Community is Dead, Long Live Community

链捕手Pubblicato 2026-05-15Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-15

Introduzione

The author reflects on the transformative and often painful evolution of crypto communities. They nostalgically recall the early days of Web3, where genuine bonds formed around shared beliefs in projects like DeFi and NFTs, leading to deep friendships and passionate collaboration. However, the essay argues this authentic "community" is now largely dead. It has been corrupted by a culture of extraction, where most participants in modern Discord servers are motivated solely by financial gain—grinding for points, chasing airdrops, and immediately selling tokens. This dynamic creates a facade of engagement that vanishes after a token launch, often replaced by hostility. The author uses their project, Across Protocol, as a case study, announcing the shutdown of its Discord server because it no longer represents a true community but a toxic space dominated by mercenary actors. The piece concludes with a bittersweet farewell to the old era and a determined call to continue building with the few remaining genuine believers. The title's paradox, "Community is dead. Long live community," mourns the loss of the original ideal while expressing hope for its future revival.

Author: jamesrichardfry, Head of Marketing, Across Protocol

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

I've been struggling with how to write this. Part of me wants to sugarcoat it. Dress it up in marketing speak. Frame it as something beautiful and move on.

But that wouldn't be entirely honest. If you know me, you know I wear my heart on my sleeve and I'm incapable of lying. So here it is, bluntly.

Community is dead. Of course, it wasn't always this way. That goes without saying, but I'm saying it out loud anyway.

I still miss the good old days on Clubhouse and Discord chatrooms. The times we spent hours "vibing" with people from across the internet about magic internet money, the latest NFT drop, the best staking opportunities, complaining about the money we lost, dreaming about the next great project, and actually *building*.

To this day, I'm still good friends with many of those people. Some have even become friends in real life. When community is good, it's good. I miss those days.

Zooming out a bit, what is community? I talked about this for way too long during a recent all-hands meeting, and I could almost hear the eyes rolling from my colleagues.

To share a bit of that epiphany with you, here's my take on community:

A community is a group of people gathered around a shared interest. In many aspects of our daily lives, we have community.

From the school you go to, the sport you play, the religion you practice, the gym you frequent, even the grocery store you shop at.

Some communities are shallow. The group of old men I see at the gym Monday through Friday is a community, but it's clearly very different from the friend circle community we intentionally spend time with.

Web3 or crypto community is no different.

We all gathered around our shared interests. DeFi summer. NFT mania. NFT winter. Cross-chain interoperability whatever. Zero-knowledge proofs whatever.

Whatever you're into, there's a group of people diving down the rabbit hole with you.

Some were there for the financial speculation. Others, from a deep belief and commitment to the early cypherpunk movement. Some crypto communities were surface-level or perfunctory.

Others were deeply profound. I mean, deeply, deeply profound. Like a religious congregation, fanatic following, belief-in-your-gut, put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is profound.

We wore the same "clothes" (PFP), spoke our own language (WAGMI), looked crazy to outsiders, and we didn't care one bit because we believed in what we were all gathering to pursue.

Early crypto community was inseparable from belief.

Not just belief, but a deep, gut-wrenching conviction that gave you the courage to get on stage and talk for hours in front of hundreds about why you believed in the founder, the project, the roadmap, and why you were the project's diamond-handed hodler.

Conviction. That's what drove the parabolic growth in the early days. Without community, crypto would be nothing.

Across, by the way, was no exception. The early days of the Across community were the golden days. The vibes were high. There was deep conviction (yes, I'm repeating that word). Excitement, energy, people genuinely caring about the project for the innovation, not for the token price.

We hired people from that community who are still with us today. And some of the early people who stuck around are still die-hard community members, riding the waves with us.

When community is good, it's good.

And then, everything changed.

Fast forward to today. I'm going to make some sweeping generalizations here. Please know that I'm not referring to "all" community members, "every" community group, and not painting with a broad brush. But if I continue to be blunt, I'm referring to most. Vast majority.

The word "community" has been bastardized by the crypto "extractors." In many ways, if you want to know why "the love of money is the root of all evil," look no further than the countless Discord "communities."

Thousands of unread messages a day. Impressive daily active users. Constant social support, until the Token Generation Event (TGE) hits. We all know the playbook.

The vibe before TGE mimics the early crypto community sentiment. Deep conviction. Gut-wrenching fire. Courage to get on stage. PFP and project tags in bios. Ride or die, diamond hands, bullish hodler.

Then, everyone changes.

You go to sleep one night, barely able to keep up with the Discord notifications.

You wake up the next morning, and it's a ghost town.

Or worse.

You find your loyal "community" coming at you with pitchforks and torches.

Over the airdrop.

You see, "community" is no longer community.

It's devolved into endless, AI-generated spam to farm points, for the hope of an airdrop, to immediately dump, then complain about the token price, and call the project a scam or rug (which, to be fair, is often true).

