Brale Claims New Protocol Could Eliminate a Major Bottleneck for Scaling Branded Tokens

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-07-30Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-30

Introduzione

Stablecoin infrastructure firm Brale is launching the ION protocol, a new interoperability solution designed to address a major scaling bottleneck: moving the rapidly growing number of custom-branded stablecoins across different blockchains. The protocol uses a burn-and-mint model, allowing stablecoins to move between chains without requiring pre-funded liquidity pools in each supported network. The $300 billion stablecoin market is dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC), but new entrants like banks, fintechs, and asset managers are increasingly issuing their own tokens for payments and settlements. With over 350 asset-pegged coins tracked, the ecosystem is becoming fragmented. Brale's founder, Ben Milne, states that liquidity between stablecoin programs is the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins, as there isn't enough global capital to fund deep liquidity pools for every token on every blockchain. The ION protocol, similar to Circle's CCTP but open to multiple issuers, aims to solve this by eliminating the locked capital requirement of traditional bridges. Initial partners include Monad, Rain, and Coinflow, with a rollout planned from testnet to wider adoption.

Brale, a stablecoin infrastructure firm, is implementing a compatibility protocol designed to put an end to what it says is a bottleneck in the industry's development: moving the rapidly growing number of branded stablecoins across blockchains.

Called the ION protocol, it allows participating stablecoins to move between blockchains by burning tokens on one network and minting an equivalent amount on another. Unlike most blockchain bridges, this model does not require pre-funding liquidity pools in each supported blockchain.

The $300 billion stablecoin market is dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle ($USDC), but new entrants are emerging. Banks, fintech companies, crypto firms, and asset managers are increasingly issuing their own branded tokens for payments, settlements, and tokenized assets.

Data provider CoinGecko already tracks over 350 coins pegged to a real-world asset like a fiat currency, highlighting the growing need for infrastructure to connect the increasingly fragmented ecosystem. Brale argues that today's interoperability model will not scale as more issuers introduce their own versions.

The Stablecoin Scaling Problem

"The company supports over 100 stablecoin programs across more than 30 blockchains", Brale founder and CEO Ben Milne reported.

Many of its clients process billions of dollars in monthly payments while maintaining relatively small stablecoin balances, as their tokens are designed for transactions, not investments.

Moving assets between blockchains typically relies on liquidity pools or wrapped tokens, which requires locking up capital in each supported network. As the number of stablecoins and blockchains grows, so does the capital requirement.

"Liquidity between stablecoin programs is barrier No. 1 to scaling individual stablecoins," Milne said. "There isn't enough capital in the world to solve this."

Due to insufficient capital to create deep liquidity pools for every stablecoin on every blockchain, the current model becomes unsustainable as issuance accelerates. Instead, ION employs a "burn and mint" approach, similar to issuer Circle's ($USDC) Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), extending the model to any participating stablecoin issuer, not just a single token.

The protocol is launching with partners including Monad, Rain, Coinflow, Turnkey, Etherfuse, Spark, and Canton, first on a testnet and then more broadly.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhat is the main problem in the stablecoin industry that Brale's new protocol aims to solve?

ABrale's new protocol aims to solve the problem of moving the rapidly growing number of custom stablecoins across different blockchains, which is seen as a bottleneck for the industry's growth. The current cross-chain liquidity model is considered unsustainable.

QHow does Brale's ION protocol differ from most blockchain bridges for transferring stablecoins?

AUnlike most blockchain bridges, Brale's ION protocol uses a 'burn-and-mint' model. It burns tokens on one blockchain and mints an equivalent amount on another, eliminating the need for pre-funded liquidity pools in each supported blockchain.

QAccording to Brale's CEO, what is the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins?

AAccording to Ben Milne, Brale's founder and CEO, liquidity between stablecoin programs is the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins. He states there isn't enough capital in the world to solve this problem with the current model.

QWhat does the article cite as evidence of the growing need for infrastructure to connect the stablecoin ecosystem?

AThe article cites data from CoinGecko, which tracks over 350 coins pegged to a real-world asset like a fiat currency, as evidence highlighting the growing need for infrastructure to connect the increasingly fragmented ecosystem.

QWhich protocol's approach is Brale's ION similar to, and how does ION expand on it?

ABrale's ION protocol is similar to Circle's Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), which also uses a burn-and-mint approach. ION expands this model to work with any participating stablecoin issuer, rather than being limited to a single token like USDC.

Letture associate

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ru33 min fa

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ru33 min fa

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ru42 min fa

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ru42 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片