Chainlink attracts capital as rivals bleed – LINK’s move above $9.17 IF…

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-09Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-09

Introduzione

Amid a weak crypto market with widespread outflows from major assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana, Chainlink (LINK) demonstrated notable resilience. It attracted consistent capital inflows, recording $1.93 million on March 5 and $935,310 on March 6, while ranking third in development activity. LINK formed an ascending triangle pattern, with key resistance at $9.17 and support at $8.30. Momentum indicators like RSI and MACD showed slight improvement, though a clear bullish signal was not yet confirmed. For the positive momentum to translate into price action, holding above $8.30 is critical, while a break above $9.17 would validate its strength.

Crypto markets look weak again, and fear still moves faster than conviction.

Between the 5th and 6th of March, money flowed out of major crypto assets fast. Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana all took hits as traders turned cautious. LINK, however, refused to go down with the rest.

That divergence mattered. While broad capital exited the market, Chainlink kept attracting money. Therefore, the asset started to stand out for the right reasons, not because of hype, but because it refused to crack.

So, what exactly kept Chainlink in that conversation?

Chainlink ranks among top crypto projects

Chainlink stayed near the top where serious projects usually lived, not where noise survived.

According to Santiment, Chainlink ranked third in crypto development activity over the last 30 days. MetaMask USD took the top spot, while Hedera ranked second. Therefore, LINK remained among the few names still showing real building strength.

That ranking said something ugly about the rest of the market. Many tokens demanded attention, but fewer actually earned it through visible work. Meanwhile, Chainlink kept showing up where it mattered, inside the data.

LINK recorded inflows while major crypto assets saw outflows

This was where the story stopped being talked and started becoming pressure.

On the 5th of March, LINK recorded inflows of 1.93 million. On the 6th of March, it recorded another 935.31 thousand in inflows.

However, those same sessions hit the broader market with aggressive outflows across major assets.

That made the contrast impossible to ignore. Bitcoin [BTC], Ethereum [ETH], Ripple[XRP], and Solana[SOL] all struggled to hold investor demand. Meanwhile, LINK absorbed capital on two straight days, even as the rest of the market tasted pain.

What proves Chainlink is ready to follow through in price action?

The chart showed structure, and structure usually mattered more than noise.

Chainlin [LINK] formed an ascending triangle, which kept pressure building beneath flat resistance. The 9.17 level acted as the ceiling, while 8.30 marked the next likely tap on ascending support. Therefore, buyers still had a level worth defending.

Momentum indicators also showed slight improvement, even if the signal remained weak. The RSI hinted that bearish pressure had started to ease, while the MACD began turning slightly positive too. However, bulls still lacked full control, so the setup had not confirmed a clean breakout yet.

That was where the tension sat. LINK had the fuel from inflows and development activity, but the price still needed to respond properly.

Failure to hold 8.30 would weaken the case sharply, while a stronger move above resistance would start validating the broader strength.


Final Summary

  • Chainlink showed unusual strength as development activity stayed high and capital kept flowing in.
  • LINK still needed to defend 8.30 before on-chain strength could fully translate into price action.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat made Chainlink (LINK) stand out in the crypto market between March 5th and 6th?

AWhile major crypto assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana experienced significant outflows and price declines, Chainlink attracted capital with inflows of $1.93 million on March 5th and $935.31 thousand on March 6th, refusing to decline with the broader market.

QHow did Chainlink rank in terms of development activity according to Santiment?

AAccording to Santiment, Chainlink ranked third in crypto development activity over the last 30 days, behind MetaMask USD in first place and Hedera in second, indicating strong ongoing project development.

QWhat key price level must LINK defend to maintain its bullish structure?

ALINK must defend the $8.30 level, which acts as the ascending support in its chart pattern. A failure to hold this level would significantly weaken the bullish case.

QWhat pattern did LINK form on its price chart, and what was the resistance level?

ALINK formed an ascending triangle pattern on its chart, with $9.17 acting as the flat resistance ceiling that price was testing.

QWhat did the momentum indicators (RSI and MACD) suggest about LINK's price action?

AThe RSI hinted that bearish pressure had started to ease, and the MACD began turning slightly positive, indicating some improvement in momentum, though bulls still lacked full control and a clean breakout hadn't been confirmed yet.

Letture associate

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit7 min fa

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit7 min fa

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit7 min fa

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit7 min fa

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit23 min fa

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit23 min fa

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the current artificial intelligence investment boom shows classic signs of a bubble, which he expects will eventually burst. In a Bloomberg Television interview, he noted that great technological revolutions often lead to capital inflows that create bubbles, making it difficult for investors and companies to calibrate their spending accurately—either overspending to capture market share or underspending and losing their competitive position. This caution comes amid significant rallies in AI-related assets, particularly chipmakers, driven by soaring demand for data centers and high-bandwidth chips, raising debates about overheating valuations. In contrast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently asserted that investors embracing the AI wave would see "crazy" returns and dismissed concerns over return on investment for data center spending as outdated. Dalio, however, focuses on the risks in the profit realization phase. He argues that bubbles tend to show signs of破裂 when markets transition from investment to the need for tangible returns, describing the burst as a process of converting paper wealth into cash. While acknowledging AI's intrinsic value, he expressed concern over the future profitability of some AI companies, suggesting the market is repeating a familiar pattern. The 76-year-old billionaire, who fully exited Bridgewater in 2025, has a net worth estimated at $21.5 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

marsbit57 min fa

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

marsbit57 min fa

Privacy Coin Crisis of Confidence! ZEC Plunges Over 56% in a Single Day

Zcash (ZEC), a leading privacy-focused cryptocurrency, experienced a severe crash on June 5th, plummeting over 56% in a single day and erasing nearly two months of gains. The flash crash was triggered by the disclosure of a critical zero-knowledge proof vulnerability within Zcash's Orchard privacy pool, which had existed since the pool's launch in May 2022. The flaw theoretically allowed an attacker to forge unlimited ZEC undetectably due to the pool's privacy features. The vulnerability was discovered on May 29th by independent security researcher Taylor Hornby during a proactive audit commissioned by Shielded Labs, utilizing AI-assisted analysis. The Zcash development team responded swiftly, implementing an emergency soft fork to disable Orchard transactions on June 2nd and executing a permanent hard fork fix (NU6.2) on June 3rd. Despite the technical fix, a major crisis of confidence emerged. The core issue is that Orchard's privacy design makes it cryptographically impossible to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited over the past four years, casting permanent doubt on the historical supply integrity of ZEC. While Shielded Labs argues exploitation was unlikely, the inability to provide definitive proof has severely damaged market trust. This sentiment was exacerbated when BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, a prominent ZEC supporter, announced he was selling his entire position. He stated that privacy assets require "perfect security" rather than "probable safety." The combined effect of the disclosure and Hayes's exit ignited widespread panic selling, leading to massive liquidations and significant price decline. Analysts note the event highlights a fundamental tension within privacy coins: the conflict between verifiable supply and cryptographic privacy.

链捕手1 h fa

Privacy Coin Crisis of Confidence! ZEC Plunges Over 56% in a Single Day

链捕手1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare LINK

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di ChainLink (LINK) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente ChainLinkLINK.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva ChainLink (LINK)Dopo aver acquistato ChainLink (LINK), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia ChainLink (LINK)Scambia facilmente ChainLink (LINK) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

835 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.13Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare LINK

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di LINK LINK sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片