Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

链捕手Pubblicato 2026-05-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-12

Introduzione

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, reported its Q1 2026 earnings on May 11th, Eastern Time. Against a backdrop of weak crypto market sentiment, USDC's average circulation in Q1 was $752 billion, with a modest 2% sequential increase to $770 billion by quarter-end. New minting volumes declined due to the poor crypto market, but remained high, indicating demand expansion beyond crypto trading. USDC's market share remained stable at 28% of the total stablecoin market, while competition from Tether's USDT persists. A key highlight was "Other Revenue," which reached $42 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though sequential growth slowed to 13%. This revenue stream, including fees from services like Web3 software, the Cipher payment network (CPN), and the Arc blockchain, is critical for diversifying away from interest income. Circle's internally held USDC share increased to 18%, helping to improve gross margin by 130 basis points to 41.4% by reducing external sharing costs. However, profitability was pressured as total revenue growth slowed, primarily due to the significant weight of interest income, which is tied to USDC规模 and Treasury rates. Adjusted EBITDA was $133 million with a 19.2% margin. Management maintained its full-year 2026 guidance for adjusted operating expenses ($570-$585 million) and other revenue ($150-$170 million). The long-term target for USDC's CAGR remains 40%, though near-term volatility is expected. The article concludes that while Circle...

Author: Dolphin Research

On May 11th Eastern Time before the market opened, Circle, the top stablecoin stock, released its first-quarter 2026 earnings.

It is important to clarify that since the scale of USDC and the interest rates on reserve assets are publicly known, about 95% of interest income is essentially predetermined. Therefore, most of the time, Circle's stock price fluctuations follow changes in USDC market capitalization, which are fundamentally tied to factors like expectations for interest rate cuts and changes in crypto asset policies.

The unexpected information that can be interpreted from the earnings report lies in other non-interest income, the company's internal operational efficiency, and the medium to long-term strategic goals reflected in the guidance.

Overall, the highlight of the first quarter remains on "Other Revenue," which the market primarily focuses on in the earnings report, reflecting the steady expansion trend of the USDC ecosystem beyond cryptocurrency scenarios. However, the rigid investments required for this ecosystem expansion will also bring significant volatility and pressure to Circle's short-term profitability.

Details are as follows:

1. Ecosystem Layout: Same Old Script, Crypto Investments Under Pressure, New Scenarios Continue to Expand

(1) Average USDC circulation in Q1 was $75.2 billion. After hitting a bottom in February, it slowly climbed to nearly $77 billion by the end of the quarter despite unfavorable geopolitical frictions, up 2% quarter-over-quarter, similar to last quarter. Newly minted USDC in the quarter was $73 billion, down sequentially, affected by the dismal crypto asset market performance in Q1. However, excluding this impact, minting volume remained at a high level, reflecting the expansion of demand scenarios beyond crypto asset investments.

Meanwhile, redemptions were $72 billion, with faster year-over-year growth, reflecting some users cashing out profits or shifting to other interest-bearing products amid pressure in the crypto asset market.

The ratio of competitor USDT's scale to USDC fell in January but quickly recovered in the following two months. Therefore, from a competitive perspective, USDT still poses a significant competitive threat. After the Drift hacking incident in April, public sentiment turned against Circle, while Tether actively provided real financial assistance to Drift, causing Circle to lose some customers.

We are still in the early stages of growing the overall stablecoin pie, so competition is not yet a major factor affecting USDC's growth.

(2) Distribution within the USDC ecosystem: The share held within Circle increased further to 18%, with the average daily retention ratio also at 17.2%. Over the past year, this has increased quarter by quarter from 6% to the current level. At the same time, the external sharing ratio of reserve interest income decreased slightly by 1 percentage point, with potential for further optimization to enhance profitability.Coinbase accounted for nearly 25%, showing a trend of active retention compared to last quarter.

(3) As of the end of Q1, the number of digital wallets (MeWs, crypto wallets holding more than $10 on-chain) reached 7.2 million, with a net increase of 400,000 sequentially in the quarter, exceeding market expectations and reflecting growth in the platform's direct user base.