You know where I'm going with this long-winded rant, right?

"Community" is no longer community. You know it. You feel it. The timeline feels off. Discord servers feel off. Podcasts feel off. Twitter Spaces feel off.

Everything feels wrong, like "Con" will never be "Confucius." Everyone reading this today knows it deep down, even if you've never articulated it this clearly before.

Today's "community" is a cheap imitation of the early community that built crypto into what it is. The shared interest of these "community" members boils down to one thing. Extraction. Quick. Decisive. Extraction. It's the poison that kills what crypto could have been, and should have been.

Most of today's (again, not all) Discord "communities" consist of the dregs of the remnants.

Some are genuine loyalists and believers. (To those who have stuck with Across, we wouldn't be here without you. Thank you. You know where to find us, we'll always have a place for you.)

Some, often the majority, are there to extract from the project. I won't dwell on that here.

And finally, those who only appear to complain. Because in every bear market, these specific types of "community" members will kick you when you're down, as if the bear market hasn't affected every team member, and as if we caused the bear market to happen.

Unfortunately, the Across Discord has recently fallen into this "majority" category as well. Our "community" has become something else.

The people who recognize the incredible achievements we've made, the progress Across has pioneered for the entire industry, and who still support us, are tired of being part of this extractive "community" and have left the Discord.

The few who remain will happily move with us to Twitter and other channels. The rest are what I defined above as "community." Yes, I'm saying this with gut-wrenching fire and deep conviction.

Therefore, today, the Across Discord is moving to read-only mode.

This is the first step in our planned, full shutdown of the server.

To the community of believers still standing with us, let's keep building. We have a lot of work to do.

To Discord, thank you for hosting some of the good old days of crypto. I will cherish them forever.

Community is dead.

Long live community.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the author, what is the core difference between early crypto communities and today's so-called 'communities'?

AThe author argues that the core difference lies in the underlying motive. Early crypto communities were driven by a deep, shared belief and passion for the technology and vision. Today's 'communities' are primarily driven by extraction - the desire to farm points, earn airdrops, sell tokens immediately for profit, and then often turn hostile towards the project. They are characterized as cheap knock-offs of the genuine early communities.

QWhat specific action is the author announcing for the Across Protocol Discord server, and why?

AThe author announces that the Across Protocol Discord server will be set to read-only mode, which is the first step in a planned full shutdown. The reason is that their Discord has been overrun by the 'extractive' majority, driving away the genuine, loyal community members. The noise and negativity no longer serve the project's builders and true believers.

QHow does the author define a 'community' in the broader sense, beyond just web3?

AThe author defines a community as a group of people gathered around a shared interest. They provide examples from everyday life such as school, sports, religion, the gym, or even a local grocery store. The author notes that communities can be shallow (like nodding acquaintances at the gym) or deep and meaningful (like close friend groups).

QWhat positive aspects of the early 'golden era' of crypto communities does the author miss?

AThe author misses the authentic 'vibing' on platforms like Clubhouse and Discord, where people discussed crypto topics out of genuine interest, shared experiences, dreamed up new projects, and collaboratively 'built' things. These interactions were based on excitement, innovation, and a shared belief in the project's potential, not just token price. Many real friendships were formed during this time.

QWhat is the primary 'poison' that the author believes has killed the potential of what crypto communities could have been?

AThe author identifies 'extraction' as the primary poison. The current environment is dominated by individuals whose sole common interest is to quickly and decisively extract value from projects through activities like airdrop farming, followed by selling tokens and complaining. This self-serving behavior has corrupted the genuine communal spirit.

Letture associate

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手13 min fa

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手13 min fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit46 min fa

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit46 min fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit1 h fa

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit1 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

Recently, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," first outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's March mandate as core principles guiding its focus: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. CROPS represents Ethereum's commitment to providing foundational capabilities for user sovereignty—enabling asset ownership, identity expression, and coordination without reliance on centralized platforms or surrendering ultimate control. This framework is gaining new urgency with the rise of AI, particularly AI agents managing digital assets and automating transactions. While AI offers convenience, it risks centralizing user data, intent, and control if dependent on opaque, centralized services. Vitalik argues for "CROPS AI"—AI that is open, privacy-preserving, secure, and capable of local execution to maintain user agency. He highlights convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layers" and "CROPS AI," such as using zero-knowledge proofs for private remote LLM calls and Ethereum RPC reads, ensuring users can access services without exposing sensitive information. Ultimately, CROPS is not just an abstract ideal but a practical guide for Ethereum's development and AI integration. It addresses the critical long-term question: as digital systems grow more powerful, how can users retain control over their privacy, assets, and autonomy? In an AI-driven era, these principles may define Ethereum's enduring value—prioritizing verifiable, secure, and user-centric design over short-term optimizations like speed and cost alone.

marsbit2 h fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly Is This 'Slow Variable' That Vitalik Has Repeatedly Emphasized?

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片