spent hours 'vibing' with strangers online, talking about magic internet money, the latest NFT drop, the best staking opportunities, commiserating over our fails and losses, dreaming together about the next great project, and actually 'building'.

To this day, many of those online strangers are still great friends. Some even became close friends in real life. When community is good, it's truly good. I miss those days.

Zooming out a bit, what exactly is community? In our last all-hands meeting, I rambled on about this for so long I could almost hear my colleagues' eyes rolling.

To share a bit of that with you, here's what I think community is:

Community is a group of people gathered around a common interest. We all have communities in many aspects of our daily lives.

From the school you attended, the sport you played, the religion you follow, the gym you go to, even the grocery store you shop at, communities exist.

Some communities are more shallow. The group of old men I see at the gym Monday to Friday is a community, but it's obviously very different from the friend circle we deliberately spend time with.

Web3 or crypto communities are no different.

We all gather around shared interests. DeFi Summer. NFT Mania. NFT Winter. Every kind of cross-chain interoperability, every ZK proof.

Whatever flavor you're into, there's a group of people going down that rabbit hole with you.

Some are here for financial speculation. Some are here from a deep conviction and commitment to the early cypherpunk movement. Some crypto communities are more superficial or performative.

Others are deep. I mean, really deep. Like religious groups, cultish followings, conviction that sits deep in your gut, put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is deep.

We wear the same 'uniform' (PFP), speak our own language (WAGMI), look absolutely insane to outsiders, and we don't care at all because we believe in what we've gathered around.

Early crypto community was inseparable from conviction.

Not just belief, but deep conviction burning in your gut that gives you the courage to get on stage and talk for hours in front of hundreds of listeners about why you believe in the founder, the project, the roadmap, and why you are the diamond-handed hodler of that project.

Conviction. That's what drove parabolic growth in the early days. Without community, crypto wouldn't be what it is today.

By the way, Across is no exception. Across' early community was a golden era. Vibes were high. Deep conviction existed (yes, I used that word a lot). Excitement and energy, people caring about the project for its innovation, not token price.

We hired many people from the community who still work with us today. There are also those from the early days who are still die-hard community members, sticking with us through thick and thin.

When community is good, it's truly good.

But then, it changed.

Fast forward to today. I'm going to make some broad generalizations now. Please know, I don't mean 'all' community members, 'every' community group, and I'm not painting with a broad brush. But if I'm continuing my blunt style, I do mean most. The overwhelming majority.

The word 'community' has been ruined by the extractors of crypto. In many ways, if you want to know why 'the love of money is the root of all evil', look no further than the endless Discord 'communities'.

Thousands of unread messages per day, staggering daily active users, endless social support, until the Token Generation Event (TGE) arrives. We all know how the script goes.

The pre-TGE vibes mimic the sentiment of early crypto communities. Deep conviction. Fire in the gut. Courage to get on stage. Project profile pictures and tags in bios. Ride or die, diamond-handed, conviction-filled hodlers.

Then, everyone changes.

One night you go to bed, barely able to keep up with Discord notifications.

You wake up the next morning, and it's a ghost town.

Or worse.

You find your loyal 'community' coming at you with pitchforks and torches.

Because of the airdrop.

You see, 'community' is no longer community.

It has devolved into endless AI-generated spam for points, for hope of an airdrop, to immediately dump, then complain about token price, and call the project a scam or rug (to be fair, often also true).

I don't need to finish that long-winded sentence, you know what I mean, right?

'Community' is not community. You all know it, you feel it. The timeline feels off. Discord servers feel off. Podcasts feel off. Twitter Spaces feel off.

It's all wrong, like 'Kangshuaifu' will never be Master Kang. Everyone reading this today knows it in their heart, even if you've never articulated it this clearly before.

Today's 'communities' are just cheap imitations of the early communities that built crypto into what it is today. The common interest of these 'community' members boils down to one thing. Extraction. Quick. Decisive. Extraction. That's the poison that killed what crypto could have and should have been.

Most (again, not all) Discord 'communities' today are made up of a mixed bag of remnants.

Some are truly loyal followers and believers. (To those who still support Across, we wouldn't be here without you. Thank you. You know where to find us, and there will always be a place for you.)

Some, often the majority, are here to extract from the project. I won't belabor the point.

And finally, some only appear to complain. Because in every bear market, these specific types of 'community' members come out to kick you while you're down, as if the bear market has zero impact on each team member, as if we caused it.

Unfortunately, the Across Discord has recently fallen into that 'majority' category. Our 'community' has become unrecognizable.

Those who recognize our incredible achievements, the progress Across has pioneered for the entire industry, and still support us, are also tired of being part of this extractive 'community' and have left Discord.

The few who remain would happily follow us to Twitter and other channels. What's left are the so-called 'communities' I defined above. Yes, I say this with fire in my gut and deep conviction.

Therefore, today, the Across Discord will go read-only.

This is the first step in our plan to shut down the server entirely.

To the community of believers who remain, let's keep building. We have so much more work to do.

To Discord, thank you for hosting some of the good old days of crypto. I'll always cherish it.

Community is dead.

Long live community.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main argument or thesis of the article titled 'The Community is Dead, Long Live the Community'?

