Coinbase Introduces Staked Ethereum Loans, Allowing Users to Borrow Up to $1 Million

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-23Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-23

Introduzione

Coinbase has introduced a new staked Ethereum loan service for eligible U.S. users, enabling them to borrow up to $1 million in USDC using cbETH—a token representing their staked ETH—as collateral. This allows borrowers to retain staking rewards and maintain exposure to ETH's price movements while accessing liquidity. Loans are overcollateralized, with interest rates based on market conditions and no fixed repayment date. However, borrowers must keep the loan-to-value ratio below 86% to avoid automatic liquidation in case of sharp ETH price drops. The feature, powered by Morpho, offers long-term stakers greater flexibility without needing to unstake or sell their ETH.

Coinbase has launched a new borrowing feature which allows the eligible U.S. users to borrow upto $1 million in USDC without selling or unstaking their ETH. The users can use the new product, cbETH, which is Coinbase’s token that represents the staked ETH as collateral to borrow USDC. This makes users continue earning staking rewards and maintain exposure to ETH’s price movement.

How Coinbase’s cbETH Borrowing Works

The users who hold the cbETH can deposit it as collateral on the coinbase and can borrow USDC against it. The borrowed USDC can be converted into U.S. dollars directly inside Coinbase. Depending on the collateral, the loans can go upto $1 million. The Loans are Overcollateralized which means the users must deposit more value than they borrow, with the interest changing based on the market conditions. Borrowers can repay part or the full amount of the loan at any time without a fixed repayment date. This lending system is powered by Morpho, an on-chain lending protocol.

Coinbase warns users to keep their loan-to-value below 86%. If the ETH price falls sharply, then the automatic liquidations will happen, and the borrowers should face the penalties. Because ETH is more volatile, borrowers must carefully manage the risks.

Staking ETH usually locks the funds for a long period. By allowing the cbETH to be used as collateral, users can keep their Ether exposure and access liquidity without selling during market downturns. This makes the staked Ether more flexible and useful for the long-term holders.

This launch shows how the crypto platforms are evolving beyond simple buying and selling. Tokenized staking products like cbETH are becoming more popular as investors are looking for ways to avoid locking their capital while still earning yield.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Capital One to Acquire Brex in $5.15B Deal, Expanding Fintech Push

TagsCoinbaseETHEREUM

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the maximum amount users can borrow through Coinbase's new staked Ethereum loan feature?

AUsers can borrow up to $1 million in USDC.

QWhat cryptocurrency must users stake as collateral to access these loans?

AUsers must stake cbETH, which is Coinbase's token that represents staked ETH, as collateral.

QWhat is the main advantage for users who borrow against their staked ETH instead of selling it?

AUsers can continue earning staking rewards and maintain exposure to ETH's price movement while accessing liquidity.

QWhat on-chain lending protocol powers Coinbase's new borrowing system?

AThe lending system is powered by Morpho, an on-chain lending protocol.

QWhat critical risk warning does Coinbase give to borrowers regarding their loan-to-value ratio?

ACoinbase warns users to keep their loan-to-value below 86% to avoid automatic liquidations and penalties if the ETH price falls sharply.

Letture associate

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit37 min fa

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit37 min fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1 h fa

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片