Bubblemaps trace Polymarket accounts linked to Iran strike bets

ambcryptoPubblicato 2026-03-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-03-05

Introduzione

Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps has uncovered a network of connected wallets that profited from highly accurate bets on U.S. and Israeli military strikes involving Iran on the prediction market Polymarket. The investigation identified multiple accounts, including one named “nothingeverhappens911,” which moved profits off-platform and was linked via a shared Binance deposit to another account called “Skoobidoobnj.” This second account reportedly earned around $100,000 from bets placed just before strikes on 13 June and 21 June 2025. Two additional connected accounts made approximately $65,000 and $10,000 from bets on a 28 February U.S. strike and a 13 June Israeli operation, respectively. In total, four accounts generated about $240,000 from these trades. These findings follow earlier reports of six wallets making $1.2 million from the 28 February strike, raising concerns about potential use of non-public information. The activity has intensified scrutiny over whether prediction markets incentivize trading on privileged geopolitical knowledge.

Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps says it has identified a network of connected wallets that profited from betting on military strikes involving Iran on the crypto prediction market Polymarket.

In a thread published on X, Bubblemaps said it traced funds between several Polymarket accounts that placed highly accurate bets on U.S. and Israeli strikes. This raises questions about whether traders may have had advance knowledge of geopolitical events.

The findings follow earlier reports that six wallets collectively earned about $1.2 million by betting that the United States would strike Iran on 28 February, with many of the positions reportedly opened only hours before the attack.

Wallet tracing links Polymarket accounts

According to Bubblemaps, a wallet identified as 0xa4eb, operating under the Polymarket username “nothingeverhappens911,” recently moved profits off the platform.

Tracing those funds led to another Polymarket account called “Skoobidoobnj,” with the connection established through a shared Binance deposit address.

The second account allegedly made about $100,000 betting “yes” shortly before two separate military developments involving Iran in 2025.

Those events included:

  • 13 June 2025: Israel launched an operation targeting Iranian assets.
  • 21 June 2025: The United States reportedly joined the conflict with strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow.

Bubblemaps said the on-chain links suggest the accounts may be part of a broader cluster of traders using connected wallets.

Additional accounts identified

The analytics firm said the Polymarket account “Skoobidoobnj” is also linked on-chain to two additional accounts suspected of placing trades at similarly timed intervals.

According to Bubblemaps:

  • One account allegedly earned about $65,000 betting on a U.S. strike on 28 February.
  • Another reportedly made around $10,000 on predictions related to the 13 June Israeli strike.

In total, the firm said four connected Polymarket accounts generated about $240,000 from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran.

Earlier $1.2M betting activity raised scrutiny

The latest findings build on the earlier discovery that six recently funded wallets made roughly $1.2 million from the 28 February U.S. strike market.

Many of those wallets were reportedly funded within 24 hours of the event. They placed bets specifically on a strike occurring on that date.

The timing of the trades drew scrutiny from analysts and policymakers, with critics suggesting the activity could indicate traders acting on privileged information.

Prediction markets face growing attention

Crypto-based prediction platforms such as Polymarket allow users to trade on the likelihood of real-world events ranging from elections to geopolitical conflicts.

While supporters argue that prediction markets can aggregate information efficiently, critics warn that they may create incentives for trading on sensitive or nonpublic information.

The Bubblemaps findings add to the ongoing debate over whether blockchain analytics could help identify suspicious trading behavior in decentralized prediction markets.


Final Summary

  • Bubblemaps says on-chain tracing linked several Polymarket accounts that profited from betting on U.S. and Israeli strikes involving Iran.
  • The findings follow earlier reports that six wallets earned about $1.2M from bets predicting a 28 February U.S. strike on Iran.

Domande pertinenti

QWhat did blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps identify regarding Polymarket accounts and bets on military strikes involving Iran?

ABubblemaps identified a network of connected wallets that profited from betting on military strikes involving Iran on the crypto prediction market Polymarket, with some accounts placing highly accurate bets shortly before the events.

QHow much did the six wallets collectively earn from betting on the U.S. strike on Iran on 28 February, and what was notable about the timing of their bets?

AThe six wallets collectively earned about $1.2 million from betting on the U.S. strike on Iran on 28 February, with many positions opened only hours before the attack.

QWhich Polymarket username was associated with wallet 0xa4eb, and how was it linked to another account called 'Skoobidoobnj'?

AWallet 0xa4eb operated under the Polymarket username 'nothingeverhappens911' and was linked to another account called 'Skoobidoobnj' through a shared Binance deposit address.

QWhat were the two military events in June 2025 that the account 'Skoobidoobnj' reportedly bet on, and how much profit did it make?

AThe account 'Skoobidoobnj' bet on an Israeli operation targeting Iranian assets on 13 June 2025 and U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities at Fordow on 21 June 2025, making about $100,000 in profit.

QWhat is the total amount that the four connected Polymarket accounts generated from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran?

AThe four connected Polymarket accounts generated about $240,000 from bets predicting U.S. and Israeli military actions involving Iran.

Letture associate

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit5 h fa

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit5 h fa

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit5 h fa

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit5 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片