Coinone Hit With Fines and Trading Curbs Over AML Violations in South Korea

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-04-14Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-14

Introduzione

Coinone, South Korea's third-largest cryptocurrency exchange, has been fined 5.2 billion won ($3.5 million) and issued a three-month partial business suspension by the country's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). The penalties are due to multiple anti-money laundering violations, including a failure to verify user identities in approximately 70,000 instances. The FIU also found that Coinone processed over 10,000 transactions with 16 registered offshore exchanges and neglected its customer due diligence responsibilities. This is the second major regulatory action against a South Korean exchange in a month, following similar penalties against Bithumb. The Bank of Korea is now advocating for stricter regulations, including trading limitations to halt activity during abnormal market fluctuations.

According to local local media reports, Coinone, the third-largest cryptocurrency exchange in South Korea, is facing fines and a partial business suspension due to anti-money laundering violations.

Coinone was reportedly held by South Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission for noncompliance with anti-money laundering requirements, including the failure to verify user identities in around 70,000 instances, according to Monday’s reports in The Korea Times, Chosun, and Yonhap News.

In addition, the FIU said that, despite several warnings, Coinone enabled over 10,000 transactions with 16 offshore exchanges that were not registered with South Korean authorities.

The company is also accused of neglecting to limit transactions for clients whose verification steps were not completed and of classifying customer verification as complete while critical information was lacking, both of which constitute violations of customer due diligence responsibilities.

Enforcing Stringent Regulations

Following March’s $24 million fine and six-month partial suspension at Bithumb—the country’s second-largest crypto exchange by trading volume—for alleged anti-money laundering violations, this is the second regulatory action against exchanges in the last month to occur in South Korea.

Following an error by Bithumb, which resulted in the incorrect delivery of 620,000 Bitcoin to consumers (equivalent to around $42 billion at the time) rather than 620,000 Korean won, the Bank of Korea pushed for the adoption of stricter regulations on exchanges.

On Monday, the central bank suggested that legislators introduce measures to halt trading in the case of anomalous behavior or abrupt fluctuations in cryptocurrency values by instituting trading limitations. Until the three-month partial business restriction is removed, new users are unable to deposit or withdraw money from the exchange, and Coinone was fined 5.2 billion won ($3.5 million) by the FIU.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ethereum Price Gains Traction as ETF Flows Shift and Network Activity Surges

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main reason Coinone is facing fines and a partial business suspension?

ACoinone is facing fines and a partial business suspension due to anti-money laundering (AML) violations, including the failure to verify user identities in approximately 70,000 instances.

QWhich regulatory body is responsible for holding Coinone accountable for these violations?

ASouth Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the Financial Services Commission is the regulatory body holding Coinone accountable.

QWhat was one of the specific failures in customer due diligence that Coinone was accused of?

ACoinone was accused of neglecting to limit transactions for clients whose verification steps were not completed and of classifying customer verification as complete while critical information was lacking.

QHow much was the fine imposed on Coinone by the FIU?

AThe FIU fined Coinone 5.2 billion won, which is equivalent to approximately $3.5 million.

QWhat recent regulatory action against another major South Korean exchange preceded this action against Coinone?

AThis action against Coinone follows a $24 million fine and a six-month partial suspension imposed on Bithumb, the country's second-largest crypto exchange, for alleged anti-money laundering violations in March.

Letture associate

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit31 min fa

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit31 min fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit41 min fa

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit41 min fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist50 min fa

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist50 min fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2 h fa

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2 h fa

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2 h fa

marsbit2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures