CLARITY Act Under Fire As Hayes Presses Trump To Shut It Down

bitcoinistPubblicato 2026-05-22Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-22

Introduzione

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes criticizes Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and the proposed CLARITY Act in a recent interview. Hayes argues that large crypto companies like Coinbase prioritize shareholder interests over the broader crypto community and retail investors. He urges former President Donald Trump to veto the CLARITY Act if it passes, contending that excessive regulation and integration with traditional finance undermine Bitcoin's original decentralized purpose. Hayes believes institutional interest is driven by inflation hedging, not ideological support for crypto. The debate highlights a deep industry divide between those seeking regulatory clarity for mainstream adoption and those warning it threatens crypto's core values.

Brian Armstrong’s role in the crypto regulation push became a flashpoint when BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes called out the Coinbase CEO by name during a recent interview.

Hayes said Armstrong is acting in the best interest of his shareholders — not the wider crypto community.

Hayes made the remarks on The Wolf Of All Streets, where he spoke at length about the proposed CLARITY Act and what he sees as a growing disconnect between large crypto companies and everyday users.

He questioned whether big corporate players truly look out for retail investors or open-source developers, suggesting their priorities lie elsewhere.

Hayes drew a sharp line between institutional interest in crypto and what he believes Bitcoin was built for. Banks, he said, are moving into the space because their clients want protection against inflation and the erosion of fiat currency — not because they believe in what crypto stands for.

Bitcoin’s track record during periods of heavy money printing is what draws institutional money in, according to Hayes, but that interest comes with strings attached.

When Regulation Becomes The Problem

Hayes wants US President Donald Trump to veto the CLARITY Act if it reaches his desk. His argument is straightforward: regulation was never the thing keeping crypto alive, and it should not be treated as a lifeline now.

Turning Bitcoin into a product managed by traditional financial institutions — wrapped in derivatives and held on bank balance sheets — strips it of the very thing that makes it different, Hayes said.

He challenged the idea that crypto needs a seat at the traditional finance table. If the end result is just another financial instrument sitting inside the existing system, Hayes argued, then nothing has really changed. The crypto industry already has that in other forms.

BTCUSD now trading at $77,181. Chart: TradingView

A Divided Industry

The debate over the CLARITY Act reflects a split that has been building inside the crypto world for some time. Those in favor of the legislation believe clear rules would bring credibility and attract more institutional money into digital assets.

Hayes sits firmly on the other side, warning that too much integration with mainstream finance could hollow out what makes decentralized systems worth building in the first place.

No veto has been issued. The CLARITY Act continues to move through the legislative process, and the industry remains divided on which path leads to a stronger future for crypto.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Domande pertinenti

QWho is Arthur Hayes calling out in the article and what is his main criticism?

AArthur Hayes is calling out Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong. His main criticism is that Armstrong and large crypto companies like Coinbase are acting in the best interest of their shareholders rather than in the interest of the wider crypto community and everyday users.

QWhat specific action does Arthur Hayes hope President Trump will take regarding the CLARITY Act, and why?

AArthur Hayes hopes President Donald Trump will veto the CLARITY Act if it reaches his desk. He argues that regulation was never what kept crypto alive and should not be treated as a lifeline now. He believes the Act would integrate crypto too deeply into the traditional financial system, stripping it of its decentralized, disruptive essence.

QAccording to Hayes, why are traditional banks and institutions moving into the crypto space?

AAccording to Hayes, banks and institutions are moving into the crypto space because their clients want protection against inflation and the erosion of fiat currency, particularly due to Bitcoin's track record during periods of heavy money printing. He states they are not moving in because they believe in the core principles of crypto.

QWhat is the core debate within the crypto industry regarding the CLARITY Act, as described in the article?

AThe core debate is a split between those who believe the CLARITY Act would bring clear rules, credibility, and attract more institutional investment, and those like Arthur Hayes who warn that too much integration with mainstream finance could hollow out the decentralized, fundamental value of crypto systems.

QWhat does Arthur Hayes believe would be the consequence of turning Bitcoin into a product managed by traditional financial institutions?

AArthur Hayes believes that turning Bitcoin into a product managed by traditional financial institutions—wrapped in derivatives and held on bank balance sheets—would strip it of the very qualities that make it different and revolutionary, ultimately resulting in no real change to the existing financial system.

Letture associate

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit57 min fa

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit57 min fa

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit1 h fa

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare PUSH

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Push Protocol (PUSH) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Push ProtocolPUSH.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Push Protocol (PUSH)Dopo aver acquistato Push Protocol (PUSH), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Push Protocol (PUSH)Scambia facilmente Push Protocol (PUSH) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

533 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.13Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare PUSH

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di PUSH PUSH sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片