CLARITY Act Moves to Senate Markup Next Week, Tim Scott Says

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-01-07Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-07

Introduzione

Senator Tim Scott announced the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act will undergo a Senate markup next week, a key step for U.S. crypto legislation. The bill aims to establish a uniform market structure for digital assets. Scott emphasized the importance of the upcoming committee vote, noting months of draft reviews and negotiations. Despite progress, the bill faces unresolved divisions within the industry. Some experts, like Gabriel Shapiro, believe a compromise is possible, while others, such as Alex Thorn, remain skeptical due to ongoing disagreements. Democrats are pushing for stricter measures, including DeFi sanctions compliance and enhanced authority for the OFAC. Regulatory uncertainty has contributed to market volatility, with significant outflows from crypto investment products recently reported. As the Senate prepares to debate the bill, stakeholders emphasize the need to balance innovation, enforcement, and investor protection, as the outcome could shape the future of crypto markets in the U.S.

A Senate markup of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has been announced for next week, marking a critical point in the future of U.S. cryptocurrency legislation, according to Tim Scott. A new cryptocurrency bill has been proposed in order to create a uniform market structure for the cryptocurrency market.

“Next Thursday, we’ll have a vote on market structure,” Scott told Breitbart News on Tuesday. “It’s important for us to get on the record and vote,” Scott added that committee members have reviewed multiple drafts over the past six months, underscoring sustained negotiations ahead of the markup.

Scott’s comments align with December remarks from David Sacks, who said the landmark legislation would reach the Senate in January. The U.S. House of Representatives has approved a measure called the CLARITY Act as of July 2025. Should the Senate enact the legislation unchanged, then it would go straight to Donald Trump for final approval.

Outstanding issues keep the industry divided

Despite the progress, the bill still faces unresolved disagreements. Crypto executives and policy experts have debated its scope since it was introduced in May 2025, and opinions remain split as the Senate vote approaches.

Gabriel Shapiro, founder of MetaLeX, said the U.S. is “probably going to get a crypto market structure bill,” but cautioned that concerns around illicit finance persist. He suggested lawmakers could still reach a compromise to address those risks.

Others express more skepticism. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, said after reviewing notes from a bipartisan Senate meeting that it remains “unclear if the two sides can come together.” Thorn pointed to several unresolved issues that could slow passage.

Democrats continue to press for changes, including requirements for DeFi front-ends to comply with sanctions and block illegal transactions. They also want to grant the Office of Foreign Assets Control special measures to act against entities linked to illicit activity.

However, Nic Carter, founding partner of Castle Island Ventures, felt that such demands were “actually pretty reasonable,” leaving scope for bipartisan support.

Markets react to regulatory uncertainty

Some market actors have pointed out that the recent volatility has been caused in part by the delay regarding the CLARITY Act. CoinShares recently attributed $952 million in outflows from crypto investment products during the week ending Dec. 19 to prolonged regulatory uncertainty, including delays in passing the bill.

Meanwhile, Coinbase Institutional’s head of strategy, John D’Agostino, said on CNBC that he understands why the process has taken time. “It’s a type of legislation that’s much more foundational to the development of crypto or any asset class, really,” he continued.

However, with the Senate on the verge of a markup session, the CLARITY Act is at a crossroads. A balance has to be struck regarding innovation, enforcement, and investor protections. The decision that is to come could determine the future of the crypto markets in the US.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Upbit Enables $CRO Staking, Expanding Cronos Access for Korean Users

TagsBlockchainCryptocrypto regulationDeFiDigital Asset

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the name of the cryptocurrency bill being discussed in the Senate and what is its primary purpose?

AThe bill is called the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act). Its primary purpose is to create a uniform market structure for the cryptocurrency market.

QAccording to the article, what is a major point of disagreement among lawmakers regarding the bill?

AA major point of disagreement is that Democrats are pressing for changes, including requirements for DeFi front-ends to comply with sanctions and block illegal transactions, and to grant the Office of Foreign Assets Control special measures to act against entities linked to illicit activity.

QHow did CoinShares link recent market volatility to the CLARITY Act?

ACoinShares attributed $952 million in outflows from crypto investment products during the week ending Dec. 19 to prolonged regulatory uncertainty, including delays in passing the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the next immediate step for the CLARITY Act in the legislative process, as announced by Tim Scott?

AThe next immediate step is a Senate markup session and a vote on market structure scheduled for the following Thursday.

QWhat did Alex Thorn of Galaxy Digital suggest about the bill's chances of passing?

AAlex Thorn suggested it remains 'unclear if the two sides can come together,' pointing to several unresolved issues that could slow the bill's passage.

Letture associate

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit12 h fa

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit12 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit14 h fa

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit14 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit14 h fa

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit14 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片