Centrifuge and Pharos Collaborate to Advance On-Chain Distribution Infrastructure for Institutional Assets

marsbitPubblicato 2026-02-17Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-02-17

Introduzione

Centrifuge and Pharos have announced a collaboration to build shared on-chain infrastructure for the scalable distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets, including tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA). The partnership addresses a core challenge in institutional onchain finance: distribution. While tokenization has advanced significantly, many institutional assets remain siloed, inaccessible, or become inactive after issuance. A key issue is that access to dollar-denominated products like credit and Treasuries remains restricted in many markets outside the U.S. and Western Europe due to regulatory, operational, and custodial barriers. Even when tokenized, these assets are often distributed in a fragmented way, limiting their reach and usability within active on-chain financial systems. By integrating Centrifuge’s institutional tokenization infrastructure with Pharos’s “inclusive, execution-first” Layer 1 blockchain, the partnership aims to create a unified environment for asset distribution, liquidity, and continuous on-chain operation. Pharos will serve as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets originated through Centrifuge, enabling deeper liquidity pathways and broader capital access. Centrifuge Labs CEO Bhaji Illuminati emphasized that “tokenization alone doesn’t solve accessibility and usability,” underscoring the need for distribution infrastructure. Pharos CEO Wish Wu noted that “the challeng...

February 17, 2026 - Centrifuge and Pharos announced today a collaboration aimed at enabling institutional-grade assets, including tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA), to achieve scaled distribution and operation on-chain through a shared infrastructure framework.

This collaboration focuses on addressing a key challenge in institutional onchain finance: distribution. Although significant progress has been made in asset tokenization, a large number of institutional assets remain difficult to access, fragmented across different platforms, or become "static assets" after issuance, lacking continuous use cases. This collaboration aims to ensure that institutional assets do not merely stop at on-chain issuance but remain continuously usable within a functioning, real on-chain financial system.

In many markets outside the U.S. and Western Europe, access to dollar-denominated credit and treasury products still faces regulatory, account registration, custody, and operational hurdles. Even when these products are tokenized, their distribution often remains indirect and fragmented, limiting their ability to reach new participants and their potential for active deployment and use after being brought on-chain.

By combining Centrifuge's institutional-grade tokenization infrastructure and asset standards with Pharos's "inclusive, execution-first" Layer 1, this collaboration addresses these challenges at a systemic level. Pharos will serve as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued through Centrifuge, providing high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity to facilitate broader capital inflow and create deeper on-chain liquidity pathways. This integrated environment covers wallet access, platform and enterprise channels, and execution capabilities, enabling assets to be accessed, aggregated, allocated, and reused, rather than remaining idle long after issuance.

Bhaji Illuminati, CEO of Centrifuge Labs, stated: "Tokenization alone does not solve the problems of accessibility and usability. The focus of this collaboration is to build the distribution and infrastructure layers that allow institutional assets to function within a real on-chain financial environment."

Pharos is positioned as an inclusive financial Layer 1, supporting high-throughput real-world financial workflows through native deep parallel execution and a modular architecture. The network is designed to host large-scale institutional asset activities and enable continuous on-chain operations.

Wish Wu, CEO of Pharos, stated: "The challenge is not demand, but infrastructure. This collaboration focuses on creating an environment where institutional assets can migrate on-chain and remain active within an open, composable financial system."

This collaboration is an early step towards "operational onchain finance": institutional assets are not only mapped onto the chain but are also supported by infrastructure designed for distribution, execution, and long-term engagement.

Pharos Network

Pharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, where real value and institutional-grade assets can circulate on-chain and achieve composability with decentralized assets, thereby becoming the next generation of financial-grade infrastructure for the global economy. Pharos combines a modular architecture, deep parallel execution, and built-in compliance capabilities to drive the development of an "asset-native" ecosystem. The project is built by a management and engineering team from Ant Group and is backed by Hack VC, Faction VC, and other global traditional finance (TradFi) investors.

Official website: https://www.pharos.xyz/

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main goal of the collaboration between Centrifuge and Pharos?

AThe main goal is to enable scalable distribution and operation of institutional-grade assets, such as tokenized U.S. Treasuries (JTRSY) and AAA-rated structured credit products (JAAA), on-chain through a shared infrastructure framework.

QWhat key challenge in institutional onchain finance does this partnership aim to address?

AThe partnership aims to address the challenge of distribution, ensuring that institutional assets are not just tokenized but remain actively usable within a functioning onchain financial system.

QHow does Pharos contribute to this collaboration?

APharos serves as a strategic liquidity and distribution layer for assets issued through Centrifuge, providing high-performance infrastructure and ecosystem connectivity to facilitate broader capital access and deeper onchain liquidity pathways.

QWhat is Pharos Network's primary focus as a Layer 1 blockchain?

APharos is an inclusive financial Layer 1 for RealFi, designed to enable the circulation of real-world and institutional-grade assets on-chain with composability with decentralized assets, featuring modular architecture, deep parallel execution, and built-in compliance capabilities.

QAccording to the CEOs, what is the broader vision behind this partnership?

AThe broader vision is to move towards 'operational onchain finance,' where institutional assets are not only tokenized but are actively supported by infrastructure designed for distribution, execution, and long-term engagement in an open, composable financial system.

Letture associate

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit34 min fa

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit34 min fa

CLARITY Act Hits New Roadblock As Ethics Agreement Collapses In Senate Talks

The CLARITY Act has encountered a new obstacle as a bipartisan Senate group's agreement on ethics provisions collapsed. Republicans reportedly reversed their position on a key element that would have allowed state attorneys general to sue the Department of Justice for failing to enforce ethics rules related to President Trump. Democrats viewed this as an "about face" from a prior tentative deal. As a counter-proposal, Republicans suggested limiting enforcement authority to the Attorney General and mentioned impeachment as a potential remedy for violations. The impasse leaves the crypto market structure bill's path to a full Senate vote uncertain. Another major hurdle involves law enforcement groups' concerns that the bill could hinder investigations into blockchain-related crimes like money laundering. The White House Crypto Council is scheduled to meet with these groups to address these issues, particularly around the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. Key Democratic senators have stated their support for the CLARITY Act is contingent on adequately addressing both ethics and law enforcement concerns.

bitcoinist1 h fa

CLARITY Act Hits New Roadblock As Ethics Agreement Collapses In Senate Talks

bitcoinist1 h fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2 h fa

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2 h fa

Japan’s Largest Banks Eye FY2026 Stablecoin Rollout Amid Regulatory Push

Japan's three largest banks—MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp., and Mizuho Bank—are advancing plans to launch a jointly-issued yen-pegged stablecoin by the end of fiscal year 2026 (March 31, 2027). They have established a voluntary council to develop the operational framework, governance, and issuance infrastructure for the token, which will be issued under a trust agreement. The move aligns with Japan's regulatory push to expand its yen-based digital asset market, following 2022 amendments to the Payment Services Act that restrict stablecoin issuance to licensed entities like banks and trust companies. The banks, which began exploring this initiative in late 2025, aim to support a wide range of use cases and are considering future collaborations with other financial institutions. This development occurs alongside other yen-stablecoin launches and recent political proposals to promote such tokens for settlement in Asia.

bitcoinist2 h fa

Japan’s Largest Banks Eye FY2026 Stablecoin Rollout Amid Regulatory Push

bitcoinist2 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News2 h fa

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News2 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures