CoinFound × OSL Research Launches Stablecoin Research Collaboration, First Phase Focuses on USDGO

marsbitPubblicato 2026-04-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-09

Introduzione

CoinFound and OSL Research have launched a stablecoin research partnership, with the initial phase centered on USDGO. The collaboration will conduct thematic research on the USDGO stablecoin ecosystem, utilizing on-chain data analysis and market structure observations. The study aims to explore the development path of stablecoins within the digital financial system and their application potential in trading, settlement, and on-chain financial scenarios. As stablecoins increasingly serve as a bridge between traditional finance and on-chain financial infrastructure, there is growing demand for research into their issuance mechanisms, liquidity structures, and ecosystem synergies. CoinFound and OSL Research will collaborate on building research frameworks and sharing industry insights. Their joint efforts will include co-developing research content, establishing data analysis frameworks, and publishing findings through reports, market observations, and thematic analyses. OSL Research, part of the OSL Group, focuses on in-depth digital asset research and provides forward-looking market insights. CoinFound specializes in Web3 data and research, offering analysis of asset structures and capital flow trends through on-chain analytics. Together, they aim to advance stablecoin research and provide clearer industry benchmarks for the digital asset market.

As the first research direction of the collaboration, both parties will conduct a thematic study on the USDGO stablecoin ecosystem. Through on-chain data analysis and market structure observation, they will explore the development path of stablecoins in the digital financial system and their application potential in trading, settlement, and on-chain financial scenarios.

As stablecoins increasingly become a critical bridge connecting the traditional financial system with on-chain financial infrastructure, market demand for research on stablecoin issuance mechanisms, liquidity structures, and ecosystem synergy continues to grow. Against this backdrop, the collaboration between CoinFound and OSL Research will focus on building a joint research framework and delivering industry insights. Both parties will cooperate in co-creating research content and data analysis frameworks, releasing findings to the market through joint research reports, industry observations, and thematic analyses.

OSL Research, a subsidiary of the OSL Group, specializes in in-depth research on the digital asset industry, providing forward-looking market insights.

CoinFound focuses on Web3 data and research, offering insights into asset structures and capital flows through on-chain analysis and industry research.

Both parties aim to promote the continuous deepening of stablecoin-related research through this collaboration and provide clearer industry references for the digital asset market.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the primary focus of the initial research collaboration between CoinFound and OSL Research?

AThe initial research will focus on the USDGO stablecoin ecosystem, examining its development path in the digital financial system and its application potential in trading, settlement, and on-chain financial scenarios.

QWhy is there an increasing market demand for research on stablecoins according to the article?

ABecause stablecoins are increasingly becoming a critical bridge connecting the traditional financial system with on-chain financial infrastructure, raising the need for studies on their issuance mechanisms, liquidity structures, and ecological synergy.

QWhat specific areas will the CoinFound and OSL Research collaboration cover in terms of methodology?

AThe collaboration will cover joint building of research frameworks and data analysis frameworks, utilizing on-chain data analysis and market structure observation.

QWhat are the respective research specialties of OSL Research and CoinFound as described in the article?

AOSL Research focuses on in-depth research of the digital asset industry and provides forward-looking market insights. CoinFound specializes in Web3 data and research, offering insights into asset structures and fund flows through on-chain analysis and industry research.

QWhat is the ultimate goal of the research partnership between CoinFound and OSL Research?

AThe goal is to promote the continued deepening of stablecoin-related research and provide clearer industry references for the digital asset market.

Letture associate

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit17 min fa

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit17 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手29 min fa

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手29 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit44 min fa

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit44 min fa

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手47 min fa

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手47 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片