Coinbase Flags Concerns Over CLARITY Bill

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-12

Introduzione

Coinbase has threatened to withdraw its support for the upcoming CLARITY Act, a key U.S. crypto bill, if it restricts the ability of platforms to offer rewards on stablecoin holdings beyond basic disclosure rules. The exchange argues such limitations would harm its business and competition in the stablecoin market, particularly affecting rewards programs for assets like USD Coin. This stance follows the earlier GENIUS Act, which prohibited issuers from paying yields but allowed third-party platforms to offer rewards. Coinbase claims restricting platform-based rewards would undermine previous compromises and unfairly advantage traditional banks. The issue arises as policymakers work on broader crypto market reforms, with some senators seeking a compromise that would permit rewards only for chartered banks or trust companies.

As per the reports, it is speculated that Coinbase might withdraw its support for Washington’s upcoming major crypto bill. The firm is setting its boundaries as Congress moves closer to finalising its upcoming major crypto bill named the CLARITY Act.

In a report shared by Bloomberg on January 11, a warning surfaced as policymakers got ready to put up an extensive digital-asset market structure bill in the Senate later this week. Coinbase revealed that it may pull out its support for the CLARITY Act if it limits stablecoin rewards beyond fundamental disclosure rules.

As per the exchange, the issue directly hits its business and the competition in the stablecoin market, and the people close to the company’s thinking think alike. The ability to offer rewards on stablecoin balances, mainly USD Coin, remains at stake.

Association with the other Act

The debate trails through the GENIUS Act in July, which made the first federal framework for stablecoin issuers. That law bars creators from paying interest or yield associated only with holding stablecoins, but it does not obstruct third-party platforms from offering rewards to users.

Companies associated with crypto say that distinction was intentional. The officials from Coinbase state that prohibiting platform-based rewards would revoke compromises so far settled in the GENIUS Act and shift the field in favour of banks.

The firm has also mounted rewards as a way to make the role of the dollar in global digital finance more robust, mainly as different countries explore interest-bearing virtual currencies. Political pressure surrounding the bill is also increasing. In the election cycle of 2023-24, the crypto industry was leading in being the largest corporate political spender, in which Coinbase was a prominent donor.

The threat to withdraw support has weight as policymakers attempt to maintain momentum in the back of broader market structure reforms. Still, the final outcome is not clear. Some senators are looking for a middle ground that would permit rewards only for companies holding bank or trust charters.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitcoin Holds Near $92K as Asia Rises Ahead of US CPI Data

Domande pertinenti

QWhy might Coinbase withdraw its support for the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase may withdraw its support if the CLARITY Act limits stablecoin rewards beyond fundamental disclosure rules, as this directly impacts its business and competition in the stablecoin market.

QWhat is the main concern for Coinbase regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe main concern is the potential restriction on the ability to offer rewards on stablecoin balances, particularly for USD Coin, which is a key part of its business model.

QHow does the GENIUS Act relate to the current debate over the CLARITY Act?

AThe GENIUS Act, passed in July, established the first federal framework for stablecoin issuers. It prohibits issuers from paying interest directly but allows third-party platforms to offer rewards. The current debate centers on whether the CLARITY Act will uphold this distinction.

QWhat is the crypto industry's argument for allowing platform-based stablecoin rewards?

AThe industry argues that prohibiting platform-based rewards would undo compromises made in the GENIUS Act and unfairly shift the competitive landscape in favor of traditional banks.

QWhat is one potential legislative compromise being considered regarding stablecoin rewards?

ASome senators are seeking a middle ground that would permit rewards only for companies that hold a bank or trust charter, attempting to balance innovation with regulatory oversight.

Letture associate

Coinbase Launches Crypto-Backed USDC Loans For UK Users In Latest Expansion

Coinbase has expanded its crypto-backed USDC lending service to UK residents, allowing them to use Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Coinbase Wrapped Staked Ether (cbETH) as collateral. Powered by the on-chain protocol Morpho on the Base network, the service enables users to borrow up to $5 million in USDC without selling their crypto holdings. Collateral is locked in a smart contract until the loan is repaid, with liquidation triggered if the loan-to-value ratio exceeds a threshold. This follows the service’s successful US launch, where originations surpassed $2.17 billion. The move is part of Coinbase’s broader expansion in the UK, including savings accounts and DEX trading, and aligns with its efforts to integrate crypto into traditional finance, such as recently offering crypto-backed mortgages.

bitcoinist29 min fa

Coinbase Launches Crypto-Backed USDC Loans For UK Users In Latest Expansion

bitcoinist29 min fa

Capital Flow Analysis Shows Ozak AI Absorbing Liquidity From BTC, ETH, and SOL During Market Pullbacks

