Coinbase Announces Delisting of 6 Altcoin Trading Pairs!

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-08-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-08-05

Introduzione

Coinbase, a major US cryptocurrency exchange, announced the delisting of six trading pairs to improve overall market health and concentrate liquidity into fewer pairs. The specific pairs being removed are LSETH-ETH, MINA-EUR, GRT-GBP, MASK-GBP, CHZ-USDT, and CRO-USDT. Trading for these pairs will cease on August 6, 2026. While support for the underlying assets continues, the specified trading pairs will no longer be available. Users of Coinbase Advanced Trade in relevant regions can still buy and sell these assets via USD order books. The exchange noted that the pairs MINA-EUR, GRT-GBP, MASK-GBP, CHZ-USDT, and CRO-USDT have already been moved to "limit-only" mode on Coinbase Exchange and Coinbase Advanced platforms. In this mode, users can place and cancel limit orders and receive fills at matching prices, but cannot place market orders for these pairs. No further details on the reasons for the delisting were provided.

Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, has announced the delisting of six trading pairs with the aim of improving market conditions and concentrating liquidity into a smaller number of trading pairs. No additional details were provided regarding the reasons for the delisting.

According to a statement from Coinbase Markets, trading for the pairs LSETH-ETH, $MINA-EUR, $GRT-GBP, $MASK-GBP, $CHZ-$USDT, and $CRO-$USDT will cease on August 6, 2026.

The exchange announced that support for the underlying assets will continue, but the specified trading pairs will no longer be available. Users of Coinbase Advanced Trade in the relevant regions will still be able to buy and sell these assets through order books denominated in U.S. dollars.

The exchange also announced that the trading pairs $MINA-EUR, $GRT-GBP, $MASK-GBP, $CHZ-$USDT, and $CRO-$USDT have already been moved to 'limit-only' mode on the Coinbase Exchange and Coinbase Advanced platforms.

In this mode, users can create limit orders, cancel existing orders, and receive quotes at suitable prices. However, market orders for these trading pairs cannot be placed.

*This is not investment advice.

Domande pertinenti

QHow many trading pairs are being delisted by Coinbase according to the article?

ACoinbase is delisting a total of six trading pairs.

QWhat is the stated goal of Coinbase for delisting these trading pairs?

AThe goal is to improve market conditions and concentrate liquidity in a smaller number of trading pairs.

QOn what date will trading for the specified pairs cease on Coinbase?

ATrading for the specified pairs will cease on August 6, 2026.

QWhat trading mode have several of the affected pairs (MINA-EUR, GRT-GBP, MASK-GBP, CHZ-USDT, CRO-USDT) been moved into?

AThey have been moved into a 'limit-only' mode on Coinbase Exchange and Coinbase Advanced platforms.

QDespite the delisting of these specific trading pairs, what assurance does Coinbase give regarding the underlying assets?

ACoinbase states that support for the assets themselves will continue, and users can still buy and sell them through USD-denominated order books on Coinbase Advanced Trade.

Letture associate

Investment Company Lost $2 Million in Address Poisoning Attack

An investment firm, Bofur Capital, lost $2 million in a crypto dusting (address poisoning) attack. The scammers first sent a minuscule 0.0002 USDC transaction to the firm's Ethereum wallet. The recipient address had nearly identical starting and ending characters to a legitimate counterparty the firm regularly transacted with. It is believed a wallet operator later copied the wrong address from the transaction history, inadvertently sending 2 million USDC to the fraudulent wallet, which promptly converted the funds to DAI. Analysts noted the trap was set 20 hours before the large transfer, suggesting hackers monitored the target wallet for a major withdrawal. Following the Ethereum Fusaka upgrade, such address poisoning attacks have surged dramatically. Data shows a 612% increase in USDT dusting transactions over three months, with one investor losing over 500,000 USDT. An earlier Etherscan study (covering July 2022-June 2024) identified roughly 17 million poisoning attempts, affecting at least 1.3 million users and causing over $79.3 million in losses. These attacks are even more frequent on chains with lower fees, like BSC.

cryptonews.ru18 min fa

Investment Company Lost $2 Million in Address Poisoning Attack

cryptonews.ru18 min fa

Besu Patches Vulnerabilities in 5 Components: What Node Operators Need to Know

The Ethereum client Besu, developed by the Hyperledger community, has patched five security vulnerabilities discovered by blockchain security firm CertiK. These vulnerabilities, detailed in four security advisories on August 14, were all addressed in version 26.7.1, an urgent security update initially released on July 27. The intentional delay between the patch release and the public disclosure of details gave node operators a crucial window to update. JiaLiang Chang, CertiK's Director of Security Engineering, explained this "patch first, details later" model provides defenders a time advantage, allowing them to identify affected systems, test the update, and coordinate deployments—particularly important for institutional or permissioned blockchain networks requiring formal change management. The vulnerabilities, found through CertiK's "Chain Scan" attack methodology, involved issues in block announcement handling, consensus proposal buffering, WebSocket subscription limits, and JSON-RPC filter creation. If exploited, they could have allowed an attacker to exhaust a node's memory or thread resources, compromising its availability and the consensus process. Chang highlighted that while the open-source ecosystem is moving toward more formalized security testing (like differential fuzzing and bug bounty programs), coverage remains uneven. Testing often focuses more on protocol compliance than on continuous resource exhaustion, race conditions, or deployment-specific failures. He emphasized that third-party research remains vital for uncovering attack vectors beyond routine development, advocating for a mature, cumulative security model combining continuous integration, multi-node attack testing, independent audits, and regression testing for each confirmed vulnerability.

cryptonews.ru21 min fa

Besu Patches Vulnerabilities in 5 Components: What Node Operators Need to Know

cryptonews.ru21 min fa

Hack of Term Finance: Attacker Withdraws $8.5 Million Through Governance System Vulnerability

Decentralized lending protocol Term Finance lost $8.5 million due to an exploit of its governance mechanism, not a smart contract hack. The attacker manipulated the low voter turnout in the Meta Vaults system. By depositing just 0.5 ETH, they received a token (tmvETH) representing a share in the vault. Most users did not convert this token into a separate voting token (gtmvETH). The attacker did, gaining control of 90.66% of the issued voting power despite owning only 0.017% of the vault's capital. The attacker created a legitimate governance proposal to disable the 7-day withdrawal timelock and add their own contract to receive user funds. The proposal, publicly viewable for about 145 hours, passed due to a quorum requirement of only 5% and simple majority rule. After voting ended on August 23, 2026, the proposal was executed, allowing the immediate theft of 2,841 WETH and 1.68 million USDC (later swapped for DAI) from several vaults. The incident highlights systemic risks in decentralized governance when voting rights are separated from economic stake and low participation thresholds exist. Security mechanisms like timelocks were ineffective as the attacker could disable them from within the proposal itself. In response, Term Labs irrevocably closed all Meta Vaults and revoked DAO roles. The core lending protocol remained unaffected. The attack underscores the need for governance designs where security parameters are protected from modification through ordinary proposals.

cryptonews.ru21 min fa

Hack of Term Finance: Attacker Withdraws $8.5 Million Through Governance System Vulnerability

cryptonews.ru21 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片