(4) In terms of ecosystem expansion news, Q1 mainly involved partnerships with Cash App, Polymarket, and Kyriba (platforms supporting native USDC transactions), while also advancing the Arc blockchain and the scale of CPN transactions.

Total on-chain USDC transactions in Q1 reached $21.5 trillion, up 263% year-over-year. CPN annualized transaction volume based on March was $8.3 billion. In April, the new product Managed Payments was launched, allowing financial institutions to enable stablecoin payments without managing digital assets.

2. Revenue Has Highlights But Less Impressive Than Last Quarter: Non-Interest Revenue Performance Exceeds Expectations, But Sequential Growth Slows.

The aforementioned B2B ecosystem expansion also brings Circle revenue beyond reserve interest – recorded under "Other Revenue." Therefore, in addition to helping expand the USDC market, this is also a second growth curve Circle is developing to counter pressure from reserve interest growth during a potential rate-cutting cycle.

Other revenue in Q1 reached $42 million. Although still a small proportion (6%), it still achieved double-digit year-over-year growth despite a higher base. However, looking at the trend, the sequential growth rate of 13% slowed compared to last quarter's 29%, making it less impressive than last quarter.

3. Gross Margin: Increased Retention Share Buffers Cost-Sharing Pressure

The market previously worried that while expanding its ecosystem, Circle would need to share reserve interest income with partners. Additionally, Coinbase's earnings report revealed its rising share of USDC, which could increase Circle's channel distribution costs and pressure gross margins.

The reality is that Circle continues to alleviate cost growth pressure by increasing its own share of USDC holdings. Among these, the cost paid to Coinbase as a share of the total cost-sharing expense is decreasing (from 97% to 75%). It's worth noting that Coinbase, having the most leverage in its partnership with Circle, also has the highest revenue-sharing ratio at 50%.

Furthermore, software, payments, and other infrastructure service revenues within Other Revenue are mostly high-margin businesses. This quarter, growth in other businesses was faster, and their contribution to revenue also increased. The final gross margin was 41.4%, improving by 130 basis points sequentially.

4. Under Rigid Investment Cycle, Profit Under Pressure: Operating Profit Declined Significantly Year-over-Year, Also Due to the Sensitivity of Profit to Changes in the Large-Share Interest Income Under Rigid Investment Cycles.

However, in the Q1 earnings report, management maintained its guidance for the 2026 fiscal year, keeping the full-year adjusted operating expense range unchanged at $570-585 million, better than the market's higher investment expectation ($725 million).

5. Future Growth: Guidance Unchanged, Short-Term Volatility Warrants Caution

(1) Regarding the outlook for USDC scale growth over multiple years, Q1 management maintained its expectation of a 40% CAGR over multiple years. However, similar to last quarter, Dolphin Research believes caution should be exercised and immediate pricing in is not necessary: Given significant market changes, this can be temporarily overlooked. Based on last year's situation, this medium-to-long-term qualitative guidance does not guarantee short-term achievement.

(2) Other revenue also maintains a target of $150-170 million, representing 46% year-over-year growth. If simply annualizing Q1, it's $167 million, right within the target range. However, Dolphin Research believes that with the effective advancement of the CLARITY Act, there is still great potential for this guidance to be beaten.

6. Key Financial Metrics Overview

Dolphin Research's View

Q1 performance is similar to a "strengthened" version of last year's Q4 – sentiment for crypto asset trading cooled further, but Circle did not stop expanding into other scenarios, resulting in even greater short-term profit pressure.

Although Coinbase and Circle belong to different parts of the industry chain, and the impact during unfavorable crypto asset market conditions differs for both (Circle is less affected), and there is also the issue of profit-sharing between them, in the short term, their trading rhythms largely move in tandem in terms of the broader direction.

Therefore, last quarter, we focused on a safety-first price given crypto asset pressure and unclear policy timelines. This quarter, we are more inclined to assess how much upside recovery space remains. The current valuation of $28 billion corresponds to Dolphin Research's neutral expectation from its initial coverage last year (refer toCoinbase vs Circle: Who Dominates in the Symbiotic Yet Cutthroat Stablecoin Arena?).

However, given significant short-term volatility, we estimate based on this year's performance outlook:

Assuming for the remaining three quarters of this year, crypto asset market conditions stabilize but last year's bull run may not be replicated due to inflation and interest rate expectations. Therefore, we project stablecoin scale to grow 5% sequentially (QoQ growth from Q2 to Q3 last year was 12%), reaching $870 billion by year-end. Assuming an unchanged federal funds rate of 3.5%, total annual interest income would be $2.8 billion. Other revenue is expected to exceed the upper guidance limit of $170 million, resulting in total revenue of $3 billion, a 9% year-over-year increase.

With a gross margin of 42% and guided adjusted operating expenses midpoint of $580 million, adjusted operating profit would be $680 million. Yesterday's closing price**** (***Locked content and detailed valuation analysis have been published in the article of the same name in the "Dynamics - In-Depth" section of the Longbridge App).

In summary, Circle's current valuation has largely completed a reasonable recovery process. The opening of further upside depends on the expansion progress of stablecoins and USDC specifically. In the short term, the effective advancement of the CLARITY Act, barring more systemic macro risks, could provide some positive sentiment, supporting the current valuation.

Detailed Analysis Below

I. Circle's Basic Business Framework

Circle is the issuer of the stablecoin USDC. Its primary revenue comes from: (1) Interest on reserve assets, which is tied to the circulating supply of USDC and Treasury interest rates. (2) Other revenue, including fees from providing Web3 software (SaaS subscriptions), CPN payments (fees based on transaction amount/number), and service or gas fees from the Arc blockchain (charged per transaction).

To mitigate the impact of potential interest rate cuts, Circle is actively developing its other revenue streams. In 2025, it primarily advanced CPN payments and the Arc blockchain business. Currently, other revenue accounts for nearly 5% and is expected to accelerate growth and expand its scale.

On the expense side, Circle's internal operational costs are mainly employee compensation. External costs primarily consist of channel sharing and transaction costs, which account for about 60% of revenue (most going to Coinbase). The adjusted EBITDA margin, after adding back depreciation and stock-based compensation, is around 20%, lower than most fintech platforms. Therefore, while expanding the ecosystem, expectations of increased cost-sharing have led some investors to worry about Circle's short-term profit pressure.

From a medium to long-term perspective, ecosystem expansion is more critical. Currently, USDC ranks second in the overall stablecoin market. Compared to the leader USDT, its advantage lies in compliance. Once the CLARITY Act is enacted, USDC is expected to further leverage its "relative" advantage and attract more institutional capital.

II. USDC Ecosystem: Accelerating New Minting, Short-Term Impacted by Crypto Asset Pressure

Average USDC circulation in Q1 was $75.2 billion, down sequentially, but climbed to $77 billion by quarter-end, up 2% sequentially. Minting in the quarter was $73 billion, redemptions were $72 billion. Net new issuance slowed significantly compared to Q3. According to Coinmarketcap, USDC circulation balance plummeted rapidly in January amid a panic sell-off in crypto assets, only rebounding in early February.

1. USDC External Market Share

In the overall stablecoin market, USDC's share remained stable sequentially at 28%. Compared to its direct competitor USDT, USDC has not demonstrated sustained competitive advantage.

2. Internal Channel Competition for USDC

Regarding the distribution of USDC across different channels, the share held internally by Circle continued to increase, reaching 18%.

Based on Coinbase's Q1 earnings report disclosure, its share of USDC circulation increased sequentially to 25%, indicating a trend of active retention compared to last quarter.

Another core metric reflecting ecosystem development – the number of active digital wallets. As of the end of Q1, the number of digital wallet MeWs (crypto wallets holding more than $10 on-chain) reached 7.2 million, a net sequential increase of 400,000, which is speculated to have continued slowing due to pressure in the crypto market.

III. Other Revenue Continues to Exceed Expectations, But the Trend is Not Aggressive Enough

Since about 95% of Circle's revenue from reserve asset interest is essentially public information, the main source of expectation variance is other revenue, and Q1 performance continued to exceed expectations.

