Circle moves toward privacy-focused stablecoin with USDCx project

cointelegraphPubblicato 2025-12-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-09

Introduzione

Circle is developing a privacy-enhanced version of its USDC stablecoin, called USDCx, in partnership with blockchain firm Aleo. Aimed at banking and enterprise users, USDCx will offer "banking-level privacy" by concealing transaction details onchain, while still allowing compliance with regulatory requests. This addresses a key hurdle for institutional adoption, as many financial firms hesitate to use public blockchains due to transparency concerns. The move comes amid growing corporate interest in stablecoins following the US GENIUS Act, with major players like Citigroup, JPMorgan, and Visa expanding their stablecoin initiatives. USDC and USDT currently dominate the dollar-pegged stablecoin market.

Stablecoin issuer Circle is developing a privacy-enhanced version of its US dollar-pegged USDC token, aiming to spur institutional adoption by offering greater confidentiality than traditional public blockchains allow.

The new stablecoin, called USDCx and targeting banking and enterprise users, is being built in partnership with the privacy-focused blockchain company Aleo, Fortune reported on Tuesday, citing Aleo co-founder Howard Wu.

Unlike most existing stablecoins, which have wallet addresses and transaction details fully visible onchain, USDCx is designed to provide “banking-level privacy.” Circle would still be able to provide a compliance record if law enforcement or regulators request information on specific transactions, according to the report.

The initiative aims to address a key hurdle for major financial institutions, many of which have been hesitant to utilize blockchain-based payment rails because their transaction flows would be publicly visible.

Source: Circle

Aleo has long argued that privacy is essential for the next phase of stablecoin adoption. In a May post, the company wrote that while transparency is often promoted as a core blockchain advantage, “it becomes a liability when dealing with sensitive, confidential payment data.”

Aleo isn’t the only company pushing for privacy in stablecoins. As Cointelegraph reported, digital asset infrastructure provider Taurus has developed a private smart-contract system for stablecoins, designed to enable anonymous transactions. This approach aims to boost the use of stable assets for intracompany payments and employee payrolls.

Related: Bank lobby is ‘panicking’ about yield-bearing stablecoins

Stablecoins take center stage in corporate America

Circle’s move into privacy-focused stable assets comes as more major institutions begin exploring stablecoins in the wake of the US GENIUS Act, the new regulatory framework governing US dollar–pegged tokens.

As Cointelegraph reported, a corporate stablecoin race is emerging in the wake of GENIUS. Citigroup has partnered with Coinbase to test stablecoin-based payment rails for its clients, while other Wall Street companies, including JPMorgan and Bank of America, are reportedly in the early stages of experimenting with similar technologies.

Global remittance provider Western Union is also building a digital asset settlement system on Solana, with plans to introduce a US Dollar Payment Token as part of its infrastructure overhaul. Meanwhile, global payments giant Visa has expanded its stablecoin offerings amid growing competition in the space.

Average stablecoin supply by issuer. Source: Visa Onchain Analytics

The US dollar underpins the vast majority of global stablecoin activity. USDC (USDC) and Tether’s USDt (USDT) together account for roughly 85% of the market, while other dollar-linked tokens, including synthetic dollars and PayPal USD (PYUSD), also rank among the largest.

Related: Crypto Biz: Wall Street giants bet on stablecoins

Letture associate

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

AI investor Leopold Aschenbrenner has made a significant portfolio shift, taking a $9 billion nominal short position against top AI infrastructure stocks like NVIDIA, ASML, and Oracle. Simultaneously, he is redirecting capital towards what he sees as the next critical bottlenecks in the AI boom: power, memory, and data center networking, alongside private investments in AI model companies like Anthropic. This move is interpreted not as a call that the AI bubble has burst, but as a rotation within the infrastructure stack. The analysis highlights NVIDIA's recent $25 billion bond issuance as a potential signal, questioning why a cash-rich company would seek external debt despite high profits and increased dividends/buybacks. The core investment thesis is that the initial, crowded "picks and shovels" trade in semiconductors is maturing. The next wave of capital is expected to flow into the physical and logistical constraints of AI expansion: electricity supply, memory chip capacity, data center construction, and enabling technologies like optical networking (fiber) for high-bandwidth communication, where copper remains crucial for short distances. Aschenbrenner's substantial (approx. 20% of fund) private stake in Anthropic is noted as a key part of his strategy—investing directly in the "mine" (AI models) rather than just the "shovels." The discussion concludes that while certain segments may be overvalued, the overarching AI infrastructure demand driven by real product usage remains robust. The most promising long-term investments are seen in essential, non-sexy infrastructure—particularly energy and power companies—whose demand is viewed as a global constant irrespective of AI's cyclicality.

marsbit23 min fa

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

marsbit23 min fa

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit51 min fa

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit51 min fa

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit1 h fa

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片