AThe article argues that the true spirit of early crypto communities—built on deep belief, shared passion, and genuine collaboration—has been largely destroyed and replaced by a culture of extraction, where most participants are only interested in quick profits from airdrops and token launches, leading to empty, toxic, and transactional online spaces.

QAccording to the author, what characterized the early, authentic crypto communities?

AAccording to the author, early authentic crypto communities were characterized by deep belief (conviction), genuine passion for the technology (like DeFi, NFTs), meaningful connections that turned into real friendships, a sense of shared purpose in 'building' the next big thing, and a culture that wasn't primarily focused on token price.

QWhat specific action is the author announcing regarding the Across Protocol Discord server, and why?

AThe author announces that the Across Protocol Discord server will be set to 'read-only' mode as the first step towards its planned full shutdown. The reason is that the server has degraded into a space dominated by extractive individuals seeking airdrops and complaining, which has driven away the genuine believers and no longer represents a true community.

QWhat does the author mean by stating that today's 'communities' are often just 'extractors'?

AThe author means that the majority of participants in current crypto project 'communities' are not there out of belief or to contribute. Their sole common interest is to 'extract' value—primarily by farming points for a potential airdrop, selling the token immediately upon launch, and then often turning hostile by labeling the project a scam if the price falls.

QHow does the title 'The Community is Dead, Long Live the Community' reflect the article's dual perspective?

AThe title reflects the dual perspective by mourning the death of the original, idealistic form of crypto community ('The Community is Dead') while simultaneously expressing hope and a call to continue for the small remnant of genuine believers who still embody that original spirit ('Long Live the Community').

Letture associate

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbit15 min fa

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbit15 min fa

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

"Standing in the Light: Understanding the Optical Module and CPO Industry Chain" This article analyzes the critical role of optical communication technology, specifically optical modules and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO), as the "nervous system" for modern AI data centers. With exponential growth in AI computational demands (e.g., NVIDIA's Vera Rubin architecture), traditional electrical interconnects using copper cables face severe bottlenecks in bandwidth, power consumption, and signal integrity over distance. The core function of an optical module is to act as a "translator," converting electrical signals from chips into optical signals for transmission over fiber (and vice-versa). Key internal components include lasers, modulators, photodetectors, drivers, and DSP chips. The industry is currently transitioning from 800G to 1.6T modules. However, the future lies in CPO. This next-generation technology integrates the optical engine directly with the switch ASIC/XPU on the same package substrate, drastically reducing power consumption (by ~3.5x according to NVIDIA), overcoming bandwidth density limits, and minimizing signal attenuation compared to traditional pluggable modules. Key challenges for CPO include advanced packaging capacity (dominated by TSMC), thermal management, repairability, and standardization. The article details the broader technology landscape, including Near-Packaged Optics (NPO, a pragmatic intermediate step), Linear-drive Pluggable Optics (LPO), Optical I/O (OIO for chip-level integration), and Optical Circuit Switches (OCS). A comprehensive CPO industry chain is mapped, highlighting shifting power dynamics: * **Architecture Definers:** NVIDIA, Broadcom, and Marvell now hold greater influence. * **Advanced Packaging & Manufacturing:** TSMC is central; Fabrinet is a key EMS player. * **Lasers ("The Heart"):** A strategic bottleneck. EML lasers are led by Lumentum and Coherent (both receiving major NVIDIA investments). CW lasers, favored for CPO/silicon photonics, see strong Chinese players like Source Photonics and Sicoya. * **Silicon Photonics Chips:** The mainstream path for CPO engines, with key players like Broadcom, Intel, Marvell, and China's Accelink. * **Fiber Connectivity Components:** A major new, high-growth market created by CPO, including Fiber Array Units (FAU), Polarization-Maintaining Fiber (PMF), and MPO connectors. Companies like Tianfu Communication and US Conec are leaders. * **Fiber & Cable:** Experiencing a super-cycle (e.g., Corning, Yangtze Optical Fiber). * **PCB/Substrates:** Requiring advanced materials (e.g., Shengyi Tech). * **DSP & SerDes:** Functions are integrated into switch ASICs in the CPO era (e.g., Broadcom, Astera Labs). * **Optical Module Makers:** Transitioning from standalone module suppliers to providers of optical engines and NPO/LPO solutions while riding the current pluggable boom (e.g., Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink). The investment timeline is segmented: Short-term (2026-2027) features the "last feast" for pluggable modules and CPO's initial rollout. Medium-term (2027-2029) will see CPO expand and NPO peak. Long-term (2029-2032+) involves CPO/OIO penetration into intra-rack scaling. In conclusion, optical interconnects are fundamental to AI infrastructure. The competitive landscape sees US firms leading in architecture and high-end chips, TSMC in advanced packaging, and Chinese firms holding strong positions in modules, connectivity components, CW lasers, and fiber/cable. The future belongs to companies that can navigate the technological shift from "selling shovels" (modules) to "building highways" (CPO/OIO infrastructure).

marsbit25 min fa

Standing in the Light: A Comprehensive Guide to the Optical Module and CPO Supply Chain

marsbit25 min fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片