Capital flow analysis indicates that during recent market pullbacks, liquidity is rotating from major cryptocurrencies like BTC, ETH, and SOL into Ozak AI, an early-stage AI project. Priced at $0.014, Ozak AI has raised over $6.8 million and sold more than 1.17 billion tokens in its presale, showing steady and sustained capital absorption rather than hype-driven spikes. Analysts describe this shift as strategic redeployment, not panic selling, driven by Ozak AI’s relative valuation efficiency, AI-native utility (including Prediction Agents and EigenLayer integration), and favorable risk-reward timing. The trend reflects a structural rotation into high-growth AI infrastructure projects during large-cap consolidation, with Ozak AI emerging as a preferred alternative for asymmetric returns.

TheNewsCrypto1 h fa

Capital Flow Analysis Shows Ozak AI Absorbing Liquidity From BTC, ETH, and SOL During Market Pullbacks

TheNewsCrypto1 h fa

DeFi Falls into the Most Dangerous Prisoner's Dilemma in History

ChainCatcher author Gu Yu analyzes the severe fallout from the Kelp DAO exploit, which has triggered a crisis of confidence across the DeFi ecosystem, implicating major projects like Aave, LayerZero, and Arbitrum. The attack, attributed to the Lazarus Group, exploited a single-validator (1/1) configuration in LayerZero’s decentralized verification network (DVN), leading to over $40M in losses. LayerZero’s official report claimed its protocol “operated as expected” and deflected blame onto Kelp DAO’s configuration choices, sparking backlash from developers and researchers who criticized its avoidance of responsibility. Meanwhile, Arbitrum’s security committee intervened by using a privileged transaction to freeze and recover ~30,766 ETH ($71M) from the hacker’s address—a move praised for pragmatism but criticized for undermining Layer2 decentralization ideals. The incident has intensified debates on cross-chain bridge security, Layer2 centralization risks, and the tension between practical security measures and decentralized principles. With Aave facing ~$200M in bad debt and no clear compensation plan from Kelp DAO or LayerZero, the situation reflects a dangerous “prisoner’s dilemma” where key players prioritize self-interest over collective trust, threatening foundational DeFi narratives.

marsbit1 h fa

DeFi Falls into the Most Dangerous Prisoner's Dilemma in History

marsbit1 h fa

Not Speculation but a Necessity: The 4 Unique Values of Prediction Markets

Polymarket's recent $4 billion funding round and soaring valuation of $15 billion highlight the explosive growth of prediction markets, with trading volume reaching $25.7 billion in March 2026—a 10.6% monthly increase. This analysis argues that prediction markets serve critical non-speculative functions, positioning them as essential tools rather than mere gambling platforms. Prediction markets offer four unique values: entertainment consumption, insurance-like protection, risk hedging, and truth discovery. Firstly, they stimulate economic activity by engaging users in event-based betting, similar to the broader sports industry. Secondly, they act as a form of decentralized insurance, allowing users to hedge against specific, well-defined risks (e.g., weather events) transparently and without traditional overhead costs. Thirdly, institutions and individuals use these markets to hedge against geopolitical and commodity price risks, as demonstrated during the U.S.-Iran conflict and the launch of 24/7 commodity markets on platforms like Kalshi. Finally, prediction markets counter media bias by aggregating crowd-sourced information, often achieving 30% higher accuracy than surveys due to users' vested interests. Experts like Bitwise’s Jeff Park and SIG’s Jeff Yass emphasize the markets' role in risk transfer and financial innovation. As these platforms evolve, they are poised to become trillion-dollar markets, offering more reliable, decentralized mechanisms for information pricing and risk management.

marsbit1 h fa

Not Speculation but a Necessity: The 4 Unique Values of Prediction Markets

Polymarket's recent $4 billion funding round, valuing it at $15 billion, highlights the explosive growth of prediction markets, with trading volume surging from $8.7 billion to $25.7 billion in just a few months. This article argues that prediction markets are not merely speculative gambling platforms but serve four core functions. First, they act as a form of entertainment and consumption, stimulating economic activity similar to the sports industry. Second, they provide a form of limited insurance, allowing users to hedge against specific, well-defined risks (e.g., weather events) in a transparent, cost-effective manner without traditional insurance overhead. Third, they are powerful tools for risk hedging, enabling both individuals and institutions to mitigate exposure to volatile events like commodity price swings and geopolitical crises. Finally, prediction markets can function as "truth machines," aggregating crowd wisdom to counter media narratives and biases, with some claims suggesting a 30% higher accuracy over traditional surveys. The piece concludes that the role and potential value of prediction markets are far greater than commonly perceived, positioning them as a significant future market.

Odaily星球日报2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures