CertiK Tightens KYC and Strengthens Oversight After Huione Backlash, CEO Denies IPO Plans

TheNewsCryptoPubblicato 2026-02-12Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-12

Introduzione

CertiK has enhanced its KYC procedures and oversight after facing criticism for auditing a stablecoin project linked to the illicit Huione marketplace last year. CEO Ronghui Gu acknowledged the incident as a turning point, leading to stricter client checks, collaboration with external risk experts, and ongoing monitoring of audit report usage. The firm now prioritizes institution-level standards to meet demands from large financial entities for rigorous code safety proofs and regulator-friendly reports. Gu denied current IPO plans despite investor interest, citing market challenges in valuing Web3 companies. He also highlighted evolving risks, including private key mismanagement, deepfakes, and price manipulation, emphasizing trust-building as critical for institutional partnerships.

Blockchain security firm CertiK says that it has improved its procedures and tightened its checks after facing criticism last year for auditing a project linked to the illicit Huione marketplace. Ronghui Gu, CEO of CertiK, said that this episode became a turning point for the firm.

What really happened

CertiK audited a stablecoin project last year. However, the project has links to Huione, which is a marketplace for illegal activities. Online critics questioned whether the audit happened and whether CertiK should have done more background checks. Ronghui Gu replied to all the critics that the company has audited the software, which was given by a U.S.-registered client, and later audited fee has been donated to the charity, and treated this backlash as a lesson.

After this incident, Gu said that CertiK strengthened its KYC and screening process by checking clients more carefully, working with outside risk experts, and increasing monitoring of how its audit reports are used. He said that the firm now keeps a “very close eye” even after the auditing is done.

While auditing the crypto projects was the core for CertiK to earn, Gu says that these services must now meet the institution-level standards. Large financial firms want deeper testing and stronger proof that code is safe, and a clear report they can show regulators. So meeting those needs is now the top priority for the firm, he said.

Gu’s reply on public listing

In January, Gu spoke at the World Economic Forum, which has increased speculation about the possible public listing. He says that media reports went too far, and right now there is no plan, but yes, the investors are really interested. Adding on, he said the market still doesn’t know how to value Web3 companies properly.

Gu also warned that risks are changing. Previously Hackers attacked the smart contracts, but right now, many problem arises from private key handling, deepfakes, and price feed manipulation. He says the firm is still researching the solution for the Deepfakes, which is especially very hard.

For CertiK, building trust is more important because large institutions will only work with companies that they believe in. Gu believes that the Huione moment makes the company stronger for the future and forced to upgrade, improve, and prepare for the stricter expectations from global finance.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Human API Launches Platform Enabling Direct AI-to-Human Task Coordination

TagsCertiKIPO

Domande pertinenti

QWhat changes did CertiK implement after the Huione-related backlash?

ACertiK strengthened its KYC and screening processes by conducting more thorough client checks, collaborating with external risk experts, and enhancing monitoring of how its audit reports are used. The company now maintains ongoing vigilance even after audits are completed.

QHow did CertiK's CEO characterize the Huione incident?

ARonghui Gu described the Huione incident as a turning point for the company that forced them to upgrade and improve their procedures to meet stricter expectations from global financial institutions.

QWhat did Ronghui Gu say about CertiK's potential IPO?

AGu denied current IPO plans, stating that media reports had gone too far with speculation. He acknowledged investor interest but noted that the market still doesn't know how to properly value Web3 companies.

QWhat new types of security risks did Gu highlight as emerging threats?

AGu warned that risks are evolving from smart contract attacks to problems involving private key handling, deepfakes, and price feed manipulation, with deepfakes being particularly challenging to address.

QHow did CertiK handle the audit fee from the controversial Huione-linked project?

ACertiK donated the audit fee from the Huione-linked project to charity after the software audit was completed for their U.S.-registered client.

Letture associate

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手26 min fa

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手26 min fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手49 min fa

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手49 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片