Specifically, other revenue primarily includes income from minting, transactions, custody, Web3 API suite, tokenized fund USYC, and fees from CPN launched last April (fixed access fees + settlement/audit fees per transaction, Arc chain gas fees, etc.).

Other revenue in Q1 was $42 million, up 13% sequentially, showing a slowdown and was less impressive than last quarter. Additionally, the company's guidance for full-year other revenue remains at $150-170 million. From a sequential growth trend perspective, this is not particularly aggressive. Dolphin Research believes that if USDC expands normally, there is potential to beat this guidance.

The main revenue, which constitutes the majority, is affected by the pace of USDC expansion and the current Treasury rate environment. In Q1, the average USDC scale increased 70% year-over-year, while the interest rate dropped to 3.5%, down 64 basis points year-over-year. Ultimately, reserve interest revenue growth was 17%, slowing rapidly.

However, expectations for future rate cuts have basically fallen to zero. Therefore, with stable interest rates, if scale expands normally over the next three quarters (QoQ >5%), there is still hope for 5-10% growth for the full year despite year-over-year pressure from interest rates.

IV. Profit Under Pressure Amid Rigid Investments

Q1 gross margin increased by 130 basis points sequentially to 41.4%. Circle continues to alleviate channel cost-sharing pressure by increasing its share of USDC holdings. Additionally, software, payments, and other infrastructure service revenues are mostly high-margin businesses. This quarter, growth in other businesses was faster, and their revenue contribution also increased.

Despite slowing revenue growth pressure in Q1, various expense items still maintained high growth. Final adjusted EBITDA was $133 million, with a margin of 19.2%, up 50 basis points sequentially.

The company's guidance for full-year 2026 costs and operating expenses (excluding SBC and depreciation/amortization) remains unchanged at $570-585 million, representing 10% year-over-year growth, lower than market expectations.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat are Circle's two main sources of revenue as described in the article?

ACircle's two main sources of revenue are: 1) Interest income from reserve assets, which is tied to the circulating USDC scale and treasury rates. 2) Other income, which includes fees from Web3 software services (SaaS subscriptions), Circle Payment Network (CPN) transactions, and services or gas fees related to its Arc public chain.

QHow did Circle's 'Other Income' perform in Q1 2026, and why is this metric significant?

AIn Q1 2026, Circle's 'Other Income' reached $42 million, representing 6% of total revenue. It continued to double year-over-year, though its sequential growth rate of 13% slowed compared to the previous quarter's 29%. This metric is significant because it reflects the expansion of the USDC ecosystem into non-cryptocurrency use cases and serves as a potential 'second growth curve' for the company, especially as it aims to offset future pressure from declining interest income.

QWhat is the main competitive threat to USDC mentioned in the article, and what is the current state of that competition?

AThe main competitive threat to USDC mentioned is the rival stablecoin USDT (Tether). The article states that USDT's competitive threat 'remains significant.' While USDC maintained a 28% share of the overall stablecoin market, its share relative to USDT did not show a sustained competitive advantage. The competition is currently in the early stages of growing the overall stablecoin market, so it is not yet the primary factor limiting USDC's growth.

QWhat was the trend in USDC's internal channel distribution during Q1 2026, particularly regarding holdings by Circle and Coinbase?

ADuring Q1 2026, the proportion of USDC held within Circle's own ecosystem increased further to 18%, with a daily average retention rate of 17.2%. This has grown consistently from 6% over the past year. Meanwhile, based on Coinbase's quarterly report, its share of the circulating USDC also rose to nearly 25%, indicating an ongoing trend of active retention on that platform.

QWhat are the key factors the article's author (Dolphin Research) considers for Circle's future valuation and growth potential?

AThe author believes that Circle's current valuation is mostly reasonable after a correction. Future growth and valuation expansion depend on the pace of stablecoin and USDC adoption. In the short term, the effective advancement of the CLARITY Act could provide positive market sentiment to support the current valuation, assuming no major systemic macro risks. The author also notes that while management maintains a long-term USDC growth target (40% CAGR), investors should remain cautious as short-term performance may not immediately meet this qualitative guidance.

Letture associate

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit3 min fa

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit3 min fa

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit40 min fa

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit40 min fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1 h fa

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片