Key Takeaways
- Coinbase has withdrawn support for the Senate’s current version of the CLARITY Act, calling it worse than no legislation at all.
- The company cites concerns over a near-ban on tokenized stocks, expanded surveillance of DeFi users, and restrictions on stablecoin rewards.
- The backlash has already stalled momentum, with the Senate Banking Committee canceling its scheduled markup vote.
For years, the crypto industry has pushed Washington for clear rules. Now, one of its largest players is signaling that some clarity may be worse than none at all.
Brian Armstrong has publicly rejected the Senate’s latest draft of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, better known as the CLARITY Act.
The Coinbase CEO argues that the bill undermines innovation, weakens competition, and threatens core principles of decentralized finance (DeFi).
Armstrong’s reversal marks a sharp turn for an industry that once saw the legislation as a long-awaited path out of regulatory limbo—and it may have already derailed the bill’s progress.
XM.com
Bitunix
Bitget
Coinbase Pulls Its Support
On Jan. 14, Armstrong said Coinbase could no longer back the Senate’s revised CLARITY Act, despite months of advocacy for market structure reform.
The bill aims to define how digital assets are regulated in the U.S., including how authority is divided between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Earlier versions promised to bring much-needed certainty to exchanges, token issuers, stablecoins, and DeFi platforms.
But Armstrong said the current draft falls short of those goals.
Among his concerns:
- Provisions that effectively block tokenized equities.
- New requirements that could expose DeFi users’ financial data.
- Language that shifts power away from the CFTC—long viewed by the industry as the more appropriate crypto regulator—toward the SEC.
The Coinbase CEO also criticized proposed restrictions on stablecoin rewards, warning they would entrench traditional banks while limiting competition from crypto-native payment systems.
Armstrong said the bill, as written, would leave the industry worse off than the existing regulatory patchwork.
“We appreciate all the hard work by members of the Senate to reach a bipartisan outcome, but this version would be materially worse than the current status quo. We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill. Hopefully, we can all get to a better draft.”
Industry reaction has been split.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse described the draft as a “massive step forward.”
Meanwhile, groups such as the Digital Chamber and executives at Kraken signaled openness to amendments.
Others, however, echoed Coinbase’s concerns, arguing the bill expands surveillance and favors incumbents over open financial systems.
Senate Vote Put on Hold
The fallout was swift.
Following Armstrong’s announcement, the Senate Banking Committee delayed its scheduled markup of the bill.
Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott announced the pause, sharing that key issues remained unresolved.
The industry expected the CLARITY Act to move forward this week. However, disagreements over stablecoin yield, DeFi privacy protections, and ethics complicated the path to a vote.
Scott said he had spoken with leaders across the crypto sector, the financial industry, law enforcement, and colleagues from both parties, stressing that negotiations were still ongoing.
He framed the pause as an attempt to preserve bipartisan progress rather than abandon it, noting that the legislation reflected months of serious talks and industry input.
In the lead-up to the vote, Democratic support was largely uncertain.
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and other lawmakers warned that the bill’s ethics provisions addressing conflicts of interest represent a “red line.”
If lawmakers fail to resolve those concerns, the bill could stall in committee, where passage requires a simple majority but still relies on limited bipartisan support.
With industry unity breaking down and lawmakers divided, the CLARITY Act now faces its most serious test yet: whether it can be salvaged through further compromise or join a growing list of crypto bills that fall short at the final stage.
