CertiK Annual Security Report: Web3 Losses Increase 37% Year-on-Year in 2025, Phishing Attacks and Supply Chain Incidents Emerge as Major Threats

marsbitPubblicato 2025-12-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-12-25

Introduzione

CertiK's 2025 Skynet Hack3D Security Report reveals that the Web3 industry suffered approximately $3.35 billion in losses across 630 security incidents, a 37% increase from 2024. While the number of incidents decreased by 137, the average loss per attack surged by 66.6% to $5.32 million, indicating a trend toward targeting high-value assets. The most significant losses resulted from supply chain attacks, which accounted for nearly half of the total losses ($1.45 billion) despite only two recorded incidents. The largest was the February Bybit breach, where attackers compromised a third-party multi-signature wallet service to bypass security protocols. Phishing remained the most frequent threat, with 248 incidents causing $723 million in losses. The report warns that AI is amplifying these attacks by generating highly convincing fake websites and targeted scam messages, making traditional defenses less effective. Amid growing risks, regulatory clarity is improving globally, with advancements in U.S. stablecoin legislation and frameworks like MiCA in the EU. Security is shifting from a reactive cost to a core infrastructure element. The report concludes that projects embedding security into their design and development will be better positioned for the future.

On December 23, CertiK, the world's largest Web3 security company, released the "2025 Skynet Hack3D Web3 Security Report," systematically outlining the major security incidents and risk trends in the Web3 space over the past year. The report indicates that while the Web3 industry is accelerating its development amid a recovering market environment and clearer regulatory expectations, security risks have not eased and continue to pose systemic security threats.

The report shows that in 2025, the Web3 space experienced 630 security incidents, resulting in total losses of approximately $3.35 billion, a 37% year-on-year increase compared to 2024. Although the number of incidents decreased by 137 compared to the previous year, the average loss per attack reached $5.322 million, a sharp increase of 66.6%, highlighting the trend of attackers targeting high-value objectives.

Supply Chain Attacks Drive Annual Losses Higher

In terms of attack types, supply chain attacks became the largest source of losses in 2025. Despite only two recorded incidents throughout the year, the cumulative losses amounted to $1.45 billion, accounting for nearly half of the total annual losses. The majority of these losses stemmed from the Bybit incident in February.

According to the report, the security incident experienced by Bybit in February 2025 resulted in approximately $1.4 billion in losses, making it one of the largest cryptocurrency thefts to date. The attackers did not directly breach the exchange's system but instead infiltrated the developer environment of a third-party multi-signature wallet service provider, embedding malicious code in the signing process to bypass multiple approval mechanisms.

CertiK noted in the report that such incidents reflect attackers increasingly focusing their resources on critical service providers and underlying tools rather than individual protocols, underscoring that supply chain security has become an unavoidable systemic risk.

High Frequency of Phishing Attacks, AI Acts as an "Amplifier"

In terms of attack frequency, phishing remained the most common security threat in 2025. The report shows that a total of 248 phishing attack incidents were recorded throughout the year, resulting in approximately $723 million in losses, slightly higher than the number of code vulnerability attacks (240 incidents).

Notably, CertiK believes this figure may still be an underestimate. A significant number of phishing and scam incidents targeting individual users were not formally disclosed, especially those involving smaller losses or off-chain social engineering attacks.

The report emphasizes that the proliferation of artificial intelligence is significantly lowering the technical barriers to phishing attacks. Attackers are increasingly using AI to generate highly realistic phishing websites, wallet pop-ups, and multilingual scam messages, combined with on-chain data and social media content for "precision targeting." Traditional defense methods relying on grammatical errors or template features for identification are gradually becoming ineffective.

Regulatory Clarity Increases, Security Shifts from "Cost Item" to "Infrastructure"

Amid rising risks, the report also notes positive changes in the global regulatory environment. Legislative progress in the U.S. around stablecoins and digital asset transparency has sent clearer policy signals to the industry. Regulatory frameworks such as the EU's MiCA, Singapore's regulatory sandbox, and Hong Kong's initiatives are also pushing Web3 toward a more standardized development phase.

CertiK pointed out in the report that as institutional and compliant funds continue to enter the space, security capabilities are transitioning from "post-incident remediation" to an infrastructure element in project design and operations. For both project teams and individual users, security is no longer optional but a critical factor affecting long-term viability.

The report concludes by projecting that in the coming year, AI-driven impersonation attacks, increasingly complex supply chain intrusions, and social engineering attacks targeting individual users will continue to evolve. In this context, projects that embed security into architectural design, development processes, and user experience are more likely to stand out in the next wave of Web3 competition.

Full report: https://indd.adobe.com/view/6935ac85-c644-4048-9e27-1d310549aa0a

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to CertiK's 2025 report, what was the total financial loss in the Web3 sector and what was the year-over-year percentage increase?

AThe total financial loss in the Web3 sector was approximately $3.35 billion, representing a 37% year-over-year increase compared to 2024.

QWhich type of attack was identified as the largest source of loss in 2025, and what was a key characteristic of the Bybit incident?

ASupply chain attacks were the largest source of loss. A key characteristic of the Bybit incident was that attackers did not directly breach the exchange's system but instead compromised a third-party multi-signature wallet service provider's developer environment to inject malicious code.

QWhat was the most frequent type of attack in 2025, and how is AI impacting this threat?

APhishing attacks were the most frequent, with 248 recorded incidents. AI is acting as an 'amplifier' by lowering the technical barrier, enabling attackers to create highly realistic phishing sites, wallet pop-ups, and multi-language scam messages for 'precision targeting'.

QHow did the average loss per attack change in 2025, and what does this trend indicate?

AThe average loss per attack reached $5.322 million, a sharp increase of 66.6% year-over-year. This trend highlights that attackers are concentrating their efforts on higher-value targets.

QHow is the role of security changing for Web3 projects according to the report's view on the evolving regulatory landscape?

AWith clearer regulations and more institutional capital entering the space, security is shifting from being a 'cost item' and 'remedial measure' to a fundamental 'infrastructure' element that is integrated into project design and operations, crucial for long-term viability.

Letture associate

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit3 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit3 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手3 h fa

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手3 h fa

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit6 h fa

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit6 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片