CARF Global Implementation Timeline Overview: What Are the Commitments of Mainland China and Hong Kong?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-01-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-01-28

Introduzione

CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is a global framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related data on crypto-assets, targeting crypto-asset service providers as reporting entities. As of the end of 2025, 76 jurisdictions have committed to implementing CARF, with a phased rollout plan. The first group, including the UK and EU member states, will begin automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028. Data collection for reportable transactions will begin one year prior, starting in 2026. Hong Kong has explicitly committed to implementing CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data in 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with partner jurisdictions in 2028. Service providers operating in Hong Kong must establish compliance and reporting mechanisms. In contrast, Mainland China has not yet committed to CARF and is not included in any of the implementation batches. It is also not listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction with relevance that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict limitations on crypto-asset activities, there are no legal crypto-asset service providers that could be integrated into the CARF system. Therefore, in the short term, Mainland China does not meet the conditions for participating in CARF's routine information exchange. It is noted that Mainland C...

Author: Fintax

Basic Positioning of CARF

CARF is a framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets, with crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, used to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

Global Implementation Progress and Timeline

According to information released by the OECD Global Forum, as of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing CARF and will advance its implementation in batches.

The first group of jurisdictions plans to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027, primarily including the UK and EU member states, etc.; the second group of jurisdictions plans to fully implement in 2028, including Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and China Hong Kong, etc.

According to the institutional arrangement, the collection of relevant transaction data will commence one year in advance, starting from 2026, crypto-asset service providers will need to systematically organize reportable transaction information.

Figure 1: Overview of CARF Implementation Progress in Major Jurisdictions

China Hong Kong: Clear Participation and Timetable Advancement

In the aforementioned arrangement, China Hong Kong has clearly committed to implementing CARF and will advance related work according to the international timetable.

Hong Kong plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and commence automatic tax information exchange with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028.

Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms, and relevant reportable transactions will be included in the cross-border information exchange process.

Mainland China: Not Yet Committed and Outside the Implementation Scope

In comparison, Mainland China has not yet made an implementation commitment to CARF.

As of the current stage, Mainland China is not included in any implementation batch of CARF, nor has it been listed by the OECD as a jurisdiction that is relevant but has not yet committed to participation.

Under the current regulatory framework, the mainland adopts a strict restrictive attitude towards cryptocurrency trading activities, and there are no legal crypto-asset service providers within the country that can be纳入 the CARF reporting system; therefore, it does not currently meet the institutional conditions for participating in CARF's regularized information exchange.

Future Possibilities and Realistic Judgment

It should be pointed out that Mainland China has fully implemented CRS since 2018 and has mature experience in financial account information exchange.

If future crypto-asset regulatory policies are adjusted, the mainland has the institutional and technical conditions to对接 CARF.

However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of Mainland China joining this framework around the 2027 launch of CARF and in the following years remains relatively low.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the CARF and what is its primary purpose?

AThe CARF (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) is an international framework for the automatic exchange of tax-related information on crypto-assets. It targets crypto-asset service providers as the reporting entities, aiming to support tax authorities in various jurisdictions in obtaining information related to transactions involving their taxpayers.

QHow many jurisdictions have committed to implementing the CARF as of the end of 2025, and what is the implementation timeline?

AAs of the end of 2025, 76 countries and regions have committed to implementing the CARF. The first group of jurisdictions, including the UK and EU member states, plan to commence the first automatic information exchange in 2027. The second group, which includes Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Hong Kong, China, is scheduled to fully implement the framework in 2028.

QWhat is the commitment and implementation plan of Hong Kong, China regarding the CARF?

AHong Kong, China has explicitly committed to implementing the CARF. It plans to start collecting crypto-asset transaction data from 2027 and begin automatic exchange of tax information with other cooperating jurisdictions in 2028. Crypto-asset service providers operating under Hong Kong's regulatory framework will need to establish corresponding data compliance and reporting mechanisms.

QWhat is the current status of Mainland China's commitment to the CARF?

AMainland China has not yet made a commitment to implement the CARF. It is not included in any of the implementation batches listed by the OECD and is not currently classified as a relevant jurisdiction that has yet to commit. Under its current regulatory framework, which imposes strict restrictions on crypto-asset activities, there are no legitimate crypto-asset service providers that could be incorporated into the CARF reporting system, making short-term participation unlikely.

QDoes Mainland China have the foundational experience to potentially join the CARF in the future?

AYes, Mainland China has comprehensive experience in financial account information exchange, having fully implemented the CRS (Common Reporting Standard) since 2018. This provides it with the technical and institutional foundation to potentially adapt to the CARF requirements if its crypto-asset regulatory policy were to change in the future. However, given the current policy environment, the possibility of joining the CARF around its 2027 launch or in the subsequent few years remains relatively low.

Letture associate

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, The Place Where You Lose Money Is Called the Stock Market

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, the Place to Lose Money is Called the Stock Market. The article depicts a future (2026) where global stock markets, particularly tech stocks, are exhibiting behaviors and risks reminiscent of the cryptocurrency world. The narrative centers on a sharp crash in South Korea's KOSPI index and leading stocks like SK Hynix, highlighting widespread retail losses, leverage-induced liquidations, and extreme volatility. It argues that a significant shift in market dynamics is underway: pricing is increasingly driven by narratives (like the AI boom) over fundamental valuation, amplified by high leverage and the rapid, emotion-fueled consensus formed on social media. Former crypto traders, seeking new opportunities, brought their high-risk strategies—chasing narratives, using leverage—into equity markets, focusing on sectors like AI and semiconductors. Ironically, data suggests some major tech stocks have recently shown greater volatility and faster crashes than Bitcoin, which is becoming relatively more stable and "stock-like" through institutional adoption. The piece details how leveraged ETFs in Korea, particularly those tied to single stocks, created a vicious cycle of forced selling that exacerbated the market plunge. It concludes that while stocks retain underlying fundamentals, the *trading* of them has undergone a "de-rationalization": markets now prioritize themes, social media sentiment, and leveraged bets over traditional analysis. In a paradoxical twist, Bitcoin is striving to become more like a traditional asset, while a segment of the stock market is becoming more like crypto—a cycle of grand stories, crowded trades, easy leverage, and the pervasive, often misplaced, belief that one can exit before everyone else. The final, poignant wish from a Korean retail investor—to go back to life before trading and get their money back—underscores that markets offer no refunds.

marsbit19 min fa

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, The Place Where You Lose Money Is Called the Stock Market

marsbit19 min fa

Feishu Has Become Doubao

This may be the most important day in the ten-year history of Feishu. On July 30, ByteDance announced a major restructuring via internal email. Feishu, an independent operation for a decade, will no longer function separately and will lose its independent sales and marketing teams. Its product team is being integrated into Doubao AI, and its Go-to-Market strategy merges into the Volcano Engine's To B system. This move signals a strategic pivot, not a failure of Feishu. The era where Feishu sought to be an all-encompassing super-app for productivity is ending. AI has become the dominant logic. Industry trends show a shift from building platform "entrances" to embedding AI directly into workflows, as seen with Microsoft Copilot and Google's Gemini. Data reveals the driver: over 90% of Feishu's new clients in Q2 2026 purchased its AI products. Enterprises are now buying integrated AI solutions, not standalone software. By integrating Feishu's deep enterprise workflow scenarios, Doubao evolves from a consumer-facing chatbot into a powerful enterprise productivity engine. This gives Doubao a critical asset: real-world business application. Concurrently, ByteDance established the "Creative Services Platform," unifying its previously fragmented sales fronts (Feishu, Doubao, Volcano Engine) into a single customer-facing entity. This represents ByteDance's first genuine shift to thinking like a true To B company, organizing around client needs rather than internal product silos. The restructuring underscores that AI is no longer just a business line but foundational infrastructure. Doubao is becoming the new organizational core, mirroring TikTok's past ascendancy. This demonstrates a profound shift: AI is beginning to reshape corporate structures, determining resource allocation and strategic priorities. ByteDance is likely just the first of many companies to undergo such an AI-driven reorganization.

marsbit30 min fa

Feishu Has Become Doubao

marsbit30 min fa

The Second Half of the RWA Issuance Race: Amidst the Utilization Dilemma, Trillions Worth of On-Chain Assets Awaken

RWA (Real-World Asset) tokenization has surged to a record $32 billion in on-chain value. However, a structural challenge has emerged: approximately 87% of these tokenized assets are inactive, not participating in DeFi lending or trading activities. This "utilization gap" highlights a key question: what happens after assets are brought on-chain? Data shows a stark contrast among major platforms. While Securitize leads in scale ($4.9B), it has a DeFi utilization rate of only 0.7%. Similarly, Ondo Finance ($3.5B) sees about 2.7% utilization. In contrast, Maple Finance, with a smaller $2.3B in assets, achieves a 62% utilization rate by embedding its assets directly into lending activities from the outset. Three primary factors contribute to low utilization: 1) **Asset Nature**: Tokenized treasuries are often held for yield, not traded. 2) **Regulatory Barriers**: Securities laws and KYC requirements restrict free movement into permissionless DeFi pools. 3) **Infrastructure Gaps**: A lack of deep secondary markets, real-time pricing, and mature clearing mechanisms hinders liquidity. The RWA narrative is now shifting from a "race to issue" to a "battle for application." While native lending protocols like Maple have inherent advantages, distribution channels are becoming critical. The success of products like SyrupUSDG on platforms like Robinhood Crypto demonstrates that access to existing user bases can accelerate adoption far more effectively than protocol-led efforts alone. The $32 billion milestone validates the feasibility of tokenization, but low utilization underscores that bringing assets on-chain is just the first step. The true test for the sector is enabling these assets to circulate, be utilized, and create new economic value within the DeFi ecosystem.

marsbit30 min fa

The Second Half of the RWA Issuance Race: Amidst the Utilization Dilemma, Trillions Worth of On-Chain Assets Awaken

marsbit30 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片