‘Circle had 6 hours to freeze funds’ – ZachXBT slams CEO after DRIFT hack

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-04-02Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-04-02

Introduzione

In the past 24 hours, Drift Protocol on Solana suffered a $285 million hack, including the theft of Circle’s USDC. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT accused Circle of failing to freeze $230 million in stolen USDC that was bridged from Solana to Ethereum via CCTP, despite having a 6-hour window to act. He criticized Circle and its CEO Jeremy Allaire for incompetence, alleging they use compliance buzzwords without real implementation. The hack impacted 11 protocols, with Ranger Finance losing $900K. Although Solana’s Chief Product Officer called it an isolated incident, the event raised broader DeFi security concerns. Circle’s stock extended its decline, with indicators showing oversold conditions and continued selling pressure.

In the past 24 hours, another security threat has occurred in crypto. Drift Protocol [DRIFT], built on the Solana [SOL] blockchain, lost about $285 million in a hack that stole several coins, including stablecoins like Circle’s USDC.

Circle is currently undergoing its second fix, just a few days after facing accusations of failing to protect customers. A week ago, they froze 16 wallets that showed clear business transactions after a request that had errors.

However, they have since started to unfreeze some of these 16 wallets.

With the incident proving some level of incompetence, another accusation by ZachXBT has arisen, linking it with the Drift Protocol hack.

ZachXBT accuses Circle of failure to protect customers

As per ZachXBT, Circle Protocol [CRCL] failed to freeze $230 million USDC from the exploit. The amount was bridged from Solana to Ethereum [ETH] via CCTP. ZachXBT said,

6 hours is how long Circle had to freeze stolen funds from the $280M+ Drift hack.

The blockchain investigator accused them of sleeping while more than 100 transactions were happening, even though it was three hours after the hack incident. He labeled Circle and the CEO, Jeremy Allaire, as bad actors for the industry.

Source: ZachXBT/X

Users were wondering how such a well-known DeFi app did not have a special monitoring place. In response, ZachXBT said Circle uses buzzwords like “compliance” and “regulated” without actual implementation. He noted,

Who believes them unbeknownst of the problem

Impact on the broader crypto market

Meanwhile, several protocols had confirmed impacts following the Drift exploit, as per a post by SolanaFloor. About 11 protocols suspended most of their activity, with Ranger Finance losing $900K.

However, the Chief Product Officer at the Solana Foundation assured users of security and a bounce back for the whole chain. He clarified,

“This is an isolated incident and says nothing about Solana DeFi or any other Solana product...But I know the Solana DeFi community will pick up the pieces and rebuild fast as only Solana can.

For the broader crypto market, this incident raises concerns about the security of DeFi protocols and their position, even as regulations seek to curb malicious activities done through these protocols.

Circle stock extends its price decline

On the charts, Circle stock extended its decline that started after the first acquisition seven days ago. However, it is trading above the previous higher high at $90, but such news could lead to a breakdown.

Source: CRCL/USD on TradingView

Furthermore, CRCL was seeing capital leave as the Money Flow Index (MFI) dropped to 19. This indicated the stock was oversold, with Bull Bear Power (BBP) showing seller dominance.


Final Summary

  • ZachXBT accuses Circle of not freezing the $230 million USDC bridge from Solana to Ethereum.
  • Circle’s stock declined even though the Chief Product Officer at Solana assured users of a bounce back.

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QWhat was the total amount lost in the Drift Protocol hack and which stablecoin was involved?

AThe Drift Protocol hack resulted in a loss of about $285 million, which included stablecoins like Circle's USDC.

QAccording to ZachXBT, how much time did Circle have to freeze the stolen USDC funds and what was the amount?

AZachXBT stated that Circle had 6 hours to freeze $230 million in USDC that was stolen and bridged from Solana to Ethereum.

QWhat accusation did ZachXBT make against Circle and its CEO regarding the hack?

AZachXBT accused Circle and its CEO, Jeremy Allaire, of being 'bad actors for the industry' for failing to freeze the stolen funds despite having ample time and multiple transactions occurring.

QHow did the Solana Foundation's Chief Product Officer characterize the Drift Protocol incident?

AThe Chief Product Officer at the Solana Foundation characterized the incident as an 'isolated incident' that does not reflect on Solana DeFi or other Solana products, and expressed confidence that the community would rebuild quickly.

QWhat was the impact on Circle's stock (CRCL) following the news of the hack and the accusations?

ACircle's stock extended its price decline, with the Money Flow Index dropping to 19, indicating the stock was oversold, and Bull Bear Power showing seller dominance.

Letture associate

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手54 min fa

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手54 min fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手1 h fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare DRIFT

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di Drift Protocol (DRIFT) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente Drift ProtocolDRIFT.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva Drift Protocol (DRIFT)Dopo aver acquistato Drift Protocol (DRIFT), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia Drift Protocol (DRIFT)Scambia facilmente Drift Protocol (DRIFT) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

356 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.11Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare DRIFT

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di DRIFT DRIFT sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片